Retour aux appels d'offres

Concours international ouvert de conception du Centre des Congrès de Vilnius

Ouvert
Date limite
13 jours restants
Mars 16, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Autre
Référence
5544883
Valeur
Non divulgué
Lieu
Vilnius County, Lituanie
Publié
Février 23, 2026
Code CPV
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Décembre 01, 2025

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 09, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 16, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 16, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
Non divulgué
Durée
21 mois
Lieu
Vilnius County
Type
Autre
65
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€131,412
Offres moyennes
3.9
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
98%
2,076 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Bâtiment du Centre des Congrès de Vilnius à usage administratif avec voies d'accès, rue A. Goštauto.
Achats écologiques

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

1 exigences dans 1 catégories

Obligatoire (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by applicable public procurement law (e.g., bankruptcy, criminal convictions, unpaid taxes).

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

11 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Atsakymas į tiekėjų paklausimus 01.14DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima 01.14.docx

This document clarifies that foreign specialist qualifications must be recognized in Lithuania by the submission deadline and addresses how professional licenses and project experience are assessed for consortiums, advising to consult relevant Lithuanian authorities for specific document suitability.

Atsakymas į tiekėjų paklausimą 01.20DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima_01.20.docx

This document clarifies that suppliers do not need to submit specialist qualifications at the initial proposal stage for the Vilnius Congress Centre project, as these will be requested from top-ranked participants later.

Atsakymai į tiekėjų paklausimus 01.21DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima_01.21.docx

This document provides official answers to supplier questions regarding the Vilnius Congress Centre project competition, clarifying details like 3D model availability and confirming the submission deadline, with these answers becoming an integral part of the tender documents.

Atsakymai į tiekėjų paklausimus 01.23DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima_01.23.docx

This document clarifies a specific qualification requirement for specialists regarding the preparation of technical or technical working projects for special buildings, referencing Lithuanian construction regulations.

Atsakymai į tiekėjų paklausimus 01.27DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima_01.27.docx

This document provides official answers to supplier questions regarding the Vilnius Congress Centre project competition, clarifying physical model requirements and the scope of the procurement object, and these answers are an integral part of the tender documents, taking precedence over previous provisions.

Atsakymai į tiekėjų paklausimus 01.30DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima_01.30.docx

This document provides official answers to supplier questions regarding the Vilniaus Congress Centre project, clarifying preliminary building scheme adjustments and servitude requirements, with these clarifications taking precedence over previous tender documents.

Atsakymai į tiekėjų paklausimus 02.05DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima_02.05.docx

This document provides official answers to supplier questions regarding qualification requirements for the Vilnius Congress Centre architectural project competition, clarifying team structure, specialist listing, and EU professional qualification recognition.

Atsakymai į tiekėjų paklausimus 02.12DOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima_02.12.docx

This document provides official answers to supplier questions regarding the recognition of international (specifically UK) architectural qualifications in Lithuania, clarifying the procedures and requirements for architects to practice in the country for this tender.

Atsakymas 5 klausimąDOC
2. Dėl_atsakymo_i_klausima.docx

This document clarifies that administrative buildings are considered public purpose buildings under STR 2.02.02:2004, confirming the qualification requirement for specialists to have experience with public purpose buildings is correct for the Vilnius Congress Centre project.

2. Responses_to_suppliers_questionsDOC
2. Responses_to_suppliers_questions.docx

This document provides official responses to suppliers' questions, clarifying that experience in public-use buildings is required for specialists, as administrative buildings are classified as public-use under relevant regulations, and these clarifications are an integral part of the procurement documents.

NoticePDF
Notice_5544883.pdf

This document is a contract notice for an open international project competition to design and develop the Vilnius Congress Centre building, including architectural proposals, BIM creation, technical project preparation, and supervision services.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

65
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender is generally well-structured and includes extensive clarifications, but it has critical deficiencies regarding evaluation criteria and sustainability.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type (Open, EU Directive 2014/24/ES) and uses appropriate CPV codes. Mandatory exclusion grounds are specified. The numerous Q&A documents demonstrate an active effort to clarify legal and qualification aspects. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the reveal date is missing.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing reveal date
Clarté60/100

The project description is clear, and the scope is further detailed in the contract notice. The extensive Q&A process has addressed many potential ambiguities. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged.

No evaluation criteria specified
Exhaustivité65/100

Basic information (title, reference, organization, deadlines, duration, location) is largely present. The availability of 11 detailed documents, including Q&As, significantly enhances the completeness of the information. However, the tender lacks an estimated value and, most importantly, does not specify the evaluation criteria, which are fundamental components of a complete tender package.

Missing estimated value
Missing evaluation criteria
Équité55/100

The tender benefits from full document access and e-procurement, promoting equal access. The clarification that specialist qualifications are not required at the initial proposal stage is a positive step for fairness. However, the undisclosed estimated value reduces transparency. The most significant fairness concern is the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, which undermines objectivity and transparency in the selection process.

No evaluation criteria specified
Estimated value not disclosed
Aspect pratique70/100

The tender supports e-procurement, which implies electronic submission and streamlines the process. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date is not provided, and financing information (estimated value) is missing, which can make financial planning difficult for potential bidders.

Contract start date not known
Financing information (estimated value) not available
Cohérence des données90/100

The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates for submission and opening, and consistent duration specifications. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Most key fields are populated. The main gaps are the missing estimated value, liable person, and reveal date, which are minor inconsistencies rather than contradictions.

Estimated value not disclosed
Liable person not specified
Durabilité20/100

The tender documentation, based on the provided summaries and automated checks, does not include any explicit requirements or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. For a significant architectural project like a Congress Centre, this represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the design and construction.

No green procurement
No social criteria

Points forts

Clear project description and scope
Extensive Q&A process addressing bidder queries and clarifying requirements
E-procurement enabled, promoting accessibility
Clear procedure type and appropriate CPV codes
No disputes or suspensions, indicating a stable process

Préoccupations

Critical: Absence of specified evaluation criteria, severely impacting clarity and fairness
Estimated value not disclosed, reducing transparency
Lack of any explicit sustainability (green, social, innovation) requirements
Missing contract start date and reveal date

Recommandations

1. Immediately publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Disclose the estimated value or budget for the design services to aid bidder planning.
3. Integrate sustainability requirements (e.g., energy efficiency, material sourcing, social impact, innovative design solutions) into the tender documents.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline