Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Karkotteen toimitus nuorten metsiköiden suojaamiseksi vahingoilta

Avoin
Määräaika
12 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 28, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Tarvikkeet
Viite
169466
Arvo
Ei ilmoitettu
Sijainti
Latvia
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 29, 2026
Organisaatio
CPV-koodi
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 29, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 21, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 28, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 28, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
Ei ilmoitettu
Kesto
1 kuukautta
Sijainti
Latvia
Tyyppi
Tarvikkeet
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€31,188
Keskim. tarjoukset
2.0
Kilpailu
Matala
PK-yritys voittajat
100%
1,119 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Karkotteen toimitus nuorten metsiköiden suojaamiseksi vahingoilta.

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

65%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for repellent supply to protect young forests presents a straightforward procurement opportunity. Success hinges on meticulous adherence to all mandatory requirements, demonstrating robust technical and financial capability, and potentially differentiating through a highly competitive price or superior product quality, given the absence of explicit evaluation criteria beyond compliance.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Reliable and Compliant Supply of Effective Forest Protection Repellents

Cost-Effective Solution for Young Forest Protection

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Potential for price leadership due to lack of explicit price evaluation weighting.
Opportunity to establish a strong relationship with SIA 'Rīgas meži' for future contracts.
Focus on product quality and efficacy as a differentiator.
Keskeiset haasteet
Absence of specified evaluation criteria.

Focus on exceeding minimum requirements in all areas, particularly technical specifications and pricing. Assume a 'pass/fail' approach for mandatory requirements and a strong emphasis on price if other criteria are equal.

Potential for high competition from established suppliers.

Thoroughly research potential competitors and their offerings. Highlight unique selling propositions related to product performance, delivery reliability, or cost-effectiveness.

Strict adherence to all documentation and submission requirements.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all submitted documents. Assign dedicated personnel to ensure all forms are completed accurately and all required attachments are included.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A supplier with a proven track record in providing chemical or biological repellents, capable of meeting stringent quality and delivery standards. The ideal bidder will possess a strong understanding of forestry protection needs, efficient supply chain management, and the financial stability to fulfill the contract. Experience with SIA 'Rīgas meži' or similar public sector entities in Latvia would be advantageous.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Compliance with Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Detailed information on subcontractors, persons whose capabilities are relied upon, supplier associations, individuals with decisive influence, and officials/beneficial owners
Submission of a compliant Technical Proposal
Submission of a compliant Financial Proposal
Adherence to Submission Deadline (2026-04-28 09:00)
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrably superior repellent efficacy and longevity.
Highly competitive pricing without compromising quality.
Exceptional supply chain reliability and delivery punctuality.
Proactive customer service and technical support.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, consider subtly highlighting any existing company practices that align with broader social responsibility, such as local employment or ethical sourcing, if they can be integrated without adding significant cost or complexity.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds

Ensure 100% compliance. Conduct thorough due diligence on all entities and individuals involved in the bid to identify and mitigate any potential exclusion grounds. This is a non-negotiable 'pass/fail'.

Eligibility Requirements (Subcontractors, etc.)

Provide complete and accurate information as requested in 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem'. Transparency and completeness here are crucial for demonstrating legitimacy and capability.

Technical Capability

Align the technical proposal precisely with the requirements outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija'. If specific performance metrics are mentioned, aim to exceed them. If not, focus on proven efficacy and safety.

Financial Requirements

Submit a financially sound proposal that is competitive. Given the lack of explicit price weighting, a highly attractive price point could be a de facto differentiator.

Suositukset6
Thoroughly Review All Tender Documents
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Scrutinize 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija', 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija', and 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem' for all mandatory requirements, exclusion grounds, and submission details. Do not rely solely on AI summaries.

Ensures full compliance and avoids disqualification.
Assume Price is a Key Differentiator
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume that price will be a significant factor, especially if all mandatory requirements are met. Develop a pricing strategy that is competitive while ensuring profitability.

Increases chances of winning if price is a primary consideration.
Highlight Product Efficacy and Reliability
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Even without explicit evaluation, emphasize the proven effectiveness and reliability of the proposed repellent in protecting young forests. Provide data or case studies if possible, demonstrating its performance against common pests.

Builds confidence in the product's ability to meet the core need.
Rigorous Internal Bid Review
KorkeaKorkea vaiva

Implement a multi-stage internal review process involving legal, technical, and commercial teams to ensure all aspects of the bid are compliant, accurate, and compelling before submission.

Minimizes errors and omissions, increasing bid quality.
Proactive Due Diligence on Exclusion Grounds
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Conduct thorough background checks on all involved parties (including subcontractors) to proactively identify and address any potential mandatory exclusion grounds. Consult legal counsel if necessary.

Prevents automatic disqualification.
Subtly Integrate CSR Messaging (If Applicable)
MatalaMatala vaiva

If your company has demonstrable local employment, sustainable sourcing, or other relevant CSR initiatives, briefly and subtly mention them in the bid narrative if it doesn't detract from the core offering and is not explicitly forbidden.

May offer a slight advantage if the authority has unstated preferences.
Kilpailuasema
Position your bid as the most reliable and cost-effective solution for SIA 'Rīgas meži's' immediate need for young forest protection. Emphasize your ability to deliver a high-quality product on time and within budget, ensuring minimal risk for the contracting authority.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

7 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (2)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (2)
Tekninen (1)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--The submission deadline is April 28, 2026, 09:00.
--Submission requirements are outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija'.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion conditions are outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija'.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must provide information about subcontractors, persons whose capabilities they rely on, supplier associations, individuals with decisive influence, and officials/beneficial owners as per 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem'.
--Eligibility requirements are outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija'.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Technical proposal requirements are outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija'.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Financial proposal requirements are outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija'.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

3 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169466_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260329153711.pdf -- 96.4 KB

This document outlines the requirements for the first part of a tender concerning the supply of repellent for young forest protection, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, and technical and financial proposal requirements.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169466_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260329153712.pdf -- 96.4 KB

This document outlines the requirements for the second part of a tender concerning the supply of repellent for young forest protection, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, and technical and financial proposal requirements.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
1_Pieteikums_2026_30_1.docx -- 49.7 KB

This document contains an application form for participation in a procurement, requiring bidders to provide information about subcontractors, persons whose capabilities they rely on, supplier associations, individuals with decisive influence, and officials/beneficial owners.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for repellent supply is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks transparency in financial value and specific evaluation criteria. Document access appears restricted, impacting fairness.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable given the active status and submission date. Regulatory compliance is assumed unless otherwise indicated.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the tender is clear, and requirements are documented within the provided form templates. However, specific evaluation criteria are not explicitly stated, which could lead to ambiguity.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, contract duration, and tender validity. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Reiluus85/100

The tender is open, and documents are available, suggesting a degree of fairness. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag indicates potential limitations on full document access for all potential bidders, which negatively impacts fairness.

Restricted document access
Käytännöllisyys65/100

The tender is designated as E-Procurement, which is positive. However, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests a potential issue with the submission process, and the contract start date is not explicitly mentioned.

No e-submission
Contract start date not specified
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical and consistent.

Kestävyys50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is also not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Vahvuudet

Clear description and objective
Proper CPV code provided
Multiple required documents available
E-Procurement designation

Huolenaiheet

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access

Suositukset

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin