Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

CCTV Udbud

Åben
Frist
60 dage tilbage
Juni 14, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Restricted Procedure
Reference
022470-2026
Værdi
£648,000
Lokation
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, Storbritannien
Udgivet
April 08, 2026
Organisation
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 12, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

Juni 07, 2026

Frist for tilbud

Juni 14, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Juni 14, 2026

Budget
£648,000
Varighed
51 måneder
Lokation
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire
Type
Restricted Procedure
72
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Archway Learning Trust foretager en opgradering af sin CCTV-infrastruktur på tværs af organisationen for at modernisere dækningen, forbedre beskyttelsen og sikre langsigtet vedligeholdelse. Dette program er en del af en treårig fornyelsesplan og stemmer overens med organisationens strategiske mål om forbedret sikkerhed, reduceret hardware-aftryk på stedet og standardisering på tværs af alle akademier. Den 1. og 2. april afholder vi åbent hus på 4 akademier i Nottingham for at give leverandørerne mulighed for at besøge stedet og foretage en fuld rundvisning. Dette vil omfatte rundvisninger på alle vores lokationer, og vi vil levere kort over de første 4 skoler, der skal færdiggøres i 2026. Vi forventer, at leverandørerne leverer tilbud og anbefalinger baseret på rundvisningerne på skolerne, og fremlægger en prismatrix, der angiver alle omkostninger, herunder: projektomkostninger, individuelle kameraomkostninger og eventuelle yderligere omkostninger, vi måtte blive pålagt. Vi forventer, at leverandørerne fastholder denne pris indtil udbuddets afslutning.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. I øjeblikket understøttet: Estland, Letland, Litauen, Polen, Frankrig, Storbritannien, Danmark, Holland, Norge og Finland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

11 krav på tværs af 4 kategorier

Indsendelse (4)
Overholdelse (3)
Teknisk (3)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Open days will be hosted on April 1st and 2nd at 4 academies in Nottingham for site visits.
--Suppliers are expected to provide quotes and recommendations based on site tours.
--Suppliers must submit a pricing matrix detailing all costs.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Suppliers must be able to provide quotes and recommendations based on site tours.
--Suppliers must provide a pricing matrix listing all costs, including project costs, individual camera costs, and any additional costs.
--Suppliers must hold their quoted price until the end of the tender.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender is for a Trust-wide upgrade of CCTV infrastructure.
--The upgrade aims to modernise coverage, improve safeguarding, and ensure long-term maintainability.
--The programme aligns with strategic aims for improved security, reduced on-site hardware footprint, and standardisation.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The value of the tender is 648,000 EUR.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

OCDS RecordDOC
022470-2026_ocds_record.json

Intet resumé tilgængeligt for dette dokument.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
022470-2026_ocds_release.json

Intet resumé tilgængeligt for dette dokument.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
022470-2026_official.pdf

Intet resumé tilgængeligt for dette dokument.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

72
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender offers a moderate level of quality, with a clear description of objectives and a good disclosure of financial and timeline information. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability, and the submission process could be more streamlined.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender has a clear CPV code and NUTS code. The procedure type is 'Competitive flexible procedure' which is generally acceptable. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria could pose a risk. Deadlines are present but the submission deadline might be perceived as short given the site visits required.

Missing evaluation criteria
Klarhed70/100

The description of the project objectives (modernisation, safeguarding, maintainability, standardisation) is clear. The requirements for suppliers to provide quotes and recommendations based on site tours and a pricing matrix are understandable. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how submissions will be judged.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed75/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is present. The CPV and NUTS codes are provided. Site visit dates are specified. However, the lack of content for the attached tender documents is a significant gap.

No document content available
Retfærdighed80/100

The tender is accessible to multiple suppliers ('Restricted' type, but not explicitly named). The estimated value is disclosed. The open days and site tours are a positive step towards providing suppliers with necessary information. The requirement to hold price until the end of the tender is standard. No overtly tailored requirements for specific companies are apparent.

Praktisk anvendelighed60/100

The tender specifies site visits on specific dates, which is helpful for understanding the scope. However, there is no explicit mention of e-submission, and the contract start date being the same as the submission deadline is highly impractical and likely an error.

Contract start date is the same as submission deadline
No explicit e-submission method specified
Datakonsistens95/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The contract duration is logical. There are no reported disputes. The dates provided, while some are problematic (contract start), are otherwise consistently presented.

Bæredygtighed30/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation in the tender description or AI-extracted requirements. The tender also does not indicate if it is EU funded.

No green procurement requirements
No social criteria mentioned

Styrker

Clear project objectives and description
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Site visit opportunities provided
CPV and NUTS codes included

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
Contract start date impractical
No sustainability considerations
Lack of document content

Anbefalinger

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for submissions.
2. Correct the contract start date to be realistic after contract award.
3. Incorporate sustainability and innovation aspects where applicable.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Tilføj til pipeline