Sheen Mountin ala-aste ~ Siivouskilpailutus

This tender for school cleaning services is generally well-structured with clear requirements and good data consistency. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed documentation, impacting completeness and sustainability.

The tender follows a competitive flexible procedure and specifies a CPV code, indicating a degree of regulatory adherence. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract duration. No disputes are reported. However, the absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed evaluation criteria slightly reduces its score.

The description of the school's ethos, student/staff numbers, and scope of services is clear. Requirements for initiative, innovation, and alignment with school values are stated. The use of CPV code enhances clarity. The PSQ Document is referenced for further information, though its content is not directly available.

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code is provided. However, essential tender documents are listed as having no available content, and the lack of explicitly detailed evaluation criteria means key information for bidders is missing.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The procedure allows for flexibility, and the mention that the lowest price is not necessarily accepted suggests a focus beyond just cost. The use of an e-sourcing portal promotes accessibility. No apparent tailored requirements favouring specific companies were found.

The tender utilizes an e-sourcing portal for response, which is practical. However, the provision of document URLs is specific to the portal, and the absence of readily accessible document content (beyond the link) can be a barrier. Financing details beyond the estimated value and current contract value are not explicitly provided.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, dates, and values are populated logically. The contract start date and duration align. No suspension or disputes are reported, contributing to high consistency.

The tender mentions 'initiative and innovation' as desired qualities, which could touch upon innovation. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement or social aspects, and it is not indicated as EU funded, limiting its sustainability score.