Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Narva-Jõesuun Liivan kadun – Supelrand R2 -yhdystien osuuden suunnittelu- ja rakennustyöt

Avoin
Määräaika
6 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 21, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
306228
Arvo
€112,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 27, 2026
CPV-koodi
Arviointikriteerit
Bid price100%
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 27, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 14, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 21, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 21, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€112,000
Kesto
5 kuukautta
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€524,963
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.7
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
94%
5,932 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Hankkeen laajuus sisältää Liivan kadun osuuden suunnittelun ja rakentamisen aina Supelrand R2 kiinteistöllä sijaitsevan laiturirakennusprojektin yhteydessä rakennetun yhdystien alkuun asti. Yhdystielle asennetaan pienrakenteita (roskakorit, penkit, infotaulut) asemapiirroksen mukaisesti, ja yhdystielle suunnitellaan ja rakennetaan valaistus. Hankkeen laajuus sisältää tie-rakennustyön suunnittelun/työpiirustusten laatimisen sekä katuvalaistuksen suunnittelun/työpiirustusten laatimisen tilaajan toimittamien pääpiirustusten perusteella.
EU-rahoitteinenSähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

75%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender focuses on a straightforward design and build project for an access road. The primary evaluation criterion is cost, making a highly competitive price essential. Bidders must meticulously adhere to all mandatory and eligibility requirements, particularly concerning subcontractor confirmations and the correct submission of all required forms.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Cost-Effective and Compliant Solution for Narva-Jõesuu Access Road

Reliable Design and Construction with Guaranteed Quality

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Dominant role of cost in evaluation.
Opportunity to leverage existing relationships or local knowledge for efficient execution.
Clear technical requirements allow for focused design and build planning.
Keskeiset haasteet
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify areas for efficiency and optimization without compromising quality. Explore material sourcing and construction methods that offer cost savings. Consider a lean project management approach.

Strict adherence to all mandatory forms and eligibility criteria.

Implement a rigorous document review process, assigning dedicated personnel to ensure all forms are correctly completed, signed, and submitted. Double-check all references to required documents (Vorm 1, Vorm 2, Vorm 3, Vorm 4).

Potential for disqualification due to minor errors in submission.

Utilize a checklist based on the tender documents and submission requirements. Conduct internal pre-submission reviews by experienced procurement professionals.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
An experienced civil engineering and construction firm with a proven track record in road construction and public procurement in Estonia. The ideal bidder will have robust cost control mechanisms, efficient project management capabilities, and a strong understanding of Estonian procurement regulations. Familiarity with Narva-Jõesuu's local context is a plus.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Detailed cost table (Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx)
Power of attorney (Vorm 1 Volikiri.docx) or joint bidder power of attorney (Vorm 2 Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx)
Consent document from third-party resources if used (Vorm 3 Teise isiku nõusolek.docx)
Subcontractor confirmations (Vorm 4 Alltöövõtja kinnitused.docx) and background check compliance
Compliance with technical specifications (Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus_N-J muuli tee.docx)
Confirmation of compliance with conditions (306228_vastavustingimused.pdf)
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
A demonstrably lowest compliant bid.
A highly detailed and transparent cost breakdown that instills confidence in the bidder's understanding of the project's financial scope.
Proactive identification and mitigation of potential risks within the technical specification, presented clearly in the bid.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly required, consider a statement on commitment to local employment or responsible waste management during construction. This can be a subtle differentiator if competitors ignore it.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Cost of the bid100%

Develop a highly competitive and detailed cost proposal. Ensure all direct and indirect costs are accurately captured in Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx. Identify opportunities for cost efficiencies in design and construction methods.

Technical Capability

Demonstrate a clear understanding of the technical requirements outlined in Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus_N-J muuli tee.docx. Ensure the proposed design and construction methods align with the quality standards and principles of equivalence specified.

Eligibility and Exclusion Grounds

Meticulously complete all required forms (Vorm 1, Vorm 2, Vorm 3, Vorm 4) and provide necessary confirmations. Ensure all subcontractors meet the exclusion criteria and provide their confirmations.

Suositukset6
Master the Cost Table
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Dedicate significant effort to accurately populate Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx. Break down costs granularly for design and construction, including general and specific works. Ensure no line items are missed and that the pricing reflects competitive market rates while ensuring profitability.

Directly impacts the primary evaluation criterion, crucial for winning.
Flawless Form Submission
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Create a checklist for all mandatory forms (Vorm 1, Vorm 2, Vorm 3, Vorm 4) and supporting documents. Assign a dedicated person to review and verify each submission before the deadline. Pay close attention to signatures, dates, and correct authorization.

Prevents immediate disqualification due to administrative errors.
Cost Optimization Strategy
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Beyond just low pricing, demonstrate value. This could involve proposing efficient construction methods or material choices that reduce long-term maintenance, even if not explicitly asked for. Highlight how your cost structure ensures quality.

Enhances perceived value and competitiveness.
Proactive Risk Identification
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

While not a formal evaluation criterion, subtly highlight any potential risks identified in the technical specification (e.g., ground conditions, access) and how your design/construction plan mitigates them. This shows foresight and competence.

Builds confidence in the bidder's project management capabilities.
Subcontractor Due Diligence
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Thoroughly vet all proposed subcontractors. Ensure they can provide the required confirmations (Vorm 4) and pass the contracting authority's background checks for fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing. Have backup subcontractors identified.

Ensures compliance and avoids disqualification due to subcontractor issues.
Optional Sustainability Statement
MatalaMatala vaiva

Include a brief, optional statement in the bid about commitment to sustainable construction practices (e.g., waste reduction, local material sourcing) if it can be achieved without increasing costs. This can be a subtle positive differentiator.

Minor positive impression, potential differentiator if competitors are purely cost-focused.
Kilpailuasema
Position as the most cost-effective yet fully compliant bidder. Emphasize efficiency and adherence to all requirements to counter any perception of 'too cheap to be true'.
Highlight a streamlined project delivery process that ensures timely completion within the 5-month duration.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

15 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (5)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (5)
Tekninen (2)
Taloudellinen (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must confirm compliance with the conditions and submit the bid cost in the prescribed form (306228_vastavustingimused.pdf).
--The tender is not divided into lots because the construction works are technically interconnected to such an extent that dividing them into lots would be unreasonable both technically and organizationally and might not ensure the same quality result.
--The tender documents required for submitting a bid are contained in Hanke alusdokument - juurdepääsutee.docx.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority shall exclude a candidate if it has established that the candidate has been convicted of fraud, corruption, money laundering or terrorist financing.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must provide a power of attorney (Vorm 1 Volikiri.docx) authorizing a natural person to represent the bidder in the public procurement procedure and in the conclusion of the contract.
--If using third-party resources for qualification, a consent document from the third party is required (Vorm 3 Teise isiku nõusolek.docx), confirming joint responsibility for contract fulfillment.
--For joint bidders, a power of attorney (Vorm 2 Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx) must be submitted, authorizing one bidder to represent the others.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is for the design and construction works of the access road to Liiva tn – Supelrand R2 in Narva-Jõesuu. The scope includes technical requirements, quality of materials and works, and principles of equivalence as defined in Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus_N-J muuli tee.docx.
--The contracting authority will check the background of subcontractors regarding fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and evidence (306228_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused.pdf).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The sole evaluation method is the cost of the bid, with a 100% weighting (306228_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf).
--Bidders must submit a detailed cost table describing the costs of design and construction works, including general and specific construction works (Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx).

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

12 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306228_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.8 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306228_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 12.2 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to define business secrets, submit a power of attorney for joint bidders (if applicable), confirm compliance with conditions, and present the bid price in the prescribed format.

Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel_Lisa 2XLS
Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx -- 15.1 KB

Bidders must submit a detailed cost table outlining the expenses for design and construction works, including general and specific construction activities.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306228_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, where the bid price is the sole evaluation method with a 100% weighting.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306228_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 71.9 KB

The procurement pass is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence of meeting the contracting authority's qualification requirements, and is not intended for completion.

Hanke alusdokumentDOC
Hanke alusdokument - juurdepääsutee.docx -- 3.4 MB

This document contains the tender base documents for the design and construction works of the Liiva street – Supelrand R2 access road section in Narva-Jõesuu, which are necessary for submitting a bid.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus_N-J muuli tee.docx -- 202.4 KB

This technical specification defines the technical requirements, material and work quality, and equivalence principles for the design and construction works of the Narva-Jõesuu town Liiva street – Supelrand R2 access road.

Lisa 3. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 3 Lepingu eelnõu.docx -- 3.0 MB

This document is a draft of the works contract, outlining the terms and obligations for the design and construction works of the Liiva street – Supelrand R2 access road in Narva-Jõesuu.

Vorm 1. VolikiriDOC
Vorm 1 Volikiri.docx -- 3.1 MB

This power of attorney authorizes a physical person to represent the bidder in the public procurement procedure and contract signing.

Vorm 2. Ühispakkujate volikriDOC
Vorm 2 Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 3.6 MB

This document is a joint bidder's power of attorney, authorizing one bidder to represent other participants in a joint bid.

Vorm 3. Teise isiku nõusolekDOC
Vorm 3 Teise isiku nõusolek.docx -- 3.1 MB

This document is a third-party consent form confirming that the bidder can utilize resources from another entity to prove their qualifications and that they will be jointly responsible for contract fulfillment.

Vorm 4. Alltöövõtja kinnitused.DOC
Vorm 4 Alltöövõtja kinnitused.docx -- 9.4 KB

The subcontractor's confirmation that there are no grounds for exclusion from the procurement procedure is required to be submitted with the bid.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for design and construction works of an access road is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document access.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV codes and a clear process. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the structure.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented through various attached forms and specifications. Evaluation criteria are specified, and conditions for submission are outlined.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and while many documents are attached, the overall completeness could be improved by explicitly stating the contract start date.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Reiluus85/100

The tender allows full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective (price-based), and e-procurement is utilized. Deadlines are reasonable. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

E-submission is mandated. While document URLs are not explicitly listed for all, the primary tender documents are accessible. The contract duration is specified, but the contract start date is missing, impacting full practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

Contract start date missing.
Financing information not detailed.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequenced.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is EU funded, which is a positive characteristic, but specific sustainability goals are absent.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Vahvuudet

Clear description of works and requirements.
Objective evaluation criteria (price-based).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
EU funded.

Huolenaiheet

Missing contract start date.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.
Limited detail on financing.

Suositukset

1. Specify the contract start date.
2. Incorporate explicit sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility).
3. Provide more detailed financing information if possible.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin