712352453-PA23 - DM/00179 - Remplacement du système de sécurité et de surveillance aux sites DM Beith et DM Gosport-UK4

This tender for a Safety and Monitoring System replacement is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a disclosed budget. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission, impacting overall accessibility and fairness.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure type is specified. However, the absence of a reveal date and the potential for a short submission deadline (though not explicitly flagged as too short by the system) are minor concerns.

The description of the required Safety & Monitoring System is detailed and comprehensive, outlining specific functionalities and through-life responsibilities. The AI-extracted technical requirements are also clearly listed, providing a good understanding of the Authority's needs.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of available document content and the absence of specific submission requirements mean that crucial details for potential bidders are missing.

The tender discloses the estimated value and uses objective technical requirements. The procedure is competitive. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed, potentially impacting fairness. The absence of explicit e-submission details also raises questions about accessibility.

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of explicit e-submission information and the absence of any mention of financing details or document URLs reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract dates are populated consistently. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.