Reconstruction de la voie interne sur la parcelle n° 235 dans la zone de Piątki, commune de Nidzica

This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-structured with a clear description and ample documentation. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear CPV code, organization details, and a submission deadline. The procedure is not specified, which is a minor omission. No disputes are indicated. The deadline appears reasonable given the scope.

The description of the road reconstruction is clear, detailing the type of pavement and dimensions. The attached documents, though not fully summarized, suggest detailed technical specifications are available. However, evaluation criteria are missing, which hinders clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadline. The estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not specified, which are significant omissions. A substantial number of documents are attached, indicating a good level of detail.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The value is not disclosed, which is a concern for transparency. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could lead to subjective assessments. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the contract start date is not specified, and the financing information is absent. The lack of explicit e-submission instructions, despite being an e-procurement process, is a minor point. The duration of the contract is also missing.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical. The lack of a reveal date is a minor inconsistency.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender notice. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.