Organisation complète d'une mission économique externe des PME et de l'administration locale de Lubusk, combinée à une visite au salon PLMA "World of Private Label" 2026 à Amsterdam

This tender for organizing an economic mission is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified CPV code and a clear procedure. However, the absence of a reveal date and specified evaluation criteria could pose minor compliance issues. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context, and no disputes are noted.

The tender title and description are clear, and the purpose of the economic mission is well-defined. Key documents like the bid form and contract draft are provided, contributing to good clarity. However, the lack of explicit eligibility and technical requirements leaves some ambiguity.

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and deadline. The CPV code is provided, and several essential documents are attached. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. Access to documents is provided, and the general nature of the service suggests objective criteria are likely intended. The lack of disclosed value and specific eligibility/technical requirements prevents a higher score.

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. Essential documents like the bid form and contract draft are available. However, the absence of a disclosed contract start date, financing information, and contract duration limits its practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is consistent with the service description. No disputes or suspensions are noted, and the dates provided are logical. The lack of disclosed value does not impact internal consistency.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.