Tenders

Renowacja Wieży Kuldjala

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 10 dni
Marzec 13, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Budownictwo
Numer Referencyjny
305545
Wartość
€150,000
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Published
Luty 13, 2026
Kod CPV
Kryteria oceny
Total cost of the bid100%
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Luty 13, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Marzec 06, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 13, 2026

Otwarcie ofert

Marzec 13, 2026

Prawdopodobieństwo wygranejPRO
🔒
Uaktualnij do Professional
Zobacz szacowane prawdopodobieństwo wygranej na podstawie danych historycznych.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analiza sektoraPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analizę sektora
Zobacz średnie ceny zwycięskie, poziomy konkurencji i trendy rynkowe.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
€150,000
Duration
5 months
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Type
Budownictwo
67
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra
Benchmark rynkowy
Śr. cena wygrywająca
€524,963
Śr. liczba ofert
4.7
Konkurencja
Średnia
Zwycięzcy MŚP
94%
5,932 przeanalizowanych zamówień

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Celem jest wysokiej jakości, terminowa i optymalna kosztowo renowacja Wieży Kuldjala.
Electronic Submission

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

17 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (7)
Obowiązkowe (2)
Zgodność (5)
Techniczne (2)
Finansowe (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Submit confirmation of compliance with the tender documents (ref. 305545_vastavustingimused.pdf).
--In case of a joint bid, submit a power of attorney (ref. 305545_vastavustingimused.pdf).
--Submit the total cost of the bid (excluding VAT) (ref. 305545_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf, Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.ods).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The bidder and its subcontractors must not have criminal convictions related to trustworthiness (ref. 305545_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused.pdf).
--The bidder and its subcontractors must not have any other exclusion grounds as specified in the tender documents (ref. 305545_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf, RHAD.pdf).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bid must comply with the tender documents (ref. 305545_vastavustingimused.pdf).
--The bidder must possess specific operating licenses required for performing the works (ref. 305545_vastavustingimused.pdf).
--The bidder must be capable of fulfilling the technical description and quality requirements for the renovation of Kuldjala Tower (ref. Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus Kuldjala.pdf).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The project manager must have managed at least two cultural monument conservation or restoration projects as a contractor's project manager within the last five years (ref. Lisa 4 Projektijuhi CV.docx).
--The bidder must be capable of performing the Kuldjala Tower renovation works according to the technical description and quality requirements (ref. Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus Kuldjala.pdf).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid must include the total cost excluding VAT (ref. 305545_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf).

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

8 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305545_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors and grounds for their exclusion during the contract execution phase, requiring the tenderer to provide answers regarding subcontractors' criminal convictions and trustworthiness.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305545_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.7 KB

This document outlines tender submission conditions, requiring bidders to confirm compliance with procurement documents, possession of specific activity licenses, and submission of a power of attorney for joint tenders.

Lisa 4 Pojektijuhi CVDOC
Lisa 4 Projektijuhi CV.docx -- 18.4 KB

This document is a project manager's CV template, requiring the project manager to have experience in leading at least two cultural monument conservation or restoration projects as a contractor's project manager within the last five years.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305545_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation methodology, stating that the total bid cost (excluding VAT) is the sole criterion, weighted at 100%, with the lowest bid receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305545_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.4 KB

This explanatory ESPD document outlines the qualification and exclusion criteria for the Kuldjala tower renovation tender, serving as an informative guide for completing the electronically submitted ESPD, and is not to be filled out directly.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus KuldjalaPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus Kuldjala.pdf -- 387.5 KB

This document is the technical description for the renovation works of Kuldjala Tower, defining the scope, quality requirements, and boundaries of the works, and is an integral part of the procurement documents.

Lisa 3 lepingu tingimusedPDF
Lisa 3 lepingu tingimused.pdf -- 301.0 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract for the renovation of Kuldjala torn, outlining client and contractor details, work deadlines, and payment terms.

RHADPDF
RHAD.pdf -- 81.5 KB

This document is the basic procurement document for the Kuldjala Tower renovation, outlining general terms, the subject of the contract, estimated cost, and procurement procedure.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

67
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender for Kuldjala Tower renovation presents a mixed quality assessment, demonstrating good completeness and practicality but suffering from critical inconsistencies in legal compliance, clarity, and data consistency, primarily due to an incorrect CPV code and contradictory evaluation criteria.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami55/100

The tender has a significant legal compliance issue due to the incorrect CPV code (6606 for financial services instead of renovation works). Additionally, the contradiction between 'Negotiation Allowed / relative_weighting' and 'lowest price' as the sole evaluation criterion raises concerns about adherence to procurement regulations for an open procedure.

Incorrect CPV code assigned (6606 instead of a construction/renovation CPV).
Contradiction between stated procedure characteristics (negotiation allowed, relative weighting) and evaluation criteria (lowest price as sole criterion).
Przejrzystość60/100

While most requirements are clearly documented and refer to specific files, the fundamental contradiction regarding the evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price) creates significant ambiguity for bidders. This lack of clarity on how bids will truly be assessed is a major drawback.

Contradictory information on evaluation criteria: 'relative_weighting' is stated, but Document 2 specifies 'total bid cost (excluding VAT) is the sole criterion, weighted at 100%'.
Ambiguity regarding 'Negotiation Allowed' in an open procedure with a lowest-price-only evaluation.
Kompletność85/100

The tender is comprehensive in terms of providing all necessary basic information, deadlines, value, and a full set of documents including technical specifications, draft contract, and various forms. All essential components for a bidder to prepare an offer are present.

Uczciwość75/100

The tender generally promotes fairness with disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and electronic submission. The project manager's experience requirement, while specific, appears justified for cultural monument renovation and not overly tailored. However, the ambiguity in evaluation criteria could indirectly impact fairness by creating uncertainty for bidders.

Ambiguity in evaluation criteria could lead to perceived unfairness or confusion among bidders.
Praktyczność75/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, which enhances practicality for bidders. The duration is clearly specified. The absence of an explicit contract start date (beyond 'after signing') and specific financing information are minor points that do not significantly hinder practicality.

Contract start date is not explicitly stated, only implied as 'after signing'.
Spójność danych55/100

The tender suffers from significant data inconsistencies. The CPV code is incorrect for the subject matter, and there is a direct contradiction between the stated evaluation criteria and procedure characteristics. These inconsistencies can lead to confusion and potential legal challenges.

Inconsistency between the CPV code and the tender's subject matter.
Inconsistency between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' and 'Negotiation Allowed' in characteristics versus 'lowest bid is sole criterion (100%)' in Document 2.
Zrównoważony rozwój50/100

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While not always mandatory for renovation projects, their absence means the tender does not contribute to broader sustainability goals.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No social aspects included.

Mocne strony

All essential tender documents are provided, including technical specifications and draft contract.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing accessibility.
Estimated value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable for preparation.
Requirements are generally well-documented with clear references to specific files.

Wątpliwości

Incorrect CPV code assigned, misrepresenting the nature of the procurement.
Significant contradiction in evaluation criteria and procedure characteristics, leading to ambiguity.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation considerations.
Internal data inconsistencies regarding key procurement details.

Rekomendacje

1. Correct the CPV code to accurately reflect renovation works (e.g., 45453000-7).
2. Clarify and harmonize the evaluation criteria and procedure type to remove contradictions regarding relative weighting, lowest price, and negotiation.
3. Consider integrating sustainability, social, or innovation aspects where applicable for future tenders to promote broader public policy objectives.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u