Besoin de l'aide d'un expert en appels d'offres ? Découvrez notre service de préparation d'appels d'offres
Retour aux appels d'offres

Construction of Paide Ambulance Base. Construction Works

Fermé

Date limite de soumission dépassée

La date limite de soumission de cet appel d'offres est dépassée et il n'accepte plus de candidatures. Les informations ci-dessous sont conservées à titre de référence.

Parcourir les appels d'offres actifs
Date limite
Expiré
23 janvier 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
303665
Valeur
€1,100,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
9 décembre 2025
Code CPV
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

9 décembre 2025

Date limite pour les questions

16 janvier 2026

Date limite de soumission

23 janvier 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

23 janvier 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€1,100,000
Durée
8 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Construction
66
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€524,963
Offres moyennes
4.7
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
94%
5,932 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

SA Tartu Kiirabi soovib sõlmida töövõtulepingu ehitustööde teostamiseks Paide kiirabibaasi rajamiseks. Projektdokumentatsioon asub lingil: https://kiirabiee.sharepoint.com/:u:/g/EQ58_Ng49SpDkYm6oANTtM4BhRLV2pwN1OAIsRm6dDN_Eg?e=W1SjyO Hankija juhib tähelepanu asjaolule, et hanketeate avaldamise ja pakkumuste esitamise vaheline periood on 7 nädalat, mille sees on jõulud ja aastavahetus. Eeltoodust tulenevalt on Hankija seisukohal et jõulurahu on tähtis kõigile asjaosalistele ning palume täpsustavate küsimuste esitamisel arvestada perioodiga 22.12.2025-04.01.2026, mil vastuseid Hankija ei edasta. Kiirabibaas rajatakse aadressil: Järva maakond, Paide linn, Kivimurru tn 9 (katastritunnus: 56701:001:1123, katastriüksuse sihtotstarve: ühiskondlike ehitiste maa 100%, pindala: 2428 m²) ja Lai tn 28d (katastritunnus: 56701:001:1125, katastriüksuse sihtotstarve: ühiskondlike ehitiste maa 100%, pindala: 411 m²). Projekti raames ühendatakse nimetatud kaks maaüksust üheks katastriüksuseks.
Soumission électronique

Lancer l'analyse des risques

Identifiez les risques potentiels, les incohérences et les signaux d'alerte dans l'ensemble des documents de l'appel d'offres. Obtenez un rapport de risque détaillé avec les niveaux de gravité et les recommandations d'atténuation.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Obtenez une stratégie gagnante générée par l'IA et adaptée à cet appel d'offres. Comprend un score de probabilité de succès, les opportunités et défis clés, les axes prioritaires de l'offre, une analyse du positionnement concurrentiel et des recommandations concrètes pour maximiser vos chances.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

13 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (4)
Obligatoire (2)
Conformité (3)
Technique (3)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must declare any business secrets.
--Bidders must address subcontractor engagement in their submission.
--Bidders must complete the provided tender offer table, providing unit prices and total sums for all listed cost items.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must declare electronically that they do not fall under the contracting authority's stipulated exclusion grounds as outlined in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--First-tier subcontractors must not have committed criminal offenses such as fraud, money laundering, or human trafficking.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must declare electronically that they meet the contracting authority's stipulated qualification conditions as outlined in the ESPD.
--Bidders must provide information on self-cleaning measures, particularly concerning subcontractors.
--Bidders must accept all procurement terms.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be capable of undertaking the entire construction project for the Paide ambulance base as a single entity, given the tender is not divided into parts.
--Bidders should possess the necessary expertise and experience for construction work related to health buildings (CPV category: Tervishoiuga seotud hoonete ehitustööd).
--Bidders must be able to complete the construction works within an 8-month contract duration.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a mandatory bid guarantee.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

5 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
303665_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document details the conditions for checking subcontractors during the contract performance phase, outlining the grounds for exclusion of first-tier subcontractors, which include criminal offenses such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, and requests information on self-cleaning measures.

VastavustingimusedPDF
303665_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 12.0 KB

This document specifies tender submission requirements, covering business secret declarations, subcontractor engagement, mandatory bid guarantee submission, and acceptance of all procurement terms.

PakkumustabeXLS
pakkumustabel.xlsx -- 84.4 KB

This document is a tender offer table listing cost items, volumes, and units for the construction works of the Paide ambulance base, requiring bidders to provide their unit prices and total sums.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
303665_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The tender for the construction of the Paide ambulance base will be evaluated solely based on the offer price, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
303665_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 74.8 KB

This document is an informative European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the contracting authority's stipulated exclusion grounds and qualification conditions, which bidders must declare electronically.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

66
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for the Paide ambulance base construction is generally well-documented with clear requirements, but suffers from a critical inconsistency regarding its evaluation criteria, which significantly impacts clarity, fairness, and data consistency.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale70/100

The tender generally complies with procurement regulations, utilizing standard documents like ESPD and electronic submission. Deadlines are reasonable. However, the vague 'Type: E (Code: N/A)' and 'Procedure: A (Code: N/A)' are minor issues, and the fundamental contradiction in evaluation criteria poses a significant legal risk regarding the award basis.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria (basic info vs. Document 5)
•Vague procedure type and code ('Type: E (Code: N/A)', 'Procedure: A (Code: N/A)')
Clarté60/100

The project description, location details, and most requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are clear and well-documented. The justification for not dividing the tender is also transparent. However, the critical contradiction between 'relative_weighting' in the basic information and 'evaluated solely based on the offer price' in Document 5 creates significant ambiguity for bidders.

•Contradictory evaluation criteria specified in different sections of the tender documentation
Exhaustivité85/100

The tender is largely complete, providing all essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and detailed location. All necessary documents are listed and accessible, including a link to project documentation. Minor omissions include the explicit contract start date and detailed financing source.

•Contract start date not explicitly stated
•Detailed financing source (beyond estimated value) not provided
Équité70/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and e-procurement. The justification for not dividing the tender is reasonable and not indicative of tailoring. However, the conflicting evaluation criteria present a significant fairness concern, as it can lead to confusion and unequal understanding among bidders regarding the award basis.

•Conflicting evaluation criteria impacting transparency and equal understanding among bidders
Aspect pratique75/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, enhancing accessibility and efficiency. A direct URL for project documentation is provided. The contract duration is clearly specified. Minor improvements could include an explicit contract start date and more detailed financing information.

•Contract start date not explicitly stated
•Detailed financing source (beyond estimated value) not provided
Cohérence des données40/100

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there is a critical inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria. The basic information states 'relative_weighting', while Document 5 explicitly states the tender will be 'evaluated solely based on the offer price'. This fundamental contradiction is a severe data consistency issue.

•Critical inconsistency in evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. 'solely based on offer price')
Durabilité20/100

The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.

•Absence of green procurement criteria
•Lack of social considerations

Points forts

Clear project description and detailed location information
Comprehensive set of tender documents and project documentation link
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled
Reasonable submission period, acknowledging holiday season
Justified decision for not dividing the tender into parts

Préoccupations

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price)
Vague definition of procedure type and code
Absence of sustainability (green, social, innovation) criteria
Contract start date and detailed financing source not explicitly stated

Recommandations

1. Immediately issue a clarification or corrigendum to resolve the contradictory evaluation criteria, specifying whether it is lowest price or relative weighting.
2. Provide explicit definitions for the tender type and procedure code to enhance legal clarity.
3. Integrate sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, waste management, social clauses) into future tenders, especially for construction projects.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes