Atgal į konkursus

TigaSafe Fall Protection System Inspection

Uždarytas

Pateikimo terminas pasibaigė

Šio konkurso pateikimo terminas pasibaigė ir paraiškos nebepriimamos. Žemiau pateikta informacija saugoma informaciniais tikslais.

Naršyti aktyvius konkursus
Galutinis terminas
Pasibaigęs
Vasaris 05, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Paslaugos
Nuoroda
305377
Vertė
€9,000
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Sausis 27, 2026
Organizacija
CPV kodas
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Sausis 27, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Sausis 29, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Vasaris 05, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Vasaris 05, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€9,000
Trukmė
36 mėnesių
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Paslaugos
75
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€71,415
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
4.8
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
99%
2,006 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Hanke esemeks on hoone olemasoleva TigaSafe 456 jm horisontaalse kukkumiskaitsesüsteemi inspekteerimine hanke alusdokumentides toodud mahus ja tingimustel
Elektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

16 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (8)
Privalomas (1)
Atitiktis (1)
Techninis (4)
Finansinis (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Submit the bid according to the general requirements for bid submission and formatting.
--For joint bids, submit a power of attorney.
--Confirm the bid's compliance with the conditions.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Confirm that there are no mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Be registered in the commercial register.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Have successfully completed at least one fall protection system inspection contract within the last 36 months.
--Perform annual inspection of the TigaSafe 456 linear horizontal fall protection system according to the technical task.
--Prepare inspection reports in accordance with standards EN 795:2012 and CEN/TS 16415:2013.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit the total bid price in euros without VAT.
--Provide prices for TigaSafe fall protection system inspection services for the years 2026-2028.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 8 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

VastavustingimusedPDF
305377_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.2 KB

This document outlines general tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint bid power of attorney, confirmation of bid compliance, cost presentation structure, and rules for marking business secrets.

Vorm 1. Pakkumuse maksumuse vormXLS
Vorm 1 Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm.xlsx -- 18.5 KB

Bidders must complete this form, providing prices for TigaSafe fall protection system inspection services for 2026-2028, stating the total cost in euros excluding VAT.

Vorm 2. Lepingute nimekiriDOC
Vorm 2 Lepingute nimekiri.docx -- 26.5 KB

Bidders must submit a list of at least one contract related to fall protection system inspection completed within the last 36 months, using Form 2.

Vorm 3. Vastutavate spetsialistide nimekiriDOC
Vorm 3 Vastutavate spetsialistide nimekiri.do... -- 27.6 KB

This form requires bidders to submit a list of responsible specialists who possess the required qualifications for working at heights and operating machinery in accordance with the Equipment Safety Act.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305377_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document specifies that the tender for TigaSafe fall protection system inspection will be evaluated solely based on the total offer cost (excluding VAT), with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
305377_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 9.2 KB

Bidders must confirm they have no exclusion grounds, are registered in a business register, and have completed at least one fall protection system inspection contract within the last 36 months.

Juhised pakkujatele_Väikehange RHR_14092022PDF
Juhised pakkujatele_Väikehange RHR_14092022.p... -- 458.7 KB

This tenderer instruction document outlines the general terms for conducting a small procurement, requirements for submitting and formatting bids, and the contracting authority's rights regarding negotiations and tender cancellation.

Tehniline ülesanneDOC
Tehniline ülesanne.docx -- 27.9 KB

This document outlines the technical task for the annual inspection of the TigaSafe 456 m horizontal fall protection system, including system description, scope of work, and reporting requirements in accordance with standards EN 795:2012 and CEN/TS 16415:2013.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

75
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender for TigaSafe fall protection system inspection is generally well-structured and clear for a small procurement, with good transparency regarding evaluation criteria and estimated value. However, the unanalyzed contract form and lack of explicit sustainability criteria present minor limitations.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams75/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance for a small procurement. Deadlines are reasonable, CPV codes are appropriate, and there are no detected disputes. The procedure type 'VO' is clarified by an accompanying document, ensuring adherence to national regulations.

The procedure type 'VO' is not immediately self-explanatory in the basic information, requiring reference to other documents for full clarity.
Aiškumas80/100

Clarity is a strong point, with a clear description of the service, well-documented and understandable requirements, and explicitly stated evaluation criteria (lowest price). AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and well-categorized.

Užbaigtumas70/100

The tender provides all essential basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification. Requirements and criteria are well-defined. However, the main contract document ('Töövõtulepingu vorm.zip') was not analyzed, which is a critical component for a full completeness assessment.

The main contract document ('Töövõtulepingu vorm.zip') was not analyzed, preventing a full assessment of its content and completeness.
Sąžiningumas85/100

Fairness is well-addressed with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria based solely on price. E-procurement is enabled. The specific brand name 'TigaSafe' is likely justified for the inspection of an existing system.

Praktiškumas65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. The contract duration is clearly specified, and financing information is referenced to the contract form. The lack of AI analysis for the contract form, however, limits the ability to fully assess practical terms.

The inability to analyze the contract form ('Töövõtulepingu vorm.zip') limits the full assessment of practical terms, financing conditions, and detailed performance conditions.
Duomenų nuoseklumas90/100

All key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent throughout the tender information, indicating high data integrity.

Tvarumas50/100

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This is common for technical service procurements of this nature and value, but it limits the score in this category.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social aspects included.

Privalumai

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Detailed technical task and qualification requirements.
Transparent estimated value and contract duration.
Good data consistency and logical timelines.

Problemos

The main contract document ('Töövõtulepingu vorm.zip') was not analyzed, limiting full assessment.
Procedure type 'VO' could be more explicitly defined in the basic information.
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Specific brand name 'TigaSafe' could potentially limit competition, though likely necessary for existing system inspection.

Rekomendacijos

1. Ensure all critical tender documents, especially the contract form, are provided in an easily analyzable format (e.g., PDF, DOCX).
2. Explicitly define the procurement procedure type (e.g., 'Small Procurement' or 'Väikehange') in the basic information section for immediate clarity.
3. Consider incorporating relevant sustainability or social clauses where applicable, even for technical services, to align with modern procurement best practices.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“