Atgal į konkursus

Reconstruction of Kabala F3 in Järva County, Türi Rural Municipality, and Leisi F5, Nodapera F7, Papi F2 (all Võhma), and Võlli (Vändra) F4 in Viljandi County, Põhja-Sakala Rural Municipality (IP9160, IP9162, IP9163, IP9161, IP8860)

Uždarytas

Pateikimo terminas pasibaigė

Šio konkurso pateikimo terminas pasibaigė ir paraiškos nebepriimamos. Žemiau pateikta informacija saugoma informaciniais tikslais.

Naršyti aktyvius konkursus
Galutinis terminas
Pasibaigęs
Vasaris 10, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Statyba
Nuoroda
305555
Vertė
€50,948
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Sausis 30, 2026
Organizacija
CPV kodas
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Sausis 30, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Vasaris 03, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Vasaris 10, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Vasaris 10, 2026

Sutarties pradžios data

Vasaris 25, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€50,948
Trukmė
Nenurodyta
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Statyba
65
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€524,963
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
4.7
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
94%
5,932 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Hange on välja kuulutatud Järva maakonnas Türi vallas Kabala külas Kabala(Võhma) F3 ning Viljandi maakonnas, Põhja-Sakala vallas, Arussaare külas Leisi(Võhma) F5, Sürgavere külas Nodapera(Võhma) F7, Arussaare külas Papi(Võhma) F2 ja Võlli külas Võlli(Vändra) F4 rekonstrueerimiseks (IP9160, IP9162, IP9163, IP9161, IP8860) Ehitada vastavalt remondiprojektile. Tööde teostamise tähtaeg on 15.05.2026; Võimalusel ja vajadusel võib lepingu sõlmida ja tööde teostamise/teenuste tellimisega alustada enne hanke kohta üldandmetes avaldatud lepingu kehtivuse eeldatavat algusaega. Hankemenetluse kulgemise pikenemisel üle selle aja võib lepingu sõlmida ja selle täitmisega alustada ka peale üldandmetes avaldatud lepingu kehtivuse eeldatavat algusaega. Tööde teostamise tähtaeg sellest ei muutu.
Finansuojama ESElektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

1 reikalavimų 1 kategorijose

Privalomas (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer must not have mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds, such as criminal background or tax debts.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 5 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

VastavustingimusedPDF
305555_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.7 KB

This document outlines bid submission conditions, requiring bidders to confirm acceptance of base document terms, submit a cost table, and ensure the presence of personnel with specific switching rights and designated responsibility for work operations.

Varasemate hankelepingute informatsioonDOC
Varasemate hankelepingute informatsioon.docx -- 22.3 KB

This document requires bidders to submit information on at least three similar electrical construction contracts completed within the last 60 months, with at least one contract valued at a minimum of 40,000 euros (excl. VAT), and grants permission for inquiries into contract performance.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305555_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation methodology, where the sole criterion is the total tender cost (100% weight), with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
305555_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 7.2 KB

This document details mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds, such as criminal background or tax debts, and sets qualification conditions, requiring bidders to have successfully completed at least three previous procurement contracts within the last 60 months.

Hanke lisatingimused_IP9160_IP9162_IP9163_IP9161_IP8860DOC
Hanke lisatingimused_IP9160_IP9162_IP9163_IP9... -- 18.4 KB

This document outlines additional tender conditions, including mandatory site visits, bid content requirements, coordination with landowners and utility networks, liability for damages, and technical specifications for electrical installations.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

65
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender for electrical infrastructure reconstruction is generally well-structured but contains significant data inconsistencies and potentially restrictive qualification requirements. The lack of explicit sustainability criteria is also a notable concern.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams75/100

The tender appears to comply with national procurement regulations for small procurements, with reasonable deadlines and proper CPV code assignment. Mandatory disclosure requirements are largely met, though the 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed value is a minor inconsistency.

Minor inconsistency regarding 'Value Classified' status.
Aiškumas70/100

The project description and performance conditions are clear. However, there is a direct contradiction between the stated 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria in the characteristics and the 'lowest price' criterion detailed in Document 2, which creates significant ambiguity. The content of critical technical documents (ZIP, XLS) could not be analyzed, impacting a full clarity assessment.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Clarity of technical details in unanalyzed ZIP/XLS documents cannot be fully assessed.
Užbaigtumas65/100

Basic information, deadlines, value, and location are provided. However, three critical documents (base documents, repair projects, cost table) are in unanalyzed formats (ZIP, XLS), preventing a comprehensive assessment of the tender's completeness regarding technical specifications and financial details.

Content of critical technical and financial documents (ZIP, XLS) could not be analyzed.
Sąžiningumas60/100

The tender supports e-procurement and discloses the estimated value. However, the qualification requirement for bidders to have completed at least one similar contract valued at a minimum of 40,000 EUR (excl. VAT) within the last 60 months is quite high relative to the tender's estimated value of 50,948 EUR. This could significantly limit competition and potentially favor larger, more established firms.

Qualification requirement (40,000 EUR contract for a ~51,000 EUR tender) is potentially overly restrictive, limiting competition.
Praktiškumas75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and key dates and financing information are available. The flexibility in contract start date is practical. However, mandatory site visits and the extended payment terms (up to 95 days with factoring) could pose practical challenges for some bidders.

Extended payment terms with factoring (95 days).
Mandatory site visits could be a logistical hurdle.
Duomenų nuoseklumas50/100

While most dates and basic fields are consistent, there is a critical inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria, stating 'relative_weighting' in the general characteristics but 'lowest price' in the specific evaluation document. This direct contradiction is a significant flaw.

Direct contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Tvarumas40/100

Despite being EU funded, the tender lacks explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate modern sustainability principles into the procurement process.

Absence of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of explicit social criteria.

Privalumai

Clear project description and location details.
Detailed and transparent financing conditions.
Support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
Mandatory exclusion grounds clearly stated.

Problemos

Significant contradiction in evaluation criteria.
Potentially overly restrictive qualification requirements.
Inability to analyze critical technical and financial documents (ZIP, XLS).
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Rekomendacijos

1. Immediately clarify and correct the conflicting information regarding evaluation criteria.
2. Review and potentially adjust qualification requirements to ensure broader competition without compromising quality.
3. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in universally accessible and analyzable formats.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“