Retour aux appels d'offres

Équipement TIC pour l'école primaire de Valtu

Fermé

Date limite de soumission dépassée

La date limite de soumission de cet appel d'offres est dépassée et il n'accepte plus de candidatures. Les informations ci-dessous sont conservées à titre de référence.

Parcourir les appels d'offres actifs
Date limite
Expiré
Mars 02, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Fournitures
Référence
306487
Valeur
€8,064
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 18, 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Bid Cost100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 18, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Février 23, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 02, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 02, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€8,064
Durée
Non spécifié
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Fournitures
76
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€104,435
Offres moyennes
2.5
Concurrence
Faible
PME gagnantes
94%
311 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Acquisition d'équipements de technologies de l'information et de la communication pour l'école primaire de Valtu et le centre en développement, dans le cadre de la transformation de l'école primaire de Valtu en un centre d'éducation, de communauté et de prévention des crises.
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

9 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (3)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (3)
Technique (1)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid must be submitted according to the principles of bid submission.
--The cost structure of the bid must comply with the requirements.
--The bidder must fill in the prices for the ICT equipment listed in the bid table "Pakkumustabel - Valtu Põhikool ja kriisikeskus IKT.xlsx".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The bidder must confirm that they are not subject to the exclusion grounds specified in RHS § 95 lõige 1.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must meet the compliance conditions for the bid, including power of attorney requirements for joint bids.
--The bidder must meet equivalence requirements (if applicable).
--The bidder must agree to the terms and conditions of the draft contract, which cover supply, transport, and warranty operations for the delivery of ICT equipment and learning aids to Valtu Basic School.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The bidder must supply ICT equipment (TVs, audio systems, presentation technology) according to the quantities and technical requirements listed in the bid table.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid must include the cost for the digital screen system and small equipment for the crisis center, as the lowest price is the main evaluation criterion.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

5 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
306487_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.8 KB

This document outlines the compliance conditions for the bid, including requirements for joint bid power of attorney, bid submission principles, cost structure, and equivalence requirements, which bidders must address.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306487_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.5 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, primarily focusing on the lowest offer price for both the digital screen system and crisis center small equipment.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306487_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 3.3 KB

This document specifies tenderer exclusion grounds according to § 95 subsection 1 of the Public Procurement Act and requires the tenderer to confirm that they do not have these exclusion grounds.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 43.0 KB

This draft sales contract outlines the terms and conditions between Kehtna Rural Municipality Government and the supplier for the delivery of ICT equipment and educational supplies to Valtu Primary School, including delivery, transport, and warranty services.

PakkumustabelXLS
Pakkumustabel - Valtu Põhikool ja kriisikesku... -- 12.8 KB

This document is an offer table listing the required ICT equipment for Valtu Primary School, such as TVs, sound systems, and presentation technology, along with quantities and technical specifications, where the bidder must fill in the prices.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

76
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender is generally well-structured and compliant for a local procurement of ICT equipment, demonstrating good clarity and fairness, though it lacks explicit contract duration and sustainability considerations.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale85/100

The tender refers to national procurement law (RHS § 95 lõige 1) for exclusion grounds, indicating compliance. The procedure type is defined by code, and CPV codes appear appropriate. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Clarté85/100

The description of the procurement is clear, and requirements are well-documented and categorized. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated in document summaries, despite an automated flag suggesting otherwise.

Exhaustivité70/100

Basic information, financial details, and timeline are provided. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated in the main tender information, which is a notable omission.

Missing explicit contract duration in main tender information.
Équité90/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective and transparent. E-procurement is enabled, ensuring equal access, and requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company.

Aspect pratique65/100

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, the contract start date is not specified, and a direct document URL is not provided (though implied by e-procurement).

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
No direct document URL provided.
Cohérence des données80/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. The primary inconsistency is the automated check flagging 'Missing evaluation criteria' while document summaries clearly state 'lowest offer price' as the main criterion.

Contradiction between automated check and document summary regarding evaluation criteria.
Durabilité20/100

The tender does not include any specific green procurement, social, or innovation aspects. It is also not EU funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.

No green procurement criteria.
No social aspects included.

Points forts

Clear purpose and well-defined technical requirements via offer table.
Transparent and objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Full disclosure of estimated value and use of e-procurement.
Compliance with national legal framework for exclusion grounds.

Préoccupations

Contract duration is not explicitly stated in the main tender information.
Lack of any sustainability (green, social, innovation) considerations.
Absence of an explicit contract start date.
Potential data inconsistency regarding evaluation criteria between automated checks and document summaries.

Recommandations

1. Explicitly state the contract duration and start date in the main tender notice.
2. Consider incorporating basic sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency for ICT equipment).
3. Ensure all evaluation criteria are clearly and consistently presented across all documents and summaries.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline