Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

ESCC - AW - SESLIP Godkjent Liste

Åpen
Frist
207 dager igjen
desember 14, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Referanse
030907-2021
Verdi
£5,000,000
Sted
Surrey, East and West Sussex, Storbritannia
Publisert
mai 14, 2026
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

desember 13, 2021

Frist for spørsmål

desember 07, 2026

Frist for innlevering

desember 14, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

desember 13, 2021

Budsjett
£5,000,000
Varighet
61 måneder
Sted
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
71
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

SESLIP oppfordrer til og støtter det politiske og profesjonelle lederskapet og ledelsen av lokale barneomsorgstjenester for å demonstrere, utvikle og dele god praksis. Våre programmer støtter utviklingen av barneomsorgstjenester som lærende organisasjoner, med fokus på:• identifisering av sentrale undersøkelsesområder• analyse og sammenligning av operasjonelle data om tjenestene• bruk av bevis for å informere beslutninger, inkludert bevis tilgjengelig utenfor regionen, der det er relevant• bruk av fagfellevurdering og fagfellevurdering• oppbygging av ledelseskapasitet og -kompetanse• utvikling av praksisstandarder gjennom støttende innsatsDet finnes en Regional Forbedringsplan som skisserer aktivitetene. Målet er å identifisere måter lokale myndigheter i Sørøst-England kan støtte hverandre for å forbedre seg, og se på hvordan kollektiv handling kan bidra til å løse systemiske problemer i regionen. Denne godkjente listen er for passende kvalifiserte frilansere.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

17 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (3)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (3)
Teknisk (9)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-12-14 12:00:00.
--Applications must be for inclusion on an Approved List for freelance consultants.
--The submission must demonstrate how the bidder meets the criteria for a "suitably qualified freelance consultant" for SESLIP's objectives.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must be a suitably qualified freelance consultant.
--The bidder must possess qualifications relevant to supporting Children's Services leadership and management.
--The bidder must be able to operate as a freelance entity/individual.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Demonstrate expertise in supporting political and professional leadership and management of local authority Children’s Services.
--Possess capability in developing Children’s Services as learning organisations.
--Ability to identify key strands of enquiry relevant to Children's Services improvement.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, specific insurance levels) are detailed in the provided tender information.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
030907-2021_ocds_record.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
030907-2021_ocds_release.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
030907-2021_official.pdf

This document is a contract notice for an Approved List of suitably qualified freelance consultants to support the South East Children's Services Improvement Partnership (SESLIP) in developing Children's Services.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

71
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for an Approved List of freelance consultants for Children's Services leadership support suffers from a critical lack of detailed documentation and explicit evaluation criteria, significantly hindering transparency and fair competition.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar100/100

The absence of detailed tender documents, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and explicit evaluation criteria raises significant concerns regarding compliance with public procurement principles of transparency, equal treatment, and proportionality. While an 'Approved List' procedure allows for flexibility, the fundamental lack of documentation is problematic for a tender of this estimated value.

Absence of detailed tender documents
Lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds (beyond general statement)
Klarhet40/100

While the description of the service need is clear, the practical application of requirements for bidders is unclear due to the absence of supporting documents, detailed submission guidelines, and specific evaluation criteria. Bidders lack sufficient information on how their qualifications and capabilities will be objectively assessed.

Lack of detailed submission instructions
Ambiguity regarding how 'suitably qualified' and technical capabilities will be objectively assessed
Fullstendighet83/100

The tender information provided is severely incomplete. Key elements such as full tender documents, detailed instructions for bidders, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and, crucially, comprehensive evaluation criteria are missing. This makes it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant submission.

Missing full tender documents
Absence of detailed evaluation criteria
Rettferdighet80/100

The critical lack of detailed evaluation criteria and supporting tender documents creates a high risk of subjective assessment, potentially undermining the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination. Without clear, predefined rules, it is difficult to ensure all bidders are judged on the same objective basis, raising concerns about potential for bias.

High risk of subjective evaluation due to missing criteria
Potential for unequal treatment without clear guidelines
Praktisk gjennomførbarhet40/100

From a bidder's perspective, the tender is impractical due to the lack of essential information required to formulate a competitive and compliant bid. The contracting authority may also face significant challenges in objectively evaluating submissions without predefined criteria and a structured process, potentially leading to disputes or delays.

Bidders cannot adequately prepare without full documentation
Challenges for the contracting authority in conducting objective evaluation
Datakonsistens100/100

The provided data is internally consistent within its limited scope. However, the absence of full tender documents prevents a comprehensive assessment of data consistency across a complete tender package.

Bærekraft25/100

The tender description's focus on 'developing Children’s Services as learning organisations' and 'building leadership capacity' aligns with long-term service improvement. However, the tender lacks explicit green procurement or social criteria, which are increasingly important aspects of broader sustainability considerations in public procurement.

Absence of explicit green procurement criteria
Absence of explicit social criteria

Styrker

Clear identification of the service need and objectives (Children's Services improvement)
Open procedure type encourages broad participation
Focus on 'Innovation Focus' and 'Approved List' allows for flexibility and access to specialized expertise
Reasonable contract duration (61 months) for an Approved List
Estimated value disclosed

Bekymringer

Critical absence of full tender documents and detailed evaluation criteria
High risk of subjective assessment due to vague requirements and missing evaluation methodology
Lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed financial requirements creates uncertainty
Potential for reduced competition and legal challenges due to insufficient information for bidders
No explicit social or green procurement criteria, despite the nature of the service

Anbefalinger

1. Immediately publish comprehensive tender documents, including detailed instructions for bidders, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and clear, objective evaluation criteria with scoring mechanisms.
2. Provide explicit guidance on how 'suitably qualified' and technical capabilities will be assessed to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Consider incorporating relevant social and green procurement criteria where applicable to align with broader public policy objectives and enhance sustainability.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline