Tarvitsetko tarjousasiantuntijan apua? Katso tarjousten valmistelupalvelumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Reconstruction of Sinimäe Boiler House

Suljettu

Jättömääräaika on umpeutunut

Tämän tarjouskilpailun jättömääräaika on umpeutunut, eikä se enää ota vastaan hakemuksia. Alla olevat tiedot säilytetään viitteellisinä.

Selaa aktiivisia tarjouskilpailuja
Määräaika
Päättynyt
30. tammikuuta 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
304803
Arvo
€394,000
Sijainti
Estonia, Viro
Julkaistu
15. tammikuuta 2026
Organisaatio
CPV-koodi
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

15. tammikuuta 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

23. tammikuuta 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

30. tammikuuta 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

30. tammikuuta 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€394,000
Kesto
Ei määritelty
Sijainti
Estonia
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
71
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€524,963
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.7
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
94%
5,932 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Katlamaja ja selle juurde kuuluva hakkelao ehitusprojekti koostamine, ehitustööde teostamine, katlamaja ja pelletilao seadmete tarnimine ja paigaldamine, katlamaja automaatjuhtimise süsteemi väljaehitamine.
EU-rahoitteinenSähköinen jättö

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Hanki tekoälyllä luotu voittostrategia, joka on räätälöity tähän tarjouskilpailuun. Sisältää voiton todennäköisyyspisteet, keskeiset mahdollisuudet ja haasteet, suositellut tarjouksen painopistealueet, kilpailuasemanäkemykset ja toimintasuositukset mahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

Kirjaudu sisään

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

26 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (8)
Pakollinen (3)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (6)
Tekninen (7)
Taloudellinen (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Submit a written confirmation of the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds (e.g., bankruptcy, liquidation, tax debt).
--Submit proof of no tax debt, if applicable.
--Complete and submit the form confirming legal status, agreement with tender conditions, fulfillment of qualification criteria, and offer validity.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS3
--Bidder must not be in bankruptcy.
--Bidder must not be in liquidation.
--Bidder must not have tax debt.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Confirm legal status.
--Confirm agreement with all tender conditions.
--Fulfill all qualification criteria.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Design and construct a fully automated, bio-fuel-fired boiler house.
--Adhere to the specified location, existing utilities, and technical parameters for the boiler house reconstruction project.
--Ensure the proposed design and construction comply with the Piping and Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID) for the new biofuel boiler and reserve boiler.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit a total cost offer for the project.
--Provide detailed unit and total costs for design, demolition, construction, equipment, and installation works for the reconstruction of the Sinimäe boiler house.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

14 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

VastavustingimusedPDF
304803_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.8 KB

This document outlines the tender submission requirements, including the list of offered equipment, a detailed cost table, a construction schedule, and a power of attorney for joint bidders.

Pakutavate seadmete nimekiriXLS
Lisa 5 Pakutavate seadmete nimekiri Sinimäe K... -- 10.6 KB

To submit a bid, companies must complete this form, listing the brand, parameters, and quantity of proposed equipment (e.g., boiler, multicyclone, smoke extractor) for the Sinimäe boiler house reconstruction.

Maksumuse tabelXLS
Lisa 6 maksumuse vorm Sinimäe KM.xlsx -- 11.2 KB

This document is a cost form that must be completed when submitting a bid, detailing the unit and total costs for design, demolition, construction, equipment, and installation works for the reconstruction of the Sinimäe boiler house.

EhitusgraafikXLS
Tööde teostamise graafik Sinimäe KM.xlsx -- 10.4 KB

This document is a template for submitting the construction schedule for the Sinimäe boiler house reconstruction, outlining the project timeline by month.

Vorm IDOC
Vorm I – Pakkuja kirjalik kinnitus hankemenet... -- 15.7 KB

This form requires bidders to confirm their legal status, agreement with tender conditions, fulfillment of qualification criteria, and offer validity.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304803_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

Tender offers will be evaluated 100% based on the total cost of the offer, with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum points.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
304803_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 4.5 KB

This document outlines bidder exclusion grounds (e.g., bankruptcy, liquidation, tax debt) and requires bidders to submit a written confirmation of their absence, along with proof of no tax debt if applicable.

Kinnituskiri projekteerimistingimuste vajaduse puudumise kohtaDOC
Fw_ Projekteerimistingimuste taotlusel oleva ... -- 83.5 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

HDDOC
Hankedokument_Sinimäe katlamaja.docx -- 22.6 KB

These tender documents (HD) provide general instructions and conditions for the Sinimäe boiler house reconstruction tender, specifying the contracting authority, deadlines, contacts, and bid submission requirements.

Hanke tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus Sinimäe KM.pdf -- 226.4 KB

This document outlines the objective of the Sinimäe boiler house reconstruction project, which involves designing and constructing a fully automated, bio-fuel-fired boiler house, specifying its location, existing utilities, and technical parameters.

Torustiku skeemPDF
Lisa 2 - KM PID skeem.pdf -- 357.4 KB

This document is a piping and instrumentation diagram (P&ID) for the Sinimäe boiler house reconstruction, detailing the piping, valves, sensors, and other components for the new biofuel boiler and reserve boiler, complete with a legend and notes.

AsendiplaanPDF
Lisa 3 - KM asendiplaan.pdf -- 597.2 KB

This document is the site plan for the Sinimäe boiler house reconstruction, detailing the gas measuring node, asphalted areas, fire hydrant location, new and existing chimneys, pellet loading and storage areas, and the heating main connection point.

Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Töövõtuleping (katlamaja projekteerimine ja e... -- 129.5 KB

This document is the draft contract agreement for the design and construction of the Sinimäe boiler house, outlining the terms and obligations of the future contract.

Ühispakkujate volikiri_Vorm IVDOC
Vorm IV - Ühispakkujate volikiri Sinimäe KM.d... -- 14.9 KB

This document is a power of attorney for joint bidders, allowing multiple companies to authorize one of them to act on their behalf in the procurement procedure.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

71
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for the reconstruction of the Sinimäe boiler house is generally well-documented with clear technical requirements and promotes fairness. However, it suffers from a critical inconsistency regarding evaluation criteria and lacks explicit details on contract duration and additional sustainability aspects beyond the project's inherent green nature.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender generally appears compliant with public procurement principles, including reasonable deadlines and the 'or equivalent' clause. The CPV code is appropriate. However, the non-standard procedure/type codes and the private organization issuing an EU-funded 'government tender' introduce minor ambiguities regarding the specific regulatory framework.

•Non-standard procedure/type codes (Type: E, Procedure: MS with N/A codes)
•Private organization (SW ENERGIA OÜ) issuing an EU-funded 'government tender' might imply a sub-procurement or specific national context not fully clear.
Selkeys70/100

The project description, technical requirements, and submission forms are well-detailed and clear. However, a significant contradiction exists between the stated 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' and the document specifying '100% based on the total cost of the offer,' which creates ambiguity for bidders.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria (basic info states 'relative_weighting' while Document 10 states '100% based on total cost').
Täydellisyys70/100

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, and value, is provided. Requirements and criteria are extensively defined through various documents. However, the explicit contract duration is not stated in the basic information, and one document (.msg) was not processed.

•Missing explicit contract duration in basic information.
•One tender document (.msg format) was not processed for content analysis.
Reiluus85/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, and the crucial 'or equivalent' clause for technical specifications, preventing undue tailoring. E-procurement is enabled, ensuring equal access. The 100% cost-based evaluation (if consistently applied) is objective.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

Electronic submission is supported, which enhances practicality. Financing information (EU Funded) is available. However, the absence of an explicit contract start date and the overall contract duration in the basic information reduces the practicality for bidders in planning and resource allocation.

•Missing explicit contract start date.
•Missing explicit contract duration.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus60/100

While most dates are logical and no disputes are present, a critical inconsistency exists between the 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' in the basic information and the '100% based on the total cost' specified in Document 10. There's also a minor contradiction with 'Value Classified: Yes' vs. the explicitly disclosed value.

•Major contradiction in evaluation criteria (basic info vs. Document 10).
•Minor contradiction: 'Value Classified: Yes' despite the estimated value being explicitly disclosed.
Kestävyys60/100

The project itself, involving a bio-fuel-fired boiler house, is inherently a green initiative, which is a significant positive. However, the tender documents do not appear to include additional explicit green procurement criteria (e.g., specific environmental certifications, waste reduction targets), social aspects, or innovation focus beyond the core project scope.

•Lack of explicit additional green procurement criteria beyond the project's inherent nature.
•No explicit social criteria included.

Vahvuudet

Clear and detailed technical requirements and submission forms.
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' clause for technical specifications, promoting fair competition.
Project is EU Funded and involves a bio-fuel boiler house, contributing to green initiatives.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Value disclosed and full document access provided.

Huolenaiheet

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% cost).
Missing explicit contract duration and start date in basic information.
Non-standard procedure/type codes and private organization issuing 'government tender' create minor ambiguity.
Lack of explicit additional green, social, or innovation criteria in the tender documents.
One document (.msg) was unprocessable.

Suositukset

1. Clarify and resolve the contradiction in evaluation criteria immediately to ensure transparency and avoid bidder confusion.
2. Provide explicit contract duration and anticipated start date in the basic tender information for better bidder planning.
3. Consider incorporating additional explicit green, social, and innovation criteria, especially for an EU-funded project, to maximize sustainability impact.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa