Retour aux appels d'offres

Conception du système d'assainissement dans le village de Piistaoja, municipalité de Tori

Fermé

Date limite de soumission dépassée

La date limite de soumission de cet appel d'offres est dépassée et il n'accepte plus de candidatures. Les informations ci-dessous sont conservées à titre de référence.

Parcourir les appels d'offres actifs
Date limite
Expiré
Février 18, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Services
Référence
305780
Valeur
€4,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 03, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Lowest total cost (excluding VAT)100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 03, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Février 11, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Février 18, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Février 18, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€4,000
Durée
Non spécifié
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Services
73
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€71,415
Offres moyennes
4.8
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
99%
2,006 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objet du contrat d'approvisionnement est la conception de la reconstruction du système d'assainissement situé dans le village de Piistaoja, municipalité de Tori, conformément aux documents d'appel d'offres. L'étendue des travaux comprend : - environ 85 m de canalisation d'assainissement sous pression ; - 1 station de pompage des eaux usées. L'étendue des travaux comprend des études géodésiques conformément au cahier des charges, la préparation du projet principal avec toutes les approbations nécessaires et la demande de permis de construire.
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

14 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (8)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (1)
Technique (2)
Financier (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--The bid must be submitted electronically in the e-procurement environment according to the predefined structure.
--Business secrets must be clearly marked in the bid.
--The bid must include acceptance of the tender conditions (including the draft contract agreement).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer and each joint tenderer must confirm that there are no grounds for exclusion from the procurement procedure (e.g., crimes, tax debt).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tenderer must hold valid economic activity notices in the field of public water supply and sewerage design.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The scope, objectives, and requirements of the design work must comply with the terms of reference for the reconstruction design of the wastewater pump station and pressure pipeline in Piistaoja village, Tori rural municipality, including standards and underlying documents.
--The tenderer must provide a list of similar design works completed in the last 36 months to prove qualification and experience.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid will be evaluated solely on the basis of the lowest total cost (excluding VAT).
--The bid cost must be presented with a clear structure.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

9 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
305780_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.9 KB

This document outlines tender submission requirements, including declaring business secrets, structuring the offer cost, accepting tender conditions, and providing a power of attorney for joint bids.

Pakkuja (iga ühispakkuja) kinnitus kõrvaldamise aluste puudumise kohtaDOC
Vorm KI.doc -- 26.0 KB

The bidder (and each joint bidder) must submit a confirmation stating that there are no grounds for their exclusion from the procurement procedure, which is required for tender submission.

Pakkuja poolt viimase 36 kuu jooksul teostatud sarnaste projekteerimistööde loet...DOC
Vorm KII.doc -- 32.5 KB

Tenderers must submit a list of similar design works completed within the last 36 months to demonstrate their qualifications and experience.

Pakkumusteade (Vorm PI)DOC
Vorm PI.doc -- 28.5 KB

This document is a tender notice (Form PI) providing a general overview and conditions for the procurement of wastewater sewerage design in Piistaoja village, Tori municipality.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305780_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

Bids for the design of the wastewater sewerage system in Piistaoja village, Tori municipality, will be evaluated solely based on the lowest total cost (excluding VAT), which constitutes 100% of the evaluation criteria.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
305780_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 7.8 KB

This document outlines bidder exclusion grounds (e.g., criminal offenses, tax debt) and qualification conditions, requiring valid economic activity notices in the field of public water supply and sewerage design.

LähteülesannePDF
Lähteülessanne Piistaoja reoveepumpla ja surv... -- 228.9 KB

This document details the scope, objectives, and requirements, including standards and reference documents, for the design work of reconstructing a wastewater pumping station and pressure pipeline in Piistaoja village, Tori municipality.

LepingDOC
Projekteerimise töövõtuleping.docx -- 27.3 KB

This document is a draft design service contract for the reconstruction of wastewater sewerage in Piistaoja village, Tori municipality, with AS Pärnu Vesi as the client.

Ühispakkujate volikiri (Vorm PII)DOC
Vorm PII.doc -- 31.0 KB

This document is a power of attorney for joint tenderers, authorizing one member of a joint bidding group to represent the others in the submission of the tender and throughout the procurement process.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

73
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender is generally well-structured and legally compliant, providing comprehensive documentation and clear requirements for a wastewater design project. However, the exceptionally low estimated value raises significant concerns regarding fairness and practicality, potentially limiting competition and the quality of bids.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale85/100

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements, with a reasonable submission deadline and clear definition of the negotiation procedure. CPV codes are appropriate, and references to the Estonian Public Procurement Act (RHS) indicate compliance with national regulations. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Minor inconsistency between 'relative_weighting' characteristic and explicit 'lowest total cost (100%)' evaluation criteria in documents.
Clarté80/100

The project description is clear, detailing the scope of design work for the wastewater system. Requirements for eligibility, technical capability, and submission are well-documented and understandable, supported by specific forms. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as lowest cost.

Conflicting information regarding evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' in characteristics vs. 'lowest total cost' in documents).
Exhaustivité90/100

The tender is comprehensive, providing all essential information such as title, reference, organization, detailed description, financial data, and timelines. All required documents, including technical specifications, qualification criteria, and contract drafts, are attached and appear to cover all necessary aspects for bidders to prepare a submission.

Équité65/100

The tender promotes fairness through electronic submission and e-procurement, ensuring equal access. Evaluation criteria (lowest price) are objective and transparent. Qualification requirements are standard and not tailored. The submission deadline is reasonable.

The estimated value of 4,000 EUR for a design project of this nature appears exceptionally low, which could significantly deter qualified bidders and limit competition.
Aspect pratique55/100

Electronic submission is supported, enhancing practicality for bidders. Financing conditions are referenced in the contract. However, the extremely low estimated value is a major concern.

The extremely low estimated value (4,000 EUR) is unlikely to attract competent design firms, potentially leading to a lack of viable bids or necessitating re-tendering.
The specific project duration is not immediately apparent from the summary.
Cohérence des données70/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported suspensions or disputes.

Inconsistency in the evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'lowest total cost').
Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the explicit disclosure of 'Estimated Value: 4,000.00 EUR'.
Durabilité20/100

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

Complete absence of sustainability considerations.
No green procurement, social, or innovation focus.

Points forts

Comprehensive documentation with clear requirements.
Legal compliance with national procurement acts and reasonable deadlines.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled for accessibility.
Clear project description and scope of work.
Objective and transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price).

Préoccupations

Extremely low estimated value (4,000 EUR) for the scope of design work, potentially deterring qualified bidders.
Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. lowest cost).
Lack of any sustainability, green procurement, or social criteria.
Project duration not explicitly stated in the summary.
Potential for limited competition due to low estimated value.

Recommandations

1. Re-evaluate the estimated value to ensure it is realistic and attractive to competent design firms, potentially increasing the budget to foster better competition.
2. Correct the inconsistency in the evaluation criteria description to clearly state 'lowest total cost' across all tender documents and metadata.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability, green procurement, or social responsibility criteria into future tenders, even for design services.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline