Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

CCTV-tilbud

Åpen
Frist
60 dager igjen
juni 14, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Restricted Procedure
Referanse
022470-2026
Verdi
£648,000
Sted
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, Storbritannia
Publisert
april 08, 2026
Organisasjon
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

mars 12, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

juni 07, 2026

Frist for innlevering

juni 14, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

juni 14, 2026

Budsjett
£648,000
Varighet
51 måneder
Sted
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire
Type
Restricted Procedure
72
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Archway Learning Trust gjennomfører en oppgradering av sin CCTV-infrastruktur på tvers av organisasjonen for å modernisere dekning, forbedre sikkerhet og sikre langsiktig vedlikeholdbarhet. Dette programmet er en del av en treårig fornyelsesplan. Åpne dager vil bli holdt 1. og 2. april ved 4 akademier i Nottingham, slik at leverandører kan besøke stedene. Leverandører forventes å gi tilbud og anbefalinger basert på stedbesøk, inkludert en prisliste over alle kostnader.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

11 krav på tvers av 4 kategorier

Innlevering (4)
Overholdelse (3)
Teknisk (3)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Open days will be hosted on April 1st and 2nd at 4 academies in Nottingham for site visits.
--Suppliers are expected to provide quotes and recommendations based on site tours.
--Suppliers must submit a pricing matrix detailing all costs.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Suppliers must be able to provide quotes and recommendations based on site tours.
--Suppliers must provide a pricing matrix listing all costs, including project costs, individual camera costs, and any additional costs.
--Suppliers must hold their quoted price until the end of the tender.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender is for a Trust-wide upgrade of CCTV infrastructure.
--The upgrade aims to modernise coverage, improve safeguarding, and ensure long-term maintainability.
--The programme aligns with strategic aims for improved security, reduced on-site hardware footprint, and standardisation.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The value of the tender is 648,000 EUR.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
022470-2026_ocds_record.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
022470-2026_ocds_release.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
022470-2026_official.pdf

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

72
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender offers a moderate level of quality, with a clear description of objectives and a good disclosure of financial and timeline information. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability, and the submission process could be more streamlined.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender has a clear CPV code and NUTS code. The procedure type is 'Competitive flexible procedure' which is generally acceptable. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria could pose a risk. Deadlines are present but the submission deadline might be perceived as short given the site visits required.

Missing evaluation criteria
Klarhet70/100

The description of the project objectives (modernisation, safeguarding, maintainability, standardisation) is clear. The requirements for suppliers to provide quotes and recommendations based on site tours and a pricing matrix are understandable. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how submissions will be judged.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fullstendighet75/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is present. The CPV and NUTS codes are provided. Site visit dates are specified. However, the lack of content for the attached tender documents is a significant gap.

No document content available
Rettferdighet80/100

The tender is accessible to multiple suppliers ('Restricted' type, but not explicitly named). The estimated value is disclosed. The open days and site tours are a positive step towards providing suppliers with necessary information. The requirement to hold price until the end of the tender is standard. No overtly tailored requirements for specific companies are apparent.

Praktisk gjennomførbarhet60/100

The tender specifies site visits on specific dates, which is helpful for understanding the scope. However, there is no explicit mention of e-submission, and the contract start date being the same as the submission deadline is highly impractical and likely an error.

Contract start date is the same as submission deadline
No explicit e-submission method specified
Datakonsistens95/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The contract duration is logical. There are no reported disputes. The dates provided, while some are problematic (contract start), are otherwise consistently presented.

Bærekraft30/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation in the tender description or AI-extracted requirements. The tender also does not indicate if it is EU funded.

No green procurement requirements
No social criteria mentioned

Styrker

Clear project objectives and description
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Site visit opportunities provided
CPV and NUTS codes included

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
Contract start date impractical
No sustainability considerations
Lack of document content

Anbefalinger

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for submissions.
2. Correct the contract start date to be realistic after contract award.
3. Incorporate sustainability and innovation aspects where applicable.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline