Atgal į konkursus

Nuotekų kanalizacijos projektavimas Tori seniūnijoje, Piistaojos kaime

Uždarytas

Pateikimo terminas pasibaigė

Šio konkurso pateikimo terminas pasibaigė ir paraiškos nebepriimamos. Žemiau pateikta informacija saugoma informaciniais tikslais.

Naršyti aktyvius konkursus
Galutinis terminas
Pasibaigęs
Vasaris 18, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Paslaugos
Nuoroda
305780
Vertė
€4,000
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Vasaris 03, 2026
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Lowest total cost (excluding VAT)100%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 03, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Vasaris 11, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Vasaris 18, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Vasaris 18, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€4,000
Trukmė
Nenurodyta
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Paslaugos
73
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€71,415
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
4.8
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
99%
2,006 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Pirkimo sutarties objektas yra nuotekų kanalizacijos rekonstrukcijos projektavimas Piistaojos kaime, Tori seniūnijoje, pagal viešojo pirkimo dokumentus. Darbų apimtis apima: - apie 85 m slėginio nuotekų vamzdyno; - 1 nuotekų siurblinę. Darbų apimtis apima geodezinius tyrimus pagal techninę užduotį, pagrindinio projekto parengimą su visais reikiamais deriniais ir statybos leidimų prašymą.
Elektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

14 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (8)
Privalomas (1)
Atitiktis (1)
Techninis (2)
Finansinis (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--The bid must be submitted electronically in the e-procurement environment according to the predefined structure.
--Business secrets must be clearly marked in the bid.
--The bid must include acceptance of the tender conditions (including the draft contract agreement).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer and each joint tenderer must confirm that there are no grounds for exclusion from the procurement procedure (e.g., crimes, tax debt).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tenderer must hold valid economic activity notices in the field of public water supply and sewerage design.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The scope, objectives, and requirements of the design work must comply with the terms of reference for the reconstruction design of the wastewater pump station and pressure pipeline in Piistaoja village, Tori rural municipality, including standards and underlying documents.
--The tenderer must provide a list of similar design works completed in the last 36 months to prove qualification and experience.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid will be evaluated solely on the basis of the lowest total cost (excluding VAT).
--The bid cost must be presented with a clear structure.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 9 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

VastavustingimusedPDF
305780_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.9 KB

This document outlines tender submission requirements, including declaring business secrets, structuring the offer cost, accepting tender conditions, and providing a power of attorney for joint bids.

Pakkuja (iga ühispakkuja) kinnitus kõrvaldamise aluste puudumise kohtaDOC
Vorm KI.doc -- 26.0 KB

The bidder (and each joint bidder) must submit a confirmation stating that there are no grounds for their exclusion from the procurement procedure, which is required for tender submission.

Pakkuja poolt viimase 36 kuu jooksul teostatud sarnaste projekteerimistööde loet...DOC
Vorm KII.doc -- 32.5 KB

Tenderers must submit a list of similar design works completed within the last 36 months to demonstrate their qualifications and experience.

Pakkumusteade (Vorm PI)DOC
Vorm PI.doc -- 28.5 KB

This document is a tender notice (Form PI) providing a general overview and conditions for the procurement of wastewater sewerage design in Piistaoja village, Tori municipality.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305780_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

Bids for the design of the wastewater sewerage system in Piistaoja village, Tori municipality, will be evaluated solely based on the lowest total cost (excluding VAT), which constitutes 100% of the evaluation criteria.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
305780_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 7.8 KB

This document outlines bidder exclusion grounds (e.g., criminal offenses, tax debt) and qualification conditions, requiring valid economic activity notices in the field of public water supply and sewerage design.

LähteülesannePDF
Lähteülessanne Piistaoja reoveepumpla ja surv... -- 228.9 KB

This document details the scope, objectives, and requirements, including standards and reference documents, for the design work of reconstructing a wastewater pumping station and pressure pipeline in Piistaoja village, Tori municipality.

LepingDOC
Projekteerimise töövõtuleping.docx -- 27.3 KB

This document is a draft design service contract for the reconstruction of wastewater sewerage in Piistaoja village, Tori municipality, with AS Pärnu Vesi as the client.

Ühispakkujate volikiri (Vorm PII)DOC
Vorm PII.doc -- 31.0 KB

This document is a power of attorney for joint tenderers, authorizing one member of a joint bidding group to represent the others in the submission of the tender and throughout the procurement process.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

73
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender is generally well-structured and legally compliant, providing comprehensive documentation and clear requirements for a wastewater design project. However, the exceptionally low estimated value raises significant concerns regarding fairness and practicality, potentially limiting competition and the quality of bids.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams85/100

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements, with a reasonable submission deadline and clear definition of the negotiation procedure. CPV codes are appropriate, and references to the Estonian Public Procurement Act (RHS) indicate compliance with national regulations. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Minor inconsistency between 'relative_weighting' characteristic and explicit 'lowest total cost (100%)' evaluation criteria in documents.
Aiškumas80/100

The project description is clear, detailing the scope of design work for the wastewater system. Requirements for eligibility, technical capability, and submission are well-documented and understandable, supported by specific forms. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as lowest cost.

Conflicting information regarding evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' in characteristics vs. 'lowest total cost' in documents).
Užbaigtumas90/100

The tender is comprehensive, providing all essential information such as title, reference, organization, detailed description, financial data, and timelines. All required documents, including technical specifications, qualification criteria, and contract drafts, are attached and appear to cover all necessary aspects for bidders to prepare a submission.

Sąžiningumas65/100

The tender promotes fairness through electronic submission and e-procurement, ensuring equal access. Evaluation criteria (lowest price) are objective and transparent. Qualification requirements are standard and not tailored. The submission deadline is reasonable.

The estimated value of 4,000 EUR for a design project of this nature appears exceptionally low, which could significantly deter qualified bidders and limit competition.
Praktiškumas55/100

Electronic submission is supported, enhancing practicality for bidders. Financing conditions are referenced in the contract. However, the extremely low estimated value is a major concern.

The extremely low estimated value (4,000 EUR) is unlikely to attract competent design firms, potentially leading to a lack of viable bids or necessitating re-tendering.
The specific project duration is not immediately apparent from the summary.
Duomenų nuoseklumas70/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported suspensions or disputes.

Inconsistency in the evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'lowest total cost').
Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the explicit disclosure of 'Estimated Value: 4,000.00 EUR'.
Tvarumas20/100

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

Complete absence of sustainability considerations.
No green procurement, social, or innovation focus.

Privalumai

Comprehensive documentation with clear requirements.
Legal compliance with national procurement acts and reasonable deadlines.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled for accessibility.
Clear project description and scope of work.
Objective and transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price).

Problemos

Extremely low estimated value (4,000 EUR) for the scope of design work, potentially deterring qualified bidders.
Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. lowest cost).
Lack of any sustainability, green procurement, or social criteria.
Project duration not explicitly stated in the summary.
Potential for limited competition due to low estimated value.

Rekomendacijos

1. Re-evaluate the estimated value to ensure it is realistic and attractive to competent design firms, potentially increasing the budget to foster better competition.
2. Correct the inconsistency in the evaluation criteria description to clearly state 'lowest total cost' across all tender documents and metadata.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability, green procurement, or social responsibility criteria into future tenders, even for design services.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“