Finance and Accounting System

This tender presents a clear service description, but its quality and fairness are significantly undermined by an unrealistic estimated value and the critical absence of evaluation criteria.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and there are no disputes. However, the estimated value of 1.00 EUR for a comprehensive finance and accounting system is highly unrealistic and raises significant concerns regarding transparency and compliance with procurement principles. The missing reveal date also makes it impossible to ascertain if the bidding period was truly reasonable.

The overall description of the required system and services is clear. However, the tender critically lacks specified evaluation criteria, making it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed. The AI-extracted requirements are clear but lack the detailed specifications typically expected for a complex IT system.

Basic information such as title, organization, reference, deadlines, and duration are provided. Documents are listed, and location is specified. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria and the highly unrealistic estimated value, which renders the financial information effectively meaningless.

The tender's fairness is severely compromised by the complete absence of evaluation criteria, which prevents objective and transparent assessment of bids. The stated estimated value of 1.00 EUR is highly misleading for a system of this scope, potentially deterring serious bidders or misrepresenting the true opportunity. Furthermore, direct URLs for tender documents are not provided, creating an access barrier.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of direct URLs for accessing the full tender documents presents a practical barrier for potential bidders. The estimated value of 1.00 EUR provides no useful financial context for planning.

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, the estimated value of 1.00 EUR is fundamentally inconsistent with the described scope of a modern finance and accounting system. Minor inconsistencies include missing codes for the procedure type and an empty 'Liable Person' field. The missing reveal date also contributes to data inconsistency.

The tender does not include any specific requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.