Skip to main content
Retour aux appels d'offres

Services de conseil pour les objets nécessitant une rénovation

Ouvert
Date limite
10 jours restants
Avril 06, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Services
Référence
306815
Valeur
€460,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Mars 05, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Consultancy services for objects requiring renovation100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Mars 05, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 30, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Avril 06, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Avril 06, 2026

Date de début du contrat

Avril 30, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€460,000
Durée
36 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€71,415
Offres moyennes
4.8
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
99%
2,006 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objectif de l'appel d'offres est de conclure un accord-cadre avec un seul fournisseur pour la prestation de services de conseil en ingénierie afin d'évaluer l'état des routes et des chemins et de développer des solutions de restauration et de réparation, conformément aux documents de marché public.
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

15 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (5)
Obligatoire (2)
Conformité (2)
Technique (3)
Financier (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Submit bid cost according to the prescribed form (Lisa 2 Riigihanke pakkumuse maksumuse esildise vorm.xlsx).
--Confirm that the bid meets all tender document conditions (306815_vastavustingimused.pdf).
--The tender is not divided into lots, implying a single contractor is expected.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Compliance with Public Procurement Act (RHS).
--No alternative solutions are allowed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidder must confirm that their bid meets all tender document conditions.
--Bidder must confirm compliance with anti-corruption measures.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Service provider sought for assessing the condition of objects requiring renovation.
--Service provider sought for developing repair solutions for objects requiring renovation.
--Services must comply with current legislation and standards.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidder must submit their bid cost according to the prescribed form.
--Bid cost must include all direct and indirect costs necessary for contract performance.
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

7 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
306815_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.7 KB

Bidders must confirm that their bid complies with all tender document conditions, including anti-corruption measures, and submit the cost according to the specified format.

Lisa 2. Riigihanke pakkumuse maksumuse esildise vormXLS
Lisa 2 Riigihanke pakkumuse maksumuse esildis... -- 18.6 KB

The bidder must submit their tender cost according to the form, including all direct and indirect costs necessary for contract fulfillment.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306815_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306815_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.6 KB

The procurement pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial proof of compliance with the contracting authority's conditions, including explanations and legal references.

Lisa 1. Teenuse tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Teenuse tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 51.9 KB

The contracting authority seeks a service provider to assess the condition of objects requiring repair and develop repair solutions, adhering to applicable legislation and standards.

Lisa 3. Raamlepingu projektDOC
Lisa 3 Raamlepingu projekt.docx -- 51.2 KB

This document is a framework agreement for ordering consultancy services for objects requiring renovation, establishing the contract terms and annexes resulting from the public procurement.

RHADDOC
RHAD.docx -- 53.1 KB

This general part of the tender foundation document outlines the conditions and requirements for an open procurement procedure, including compliance with the Public Procurement Act, submission of clarification requests, and the non-allowance of alternative solutions.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

75
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for consultancy services related to renovation objects is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a single evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document accessibility.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender adheres to standard public procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure type (A) and framework agreement type (WITHOUT_REOPENING_COMPETITION) are clearly stated. No immediate legal compliance issues are apparent, but the absence of explicit dispute information in the provided data limits a full assessment.

Clarté80/100

The tender's objective is clearly described: consultancy services for assessing and developing repair solutions for renovation objects. Requirements are documented through various attached files, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is specified. Conditions are generally clear, although the 'Additional Info' section regarding contract start date flexibility could be more precisely defined.

Exhaustivité70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like the 'Vastavustingimused' and 'Riigihanke pakkumuse maksumuse esildise vorm' are marked as required. However, the 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' is not directly usable by AI, and the 'Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad' document is marked as not required, which is unusual given it's the sole evaluation criterion.

ESPD document format not AI-analyzable
Evaluation criteria document marked as not required
Équité85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. The criteria are objective (lowest price). The requirement for a single contractor is explained as reducing administrative burden, which is a reasonable justification. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies.

Aspect pratique65/100

E-submission is mandated. While document URLs are not explicitly provided for all documents, the opening place is a link to the national e-procurement portal. The contract start date is specified, and financing information is implicitly covered by the estimated value. The duration is clearly stated. However, the AI could not access the content of the ESPD XML file.

AI could not access ESPD XML content
Cohérence des données90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date, Contract Start) are logically ordered.

Durabilité50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This aspect is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Points forts

Clear objective and scope
Single, objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
E-procurement enabled
Reasonable deadlines and value disclosure

Préoccupations

Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
ESPD document format not AI-analyzable
Ambiguity in contract start date flexibility

Recommandations

1. Incorporate explicit sustainability criteria (e.g., green procurement, social aspects).
2. Ensure all tender documents are accessible and analyzable by standard procurement platforms.
3. Clarify the conditions under which the contract start date might deviate from the stated date.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Nouveau service

Vous voulez qu'on s'occupe de cet appel d'offres ?

Nos experts en marchés publics préparent tout. Solution éprouvée — vous relisez, validez et soumettez.

~1hVotre temps uniquement
80%+80%+
$0D'avance
Voir la comparaison complète
Sans TaaSAvec TaaS
40–80 heures
Temps de préparation
~1 heure
Votre temps uniquement
15–25%
Taux de réussite moyen
80%+
Taux de réussite
Risque d'erreurs
Vérification manuelle
QA expert
Contrôle de conformité
Vous faites tout
Gérez tout vous-même
Nous faisons tout
Service clé en main
Gagnons cet appel d'offres !
Payez uniquement en cas de victoire — frais de succès uniquement · Utilisé par plus de 400 entreprises
Ou faites-le vous-même

Ajouter au Pipeline