Wil je inschrijven op overheidsaanbestedingen? Bekijk onze TaaS aanbestedingsvoorbereidingsservice
Aanbestedingen

Totale adviesdiensten voor de renovatie van Lærkeskolen in de gemeente Egedal

Open
Deadline
1 dagen resterend
April 17, 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Overig
Referentie
00164624-2026
Waarde
kr37,000,000
Locatie
Hovedstaden, Denmark
Gepubliceerd
April 08, 2026
Organisatie
CPV-code
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

Maart 10, 2026

Deadline voor vragen

April 10, 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

April 17, 2026

Budget
kr37,000,000
Looptijd
Niet gespecificeerd
Locatie
Hovedstaden
Type
Overig
75
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

Deze aanbestedingsvoorwaarden betreffen de aanbesteding van de gemeente Egedal voor een totale adviesovereenkomst betreffende de renovatie van de bestaande school genaamd "Lærkeskolen", Præstegårdsvej 30, in Stenløse. De totale adviseur zal de gemeente Egedal assisteren bij een alomvattende renovatie van Lærkeskolen, en de gemeente Egedal heeft totale adviesdiensten nodig in verband met het verduidelijken, afbakenen, plannen, programmeren, vooronderzoeken, inclusief destructieve en milieuonderzoeken, projectontwerp, aanbesteding en adviesdiensten tijdens de uitvoering.

Risicoanalyse uitvoeren

Identificeer potentiële risico's, inconsistenties en rode vlaggen in alle aanbestedingsdocumenten. Ontvang een gedetailleerd risicorapport met ernstniveaus en aanbevelingen voor mitigatie.

Inloggen

Winststrategie

Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.

Inloggen

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

16 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (3)
Verplicht (1)
Naleving (3)
Technisch (7)
Financieel (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Deadline for submission: 2026-04-17 10:00:00.
--The tender is an Open Procedure.
--Bidders must provide services in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, Lithuanian, French, and Danish.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be a Totalrådgiver (Total Advisor).
--Must be able to assist Egedal Kommune in a comprehensive renovation of Lærkeskolen.
--Must provide totalrådgivning (total advisory services) for clarification, delimitation, planning, programming, preliminary investigations (including destructive and environmental investigations), project design, tendering, and advisory services during execution and handover.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Ability to manage a project divided into multiple sub-tasks executed sequentially due to the school's continued operation.
--Experience in planning, programming, preliminary investigations (including destructive and environmental investigations).
--Experience in project design and preparation of tender materials.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 37,000,000 EUR.
--No specific financial thresholds or guarantees are mentioned in the provided text.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

Ontvang door AI gegenereerde samenvattingen van alle aanbestedingsdocumenten. Begrijp snel wat elk document bevat zonder honderden pagina's te lezen – met betrekking tot scope, voorwaarden, gunningscriteria en belangrijke verplichtingen.

Inloggen
75
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender for total advisory services for the renovation of Lærkeskolen is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and potentially practicality.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving75/100

The tender follows an open procedure and utilizes a standard CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the process appears regulatory compliant. No disputes are indicated. The submission deadline is relatively short given the complexity and value of the project, which could be a minor concern for legal compliance regarding reasonable timelines.

Submission deadline may be too short for the scope of work.
Duidelijkheid80/100

The description of the required services is detailed, outlining the phases and specific tasks expected from the total advisor. The requirements for technical capability are also clearly extracted. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Evaluation criteria are not specified.
Volledigheid70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and CPV code. The description provides a good overview of the project scope and phases. However, crucial details such as the contract duration and the specific content of the tender documents are not fully accessible or specified, impacting overall completeness.

Contract duration is not specified.
Full content of tender documents is not readily available.
Eerlijkheid85/100

The tender is an open procedure, ensuring broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility and technical capability are objective and based on the project's needs. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Praktische uitvoerbaarheid65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is practical. However, the lack of explicit information on contract start date and duration, along with the absence of readily accessible full tender document content, reduces practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

Contract start date is not specified.
Full tender document content is not readily available.
Gegevensconsistentie90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and submission deadline are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

Duurzaamheid50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While the project involves renovation, which can have sustainability implications, these are not highlighted as specific requirements or evaluation criteria. The mention of EU funding is absent.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Sterke punten

Clear project scope and phased approach outlined.
Open procedure ensures broad participation.
E-procurement utilized.
Objective technical capability requirements.

Aandachtspunten

Missing evaluation criteria.
Contract duration and start date not specified.
Full tender document content not readily accessible.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.

Aanbevelingen

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
2. Provide details on contract duration and start date.
3. Ensure full tender documents are easily accessible to all potential bidders.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten

Toevoegen aan pipeline