Retour aux appels d'offres

Achat de trois serveurs pour une solution de journalisation

Fermé

Date limite de soumission dépassée

La date limite de soumission de cet appel d'offres est dépassée et il n'accepte plus de candidatures. Les informations ci-dessous sont conservées à titre de référence.

Parcourir les appels d'offres actifs
Date limite
Expiré
Mars 02, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Fournitures
Référence
306248
Valeur
€45,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 13, 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Total cost of the bid (excluding VAT)100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 13, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Février 23, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 02, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 02, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€45,000
Durée
3 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Fournitures
84
Score de qualité/100
Excellent
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€153,114
Offres moyennes
2.1
Concurrence
Faible
PME gagnantes
91%
374 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objet du contrat de marché public est l'achat de trois serveurs pour une solution de journalisation, conformément aux spécifications techniques fournies dans l'annexe 1.
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

20 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (7)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (4)
Technique (6)
Financier (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--The bid must be valid.
--Authorization to submit the bid must be provided.
--In the case of joint bidders, a power of attorney and confirmation of joint liability must be submitted.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer must not be subject to sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The tenderer must confirm compliance with the tender conditions.
--The bid must offer new equipment.
--The tenderer must submit qualification data in the format specified by the contracting authority (e.g., via ESPD).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Three servers for a log solution must be offered in accordance with the technical description.
--The servers must meet the hardware specifications provided in Annex 1 Technical Description.
--The servers must meet the warranty conditions provided in Annex 1 Technical Description.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The sole evaluation criterion for bids is the total cost of the bid (excluding VAT).
--The bid must include the total cost excluding VAT.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

8 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
306248_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.6 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions, including the absence of sanctions, offer validity, provision of new equipment, and proper authorization for submission.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306248_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.2 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, where the total cost of the offer (excluding VAT) is the sole criterion, accounting for 100% of the score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306248_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.4 KB

This document is an explanatory guide for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the format for the qualification data expected from the economic operator.

Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseksPDF
Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseks.pdf -- 158.2 KB

This document provides instructions for participating in the procurement procedure, detailing basic tender documents, communication protocols, and requirements for proposal formatting and submission.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 227.1 KB

This document details the technical requirements for three servers needed for a log solution, including hardware specifications, warranty conditions, and remote management functionalities, while allowing for equivalent products to be offered with supporting evidence.

Lisa 2 - 3 (vormid)DOC
Lisa 2 - 3 (vormid).docx -- 29.5 KB

This document contains power of attorney forms for authorizing a bidder's representative to submit a tender and for joint bidders, including a confirmation of their joint and several liability.

Lisa 4 Hankelepingu kavandPDF
Lisa 4 Hankelepingu kavand.pdf -- 183.3 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract outlining the terms for purchasing three servers, including the contract object, price, payment conditions, deadlines, and delivery terms.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek - nõuded pakkuj... -- 173.6 KB

This document is an invitation from the University of Tartu to participate in an open procurement procedure for purchasing three servers for a log solution, outlining general terms, qualification requirements, and submission procedures.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

84
Excellent

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for three servers demonstrates high quality in clarity, completeness, and fairness, with well-defined requirements and an objective evaluation process. However, it presents a notable data inconsistency regarding the estimated value classification and lacks any sustainability considerations.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale90/100

The tender exhibits strong legal compliance. The procedure type is clearly defined as an open procedure, the CPV code is appropriate, and there are no detected disputes or suspensions. The explicit inclusion of the 'or equivalent' clause for technical specifications aligns with EU/national procurement regulations, and mandatory disclosure requirements appear to be met.

Clarté95/100

The tender is exceptionally clear. The description of the procurement object is precise, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-categorized and easily understandable. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 100% cost-based, ensuring transparency, and performance conditions are clearly linked to the provided draft contract.

Exhaustivité90/100

The tender is highly complete, providing all essential information including basic details, financial data, timelines, and location. A comprehensive set of documents is attached and processed, and both requirements and evaluation criteria are thoroughly defined. The only minor point is the XML document not being summarized, but its purpose is for machine readability.

Équité95/100

This tender scores very high on fairness. Full document access is provided, the estimated value is disclosed (despite a data inconsistency flag), and the 17-day submission period is reasonable for preparation. The evaluation criteria are objective (lowest price), and the 'or equivalent' clause prevents tailoring to specific companies. E-procurement is fully enabled, ensuring equal access.

Aspect pratique80/100

The tender is practical, supporting electronic submission and clearly specifying the contract duration. While a specific contract start date is not provided, the overall process appears streamlined. Financing information is available through the estimated value.

Cohérence des données60/100

A significant data inconsistency exists where the 'Estimated Value: 45,000.00 EUR' is provided, but 'Value Classified: Yes' is also indicated. This contradiction needs clarification. Otherwise, key fields are populated, and dates are logical.

Contradiction between 'Estimated Value' and 'Value Classified' fields.
Durabilité30/100

The tender lacks any explicit green, social, or innovation procurement criteria. While common for IT hardware, this omission impacts the sustainability score, as no efforts are indicated towards environmental, social, or innovative aspects.

Absence of green procurement criteria.
No inclusion of social aspects.

Points forts

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (100% cost-based).
Comprehensive documentation with explicit 'or equivalent' clauses for technical specifications.
Full support for electronic submission and e-procurement, ensuring accessibility.
Well-structured and understandable requirements across all categories.
Reasonable submission deadline and clear contract duration.

Préoccupations

Contradiction between 'Estimated Value: 45,000.00 EUR' and 'Value Classified: Yes'.
Absence of any explicit green, social, or innovation procurement criteria.
Lack of a specific contract start date.
The ESPD XML document was not summarized, though its purpose is machine readability.

Recommandations

1. Clarify and resolve the inconsistency regarding the estimated value classification to ensure full transparency.
2. Consider integrating sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, extended warranty for repairability) into future IT procurements.
3. Specify an approximate contract start date to provide more clarity for potential bidders.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline