Wil je inschrijven op overheidsaanbestedingen? Bekijk onze TaaS aanbestedingsvoorbereidingsservice
Aanbestedingen

001510- Milton St Johns School Externe werkzaamheden

Open
Deadline
8 dagen resterend
April 24, 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Open Procedure
Referentie
028382-2026
Waarde
£394,000
Locatie
Greater Manchester, Verenigd Koninkrijk
Gepubliceerd
April 08, 2026
CPV-code
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

Maart 27, 2026

Deadline voor vragen

April 17, 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

April 24, 2026

Startdatum contract

Juni 29, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Buyer Intelligence
Bekijk uitgavenpatronen, voorkeursprocedures en meer.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Budget
£394,000
Looptijd
2 maanden
Locatie
Greater Manchester
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

Tameside Council zoekt een aannemer voor werkzaamheden aan het vervangen van platte daken, volledige raamvervanging en uitgebreid voegwerk op alle gevels van Milton St Johns School.

Risicoanalyse

Risicoanalyse is nog niet beschikbaar voor aanbestedingen uit dit land. Momenteel ondersteund: Estland, Letland, Litouwen, Polen, Frankrijk, VK, Denemarken, Nederland, Noorwegen en Finland.

Winststrategie

Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.

Inloggen

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

18 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (11)
Verplicht (1)
Naleving (2)
Technisch (3)
Financieel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS11
--Submissions must be received by the Council by the closing date and time stated within the Instruction for Tendering document.
--No submission received after the closing date and time will be accepted, except in exceptional circumstances considered by the Director of STAR Procurement.
--Tender submissions which are only partly uploaded at the closing date and time will be considered not received and will be rejected.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text. Bidders should refer to the full tender documents for these.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be a suitably qualified contractor.
--Must register interest to receive full specification.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be able to undertake Works to replace all flat roofing areas.
--Must be able to undertake full window replacement.
--Must be able to undertake extensive pointing across all elevations.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text. Bidders should refer to the full tender documents for these.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

3 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

OCDS RecordDOC
028382-2026_ocds_record.json

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
028382-2026_ocds_release.json

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
028382-2026_official.pdf

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

75
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender for external works at Milton St Johns School is generally well-structured, with clear submission requirements and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects, and relies heavily on external documentation.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving75/100

The tender adheres to open competition procedures for below-threshold procurements. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no immediate indications of disputes. Deadlines are provided, though the duration might be considered short for the scope. The reliance on 'The Chest' for full documentation and submission is a procedural standard.

Duidelijkheid80/100

The description of works (roofing, windows, pointing) is clear. Eligibility and technical requirements are outlined, and submission procedures are explicitly stated. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria within the provided text reduces overall clarity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Volledigheid70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. Contract duration and start date are specified. However, the full specification is only available upon registration, and no content is provided for the attached documents, impacting completeness.

Full specification requires registration
No document content available
Eerlijkheid85/100

The tender is open to all qualified contractors, and the estimated value is disclosed. The process emphasizes e-submission through 'The Chest' and explicitly states that amendments to terms and conditions will not be accepted, promoting equal treatment. There are no apparent tailored requirements for specific companies.

Praktische uitvoerbaarheid65/100

E-submission is mandated through 'The Chest', which is a standard e-procurement platform. The contract start date and duration are provided. However, the reliance on external registration for full specifications and the lack of explicit financing information could pose minor practical challenges.

Full specification requires registration on external platform
Gegevensconsistentie90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logical and do not indicate suspension or disputes. The CPV code and NUTS code are present.

Duurzaamheid50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided tender details. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Sterke punten

Clear description of works
Mandatory e-submission via a dedicated platform
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration
Open competition procedure

Aandachtspunten

Lack of specific evaluation criteria
Full specification requires registration and download from external platform
Absence of sustainability considerations
Potential for short contract duration relative to scope

Aanbevelingen

1. Include specific evaluation criteria in the tender documentation.
2. Provide a summary or key excerpts of the full specification within the initial tender notice.
3. Incorporate sustainability objectives and criteria into the tender.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten

Toevoegen aan pipeline