Įgaliotasis inžinierius – Elektros

This tender for Authorised Engineer - Electrical services offers a clear description and good data consistency but lacks crucial details on evaluation criteria and document content, impacting completeness and practicality.

The tender appears to comply with basic regulatory requirements for an open competition below the threshold. The CPV code is appropriate. Deadlines are provided, though their reasonableness is debatable without further context on submission complexity. No disputes are reported, suggesting a clean procedural history.

The description of services required, focusing on independent expert advice for electrical systems and statutory compliance, is clear. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are reasonably well-defined, although specific measurable criteria are missing.

Key information such as estimated value, contract duration, and start date are present. However, the absence of available document content and unspecified evaluation criteria significantly hampers completeness. The mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned but not detailed.

The tender uses an open competition procedure, indicating fairness. The value is disclosed, and criteria are described as objective, though specific details are lacking. Access to full documents is implied but not explicitly confirmed as easily available for all parties. No obvious tailoring to specific companies is apparent.

The tender is active, and a submission deadline is set. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission processes and the unavailability of document content reduce practicality. The contract start date and duration are specified.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated consistently. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the timelines appear logical within the context of the tender publication date.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This category scores lower due to the absence of these common sustainability considerations.