Sous-traitants et Entrepreneurs Spécialisés pour les Services de Bâtiment

This tender for building services subcontractors is generally well-structured, with clear eligibility and technical requirements. However, it lacks specific financial details and evaluation criteria, and the submission process could be more streamlined.

The tender adheres to open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of services required is clear, outlining the need for multi-trade contractors for maintenance, routine servicing, and emergency repairs. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are documented. However, evaluation criteria are missing, which impacts overall clarity.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and deadline is present. The CPV code is provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and there is no content available for the attached tender documents, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

The tender is open to all qualified contractors and divided into lots, allowing for broad participation. The ranked basis for lot allocation is a transparent mechanism. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting fairness. E-procurement is indicated.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of explicit information on contract start date, financing, and duration limits the practicality for potential bidders. The absence of direct document URLs for content also reduces ease of access.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical. The CPV code and NUTS code are present, contributing to good data consistency.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided tender details. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.