Organisation et mise en œuvre d'un cours de stylisme d'ongles, de visagisme et de maquillage pour les élèves du complexe scolaire Wincenty Witos à Sucha Beskidzka

This tender for vocational training services is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable CPV code. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure type. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type is 'None', which is unusual and could imply a simplified procedure, but lacks explicit justification.

The tender title and description are clear, specifying the subject of the training and the target audience. The CPV code is appropriate. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their offers will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and CPV code. The submission deadline is provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The value is not disclosed, which can be a concern for fairness. However, there are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, and the criteria for selection are not detailed, which is a drawback.

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. E-procurement is indicated. However, the lack of disclosed financial information and contract duration makes it difficult for potential bidders to assess the project's scope and financial viability. The contract start date is also missing.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.