Legal Compliance100/100
The tender appears to follow an open procedure, but the complete lack of detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical capability, and financial standing, along with the absence of tender documents, raises significant concerns regarding transparency, equal treatment, and adherence to public procurement principles.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing eligibility requirements
Clarity40/100
While the general scope of services and geographical area are clearly described, the complete absence of tender documents and specific requirements for bidder qualifications, submission content, and evaluation criteria severely compromises the clarity for potential suppliers.
•No detailed specifications
•No clear submission instructions
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete. The absence of any attached documents, detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility criteria, specific technical capability requirements beyond a restatement of services, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria means essential information for bidders is entirely missing.
•No tender documents
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Fairness60/100
The lack of detailed and objective requirements, particularly for eligibility, technical capability, financial standing, and evaluation criteria, creates a high risk of an unfair and non-transparent procurement process. Without these, the contracting authority has excessive discretion, potentially leading to arbitrary decisions. There is no explicit evidence of tailoring, but the lack of detail is a significant fairness risk.
•Missing objective evaluation criteria
•Potential for arbitrary decision-making due to lack of detailed requirements
Practicality40/100
It is highly impractical for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant tender submission based solely on the summary provided. Essential information regarding the scope's specifics, performance standards, contractual terms, and submission format is entirely absent.
•Insufficient information for bid preparation
•No contract terms or performance standards provided
Data Consistency100/100
The provided summary information is internally consistent, but its brevity and the absence of supporting documents limit the scope for comprehensive consistency checks.
Sustainability0/100
The tender does not include any explicit green, social, or innovation criteria, indicating a missed opportunity to promote sustainable procurement practices.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social criteria