Wil je inschrijven op overheidsaanbestedingen? Bekijk onze TaaS aanbestedingsvoorbereidingsservice
Aanbestedingen

Strategische partner voor de exploitatie van 2 residentiële kinderhuizen in Bath & North East Somerset

Open
Deadline
8 dagen resterend
April 24, 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Open Procedure
Referentie
024024-2026
Waarde
£41,760,000
Locatie
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, Verenigd Koninkrijk
Gepubliceerd
April 08, 2026
CPV-code
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

Maart 17, 2026

Deadline voor vragen

April 17, 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

April 24, 2026

Startdatum contract

Augustus 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Buyer Intelligence
Bekijk uitgavenpatronen, voorkeursprocedures en meer.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Budget
£41,760,000
Looptijd
120 maanden
Locatie
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

B&NES Council zoekt een strategische partner voor de exploitatie van twee kindertehuizen met 4 bedden voor kinderen van 11-18 jaar met autisme en complexe behoeften op het gebied van sociale, emotionele en mentale gezondheid. De diensten starten op 1 september 2027. Aanbieders moeten beschikken over bestaande Ofsted-geregistreerde kindertehuizen.

Risicoanalyse

Risicoanalyse is nog niet beschikbaar voor aanbestedingen uit dit land. Momenteel ondersteund: Estland, Letland, Litouwen, Polen, Frankrijk, VK, Denemarken, Nederland, Noorwegen en Finland.

Winststrategie

Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.

Inloggen

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

16 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (1)
Verplicht (1)
Naleving (3)
Technisch (8)
Financieel (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text, beyond the general tender process.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Potential providers must already operate existing Ofsted Registered Residential Children's Homes.
--Providers must be able to demonstrate knowledge and competence of successfully achieving Ofsted Registration and delivering an Ofsted compliant service.
--Providers must be able to demonstrate specialist experience, qualification and knowledge regarding the care of children and young people with Autism and complex needs.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Ability to operate two 4-bed children's homes for children aged 11-18 with autism and complex social, emotional, and mental health needs.
--Ability to provide sleep-in staff provision.
--Ability to provide living and support spaces.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The published contract value is a maximum value based on the full contract term (including full extension).
--The value includes an estimation of additional costs to meet individual care needs.
--The value is based on 100% occupancy of both homes.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

3 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

OCDS RecordDOC
024024-2026_ocds_record.json

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
024024-2026_ocds_release.json

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
024024-2026_official.pdf

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

75
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender for operating children's homes is generally well-structured with clear objectives and financial information. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting practicality and potentially fairness.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and a competitive flexible procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity. No disputes are noted. The regulatory compliance is assumed to be met by the organization.

Duidelijkheid80/100

The description of the service is clear, outlining the specific needs of the children and the council's objectives. Requirements for providers are documented, focusing on operational experience and specialist knowledge. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Volledigheid70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The contract start date is specified. However, the content of the tender documents is not available, and specific submission requirements are not detailed, which affects overall completeness.

No document content available
No specific submission requirements detailed
Eerlijkheid85/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and duration, and the criteria for eligibility are objective and based on demonstrable experience. The procedure is open, and market engagement events were held. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria could lead to perceived subjectivity, and the absence of e-submission details might limit accessibility.

Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission details
Praktische uitvoerbaarheid65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. Financing information is implicitly linked to the estimated value. However, the lack of explicit e-submission details and the absence of document content hinder practical engagement for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Gegevensconsistentie90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The contract start date and duration are consistent with the project's scope.

Duurzaamheid50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects beyond the core service, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria mentioned

Sterke punten

Clear description of service needs and objectives
Well-defined eligibility and technical capability requirements
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration
Open procedure with prior market engagement

Aandachtspunten

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Lack of available tender document content
Absence of explicit e-submission details
Limited focus on sustainability aspects

Aanbevelingen

1. Publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency.
2. Make all tender documents readily accessible, preferably through an e-procurement portal.
3. Consider incorporating specific sustainability or innovation requirements if applicable.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten

Toevoegen aan pipeline