Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Tartu kaupungin oppilaitosten kunnossapitopalveluiden osto 1.8.2026-31.7.2030

Avoin
Määräaika
11 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 27, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Palvelut
Viite
306745
Arvo
€1,500,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 26, 2026
Organisaatio
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Total cost of maintenance service100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 26, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 20, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 27, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 27, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€1,500,000
Kesto
Ei määritelty
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Palvelut
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€229,828
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.0
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
68%
135 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Osa I: Koulujen kunnossapitopalveluiden ostaminen. Osa II: Päiväkotien kunnossapitopalveluiden ostaminen.
Sähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

60%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender is heavily weighted towards price, making cost leadership the primary driver of success. Bidders must demonstrate robust cost control and efficiency in their maintenance operations to secure the highest score. While social value and innovation are not explicitly requested, demonstrating operational excellence and reliability will be key differentiators against price-focused competitors.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Uncompromising Value: Delivering reliable and efficient maintenance services at the most competitive price.

Operational Excellence: Proven expertise in educational facility management, ensuring seamless operations and rapid emergency response.

Trusted Partner: A commitment to transparency and compliance, ensuring a secure and dependable service.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Aggressive pricing strategy due to 100% cost weighting.
Focus on operational efficiency to drive down costs and improve margins.
Leveraging existing infrastructure and economies of scale to offer a lower price.
Clear technical requirements allow for precise cost estimation and service delivery planning.
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all cost-saving opportunities, and develop a lean operational model. Consider strategic partnerships or shared resources if feasible to reduce overheads.

Potential for low margins if pricing is too aggressive.

Ensure realistic cost estimations and build in a small, acceptable profit margin. Focus on long-term contract value and potential for future extensions or additional services.

Ensuring strict adherence to exclusion grounds regarding Russian Federation connections.

Implement a robust due diligence process for all subcontractors and suppliers. Obtain written declarations from all parties confirming no ties to the Russian Federation.

The absence of explicit social value or innovation requirements means differentiation must come from core service delivery and cost.

Focus on demonstrating superior operational efficiency, reliability, and responsiveness, which indirectly contribute to the well-being of the educational institutions and their users.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A highly efficient and cost-conscious facilities management company with a proven track record in public sector contracts, specifically educational institutions. The ideal bidder possesses strong operational capabilities for routine maintenance and emergency response, coupled with a lean cost structure that allows for aggressive pricing.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Demonstrate ability to provide maintenance works and emergency dispatch services for schools and kindergartens.
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds, particularly regarding subcontractors/suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
Accurate and competitive pricing for the total cost of the maintenance service.
Monitoring meter readings and maintenance of water softening systems for kindergartens.
Declaration of business secrets.
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrated ability to achieve superior cost efficiencies through optimized processes and technology.
Exceptional track record in managing similar public sector educational facilities, highlighting reliability and minimal disruption.
Proactive approach to maintenance, minimizing emergency call-outs and associated costs.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to local employment within Tartu, highlighting community benefit and economic contribution.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Total cost of maintenance service100.0%

Develop a highly competitive pricing model by meticulously analyzing all cost components, optimizing resource allocation, and leveraging economies of scale. Aim to be the lowest bidder while ensuring profitability through operational efficiency and lean management.

Suositukset6
Aggressive Cost Leadership Strategy
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the 100% weighting on cost, the primary strategy must be to submit the lowest possible price that is still sustainable. This requires a deep dive into all operational costs, identifying areas for efficiency gains, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin for this contract.

Maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Rigorous Due Diligence for Exclusion Grounds
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Implement a stringent vetting process for all subcontractors and suppliers to ensure no connections to the Russian Federation. This is a mandatory exclusion ground and failure to comply will lead to disqualification.

Ensures compliance and avoids disqualification.
Highlight Operational Efficiency and Reliability
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

While price is paramount, subtly emphasize the bidder's proven ability to deliver efficient and reliable maintenance services. This can be done through concise case studies or statements of capability, demonstrating that low cost does not compromise quality or responsiveness.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver despite a low price, potentially influencing perception.
Detailed Cost Breakdown and Justification
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Prepare a detailed and transparent cost breakdown that supports the submitted price. This demonstrates a thorough understanding of the service requirements and the rationale behind the pricing, even if not explicitly requested for submission.

Provides internal confidence and can be used to justify pricing if questioned.
Scenario Planning for Cost Fluctuations
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Develop contingency plans for potential cost increases (e.g., materials, labor) during the contract period. While the contract duration is not specified, understanding potential risks to the low-cost model is crucial.

Protects profitability and service delivery in the face of unforeseen circumstances.
Local Employment Commitment (Optional)
MatalaMatala vaiva

If feasible and does not significantly impact cost, consider a statement of commitment to utilizing local labor within Tartu. This can be a subtle positive differentiator.

Minor positive perception enhancement.
Kilpailuasema
Position as the most cost-effective provider without sacrificing essential service quality. Emphasize efficiency and streamlined operations as the drivers of low cost, rather than cutting corners.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

7 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (2)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (1)
Tekninen (2)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Tender documents include contract drafts and technical specifications for both schools and kindergartens.
--ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) in .xml format is mentioned but not directly analyzable.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must declare their business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The service includes maintenance works and emergency dispatch services for educational institutions (schools and kindergartens).
--Specific technical requirements include monitoring meter readings and maintenance of water softening systems for kindergartens.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bids will be evaluated based on the total cost of the maintenance service, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

7 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

VastavustingimusedPDF
306745_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 14.2 KB

Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation and declare any business secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306745_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 8.0 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on the total cost of the maintenance service, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306745_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 79.4 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the entrepreneur, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and expected response formats, but is not intended for completion.

Tehniline kirjeldus II OSA (Lasteaiad)DOC
Tehniline kirjeldus II OSA (Lasteaiad) .docx -- 66.0 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements for the maintenance services of Tartu city kindergartens, including emergency dispatch services, meter reading monitoring, and water softening system maintenance.

Tehniline kirjeldus I OSA (Koolid)DOC
Tehniline kirjeldus I OSA (Koolid).docx -- 68.7 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements for the maintenance services of Tartu city's educational institutions, including maintenance works and emergency dispatch services, necessary for bid submission.

Töövõtulepingu projekt II OSA (Lasteaiad)DOC
Töövõtulepingu projekt II OSA (Lasteaiad).doc... -- 46.0 KB

This document is a draft of the service contract outlining the terms and legal framework for the procurement of maintenance services for Tartu city kindergartens.

Töövõtulepingu projekt I OSA ( Koolid)DOC
Töövõtulepingu projekt I OSA ( Koolid).docx -- 56.7 KB

This draft contract outlines the terms and scope of the maintenance services for Tartu's educational institutions, which is necessary for bid submission.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for maintenance services for Tartu's educational institutions is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria beyond price and has limited sustainability considerations.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The exclusion of bidders connected to the Russian Federation is a specific regulatory requirement.

Selkeys80/100

The description of services for schools and kindergartens is clear, and technical specifications are provided. The conditions for contract commencement are also clearly outlined, addressing potential delays.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, deadlines, and duration. Contract drafts and technical specifications for both parts are attached. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated as a fixed term, only the start date and a flexible end date based on commencement.

Contract duration not explicitly stated as a fixed term.
Reiluus85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. The criteria for evaluation are objective (lowest price), and e-procurement is utilized. The exclusion of Russian-linked entities is a geopolitical requirement, not company-specific tailoring.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a clear opening place is provided. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the contract start date is conditional on the procurement process, which can introduce some uncertainty.

Financing information not explicitly detailed.
Contract start date is conditional.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender process.

Kestävyys50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded, limiting its sustainability score.

No green procurement criteria.
No social criteria.

Vahvuudet

Clear technical specifications for both parts.
Mandatory exclusion grounds are clearly stated.
E-procurement and e-submission are utilized.
Reasonable submission deadline.

Huolenaiheet

Missing explicit evaluation criteria beyond price.
Contract duration not clearly defined as a fixed term.
Limited sustainability considerations.

Suositukset

1. Specify evaluation criteria beyond price to encourage quality.
2. Clearly define the contract duration as a fixed term.
3. Incorporate sustainability or social criteria into the evaluation.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin