Legal Compliance75/100
As a market engagement notice, it is not subject to the full legal compliance requirements of a formal tender. The description clearly defines its purpose, mitigating the 'Type: None' issue. Deadlines for EOI submission are reasonable, and CPV codes are correctly assigned. No disputes or suspensions are noted.
Clarity80/100
The description of the market engagement's purpose is very clear and unambiguous. The system requirements are well-documented and understandable, and the submission requirements for Expressions of Interest are clearly stated. The lack of formal evaluation criteria is appropriate for this pre-procurement stage.
Completeness70/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, duration, and location are provided. Detailed system requirements are also present. However, the estimated value is classified, and critically, one of the attached documents (Document 1) is irrelevant and refers to a different organization, indicating a significant error in document management.
•Estimated value is classified.
•Irrelevant/incorrect document attached (Document 1).
Fairness65/100
The classified estimated value reduces transparency for potential suppliers. The requirement for email submission, rather than a dedicated e-procurement platform, limits equal access and modern procurement practices. While requirements appear generic and not tailored, these practical limitations impact overall fairness.
•Estimated value is classified.
•Submission via email instead of an e-procurement platform.
Practicality60/100
The reliance on email for Expression of Interest submission is a significant practical drawback, as it is less efficient and auditable than a dedicated e-procurement system. While the contract start date and duration are known, the classified financing information hinders practical planning for suppliers.
•No electronic submission platform; email submission required.
•Financing information (estimated value) is classified.
Data Consistency50/100
A major inconsistency is the inclusion of Document 1, which refers to the University of Plymouth instead of Hounslow Council. Additionally, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are listed as 'None' in the structured data, which contradicts the clear description of it being a market engagement notice.
•Inconsistent document content (Document 1 refers to a different organization).
•Structured data fields 'Type' and 'Procedure' are 'None' despite clear description.
Sustainability30/100
The tender notice does not explicitly mention any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or a focus on innovation. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into the procurement process.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social aspects mentioned.