Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Totalrådgivning for renovering av Lærkeskolen i Egedal kommune

Åpen
Frist
1 dager igjen
april 17, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Annet
Referanse
00164624-2026
Verdi
kr37,000,000
Sted
Hovedstaden, Denmark
Publisert
april 08, 2026
Organisasjon
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

mars 10, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

april 10, 2026

Frist for innlevering

april 17, 2026

Budsjett
kr37,000,000
Varighet
Ikke spesifisert
Sted
Hovedstaden
Type
Annet
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Disse anbudsbetingelsene gjelder Egedal kommunes anbud på en totalrådgiveravtale vedrørende renovering av eksisterende skole kalt "Lærkeskolen", Præstegårdsvej 30, i Stenløse. Totalrådgiveren skal bistå Egedal kommune i en omfattende renovering av Lærkeskolen, og Egedal kommune har behov for totalrådgivning i forbindelse med avklaring, avgrensning, planlegging, programmering, forundersøkelser, inkludert destruktive og miljøundersøkelser, prosjektering, utlysning og rådgivning under utførelse.

Kjør risikoanalyse

Identifiser potensielle risikoer, inkonsekvenser og varsellamper i alle anbudsunderlag. Få en detaljert risikorapport med alvorlighetsgrader og anbefalinger for risikoreduserende tiltak.

Logg inn

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

16 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (3)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (3)
Teknisk (7)
Finansiell (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Deadline for submission: 2026-04-17 10:00:00.
--The tender is an Open Procedure.
--Bidders must provide services in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, Lithuanian, French, and Danish.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be a Totalrådgiver (Total Advisor).
--Must be able to assist Egedal Kommune in a comprehensive renovation of Lærkeskolen.
--Must provide totalrådgivning (total advisory services) for clarification, delimitation, planning, programming, preliminary investigations (including destructive and environmental investigations), project design, tendering, and advisory services during execution and handover.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Ability to manage a project divided into multiple sub-tasks executed sequentially due to the school's continued operation.
--Experience in planning, programming, preliminary investigations (including destructive and environmental investigations).
--Experience in project design and preparation of tender materials.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 37,000,000 EUR.
--No specific financial thresholds or guarantees are mentioned in the provided text.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererte sammendrag av alle anbudsunderlag. Forstå raskt hva hvert dokument inneholder uten å lese hundrevis av sider – som dekker omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og viktige forpliktelser.

Logg inn
75
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for total advisory services for the renovation of Lærkeskolen is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and potentially practicality.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and utilizes a standard CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the process appears regulatory compliant. No disputes are indicated. The submission deadline is relatively short given the complexity and value of the project, which could be a minor concern for legal compliance regarding reasonable timelines.

Submission deadline may be too short for the scope of work.
Klarhet80/100

The description of the required services is detailed, outlining the phases and specific tasks expected from the total advisor. The requirements for technical capability are also clearly extracted. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Evaluation criteria are not specified.
Fullstendighet70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and CPV code. The description provides a good overview of the project scope and phases. However, crucial details such as the contract duration and the specific content of the tender documents are not fully accessible or specified, impacting overall completeness.

Contract duration is not specified.
Full content of tender documents is not readily available.
Rettferdighet85/100

The tender is an open procedure, ensuring broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility and technical capability are objective and based on the project's needs. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is practical. However, the lack of explicit information on contract start date and duration, along with the absence of readily accessible full tender document content, reduces practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

Contract start date is not specified.
Full tender document content is not readily available.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and submission deadline are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

Bærekraft50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While the project involves renovation, which can have sustainability implications, these are not highlighted as specific requirements or evaluation criteria. The mention of EU funding is absent.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Styrker

Clear project scope and phased approach outlined.
Open procedure ensures broad participation.
E-procurement utilized.
Objective technical capability requirements.

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria.
Contract duration and start date not specified.
Full tender document content not readily accessible.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.

Anbefalinger

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
2. Provide details on contract duration and start date.
3. Ensure full tender documents are easily accessible to all potential bidders.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline