Pašto skyrius – Two Ball Lonnen

This tender for a Post Office branch offers a clear description and reasonable financial estimates, but lacks detailed submission and evaluation criteria, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and a competitive flexible procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the nature of the contract. No disputes are noted. The procedure type is open, which is standard.

The description of the Post Office Main branch and the expected offer is clear. The financial estimates are provided with a range and currency clarification is noted as a potential issue. The link to further information is helpful.

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, and duration. However, specific submission requirements and detailed evaluation criteria are missing, which are crucial for bidders to understand the process fully. The lack of content in the attached documents is a significant drawback.

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed. The criteria for eligibility (successful retailer, ability to incorporate) are objective. The procedure is competitive. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of explicit e-submission details and the absence of content in the tender documents reduce its practicality. The long contract duration (601 months) is unusual and may require further justification or clarification.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical in sequence.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender description. It is also not indicated if the tender is EU funded.