CBC-1950-T-SK Remplacement de cuisine et de salle de bain

This tender for kitchen and bathroom replacements is generally well-structured with clear submission instructions and a defined value. However, it lacks specific technical and financial requirements, and details on evaluation criteria are missing.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the provision of a CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are stated, though the submission deadline might be considered tight by some. No disputes are reported. The procedure is described as 'competitive flexible procedure'.

The description of the service required (Kitchen and Bathrooms Installation and Replacement) is clear. The process for submitting questions and documents is well-documented, emphasizing the use of the In-tend system. However, specific technical and financial requirements are not detailed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are present. The CPV code is provided. However, crucial details regarding technical capabilities, financial standing, and evaluation criteria are missing, impacting overall completeness.

The tender promotes fairness by making questions and responses available to all tenderers and emphasizing a consistent approach. The use of an e-procurement system (In-tend) is a positive aspect. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is open. No specific company tailoring is evident.

The tender mandates e-submission via the In-tend system, which is practical. A contract start date and duration are specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the absence of specific technical and financial requirements might pose a challenge for some potential bidders in preparing their submissions.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, and duration are populated. The dates provided are logical and do not indicate any inconsistencies. No suspension or disputes are reported.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.