Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

RMH - BEMS-konsultointi

Avoin
Määräaika
74 päivää jäljellä
Kesäkuu 28, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Restricted Procedure
Viite
001736-2026
Arvo
£252,000
Sijainti
Inner London - West, Iso-Britannia
Julkaistu
Huhtikuu 08, 2026
CPV-koodi
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Tammikuu 09, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Kesäkuu 21, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Kesäkuu 28, 2026

Sopimuksen alkamispäivä

Kesäkuu 28, 2026

Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
£252,000
Kesto
36 kuukautta
Sijainti
Inner London - West
Tyyppi
Restricted Procedure
68
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Rakennusten energianhallintajärjestelmän (BEMS) konsultointipalvelujen tarjoaminen, mukaan lukien strategian kehittäminen, tekninen tarkastus, standardien kehittäminen, tarjoustuki ja projektien valvonta koko Trustin kiinteistökannassa.

Riskianalyysi

Riskianalyysi ei ole vielä saatavilla tämän maan tarjouskilpailuille. Tällä hetkellä tuettu: Viro, Latvia, Liettua, Puola, Ranska, Iso-Britannia, Tanska, Alankomaat, Norja ja Suomi.

Voittostrategia

Hanki tekoälyllä luotu voittostrategia, joka on räätälöity tähän tarjouskilpailuun. Sisältää voiton todennäköisyyspisteet, keskeiset mahdollisuudet ja haasteet, suositellut tarjouksen painopistealueet, kilpailuasemanäkemykset ja toimintasuositukset mahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

Kirjaudu sisään

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

15 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (5)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (2)
Tekninen (6)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-06-28 23:00:00.
--Bids must include a comprehensive quality proposal addressing the scope of services, which will be evaluated for 60% of the total score.
--Bids must include a detailed price proposal, which will be evaluated for 40% of the total score.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by relevant public procurement regulations (e.g., serious criminal offences, corruption, fraud, tax evasion, breach of environmental, social, or labour law).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally constituted and registered to operate in the relevant jurisdiction.
--Bidders must possess the necessary professional and commercial registrations to provide BEMS consultancy services.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must demonstrate the capability to provide BEMS consultancy services, including strategy development.
--Bidders must demonstrate the capability to provide technical review services for BEMS.
--Bidders must demonstrate the capability to develop BEMS standards.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must demonstrate financial stability and capacity to deliver a 36-month contract with an estimated value of 252,000 EUR.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

3 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

OCDS RecordDOC
001736-2026_ocds_record.json

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
001736-2026_ocds_release.json

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Official PDF VersionPDF
001736-2026_official.pdf

This document is a tender notice from The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust for Building Energy Management System (BEMS) consultancy services, detailing the scope, estimated value, contract dates, and evaluation criteria (60% quality, 40% price).

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

68
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender provides essential basic information and a clear service description but is critically incomplete due to the absence of any tender documents. This fundamental flaw makes it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a compliant and competitive offer, severely compromising the quality and fairness of the procurement process.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen100/100

The tender mentions mandatory exclusion grounds and the use of a Restricted procedure, indicating an intent to comply with public procurement regulations. However, the lack of full tender documents and detailed procedural information for the Restricted procedure makes it impossible to fully verify legal compliance of the process.

Lack of detailed procedural information for the 'Restricted' procurement procedure.
Selkeys40/100

The service description and evaluation weightings (60% quality, 40% price) are clear. However, the technical capability and financial stability requirements are vague, lacking specific metrics or methods for demonstration, which could lead to inconsistent interpretations.

Vague technical capability requirements ('demonstrate the capability') without specific metrics or evidence types.
Vague financial stability requirements ('demonstrate financial stability and capacity') without specific thresholds or required documentation.
Täydellisyys83/100

The tender is critically incomplete. The complete absence of any tender documents (e.g., detailed specifications, terms and conditions, instructions to bidders, forms) means bidders cannot fully understand the scope, requirements, or submission process. This is a fundamental flaw.

No tender documents attached or available, making it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive bid.
Missing detailed evaluation criteria for the 60% quality proposal.
Reiluus60/100

The lack of detailed tender documents and specific evaluation criteria creates an uneven playing field and risks subjective assessment. While no explicit tailoring is evident, the vagueness of requirements could allow for arbitrary interpretation, potentially disadvantaging some bidders.

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria for the 60% quality proposal could lead to subjective assessment.
The absence of tender documents creates an unfair disadvantage for all potential bidders, hindering their ability to compete equally.
Käytännöllisyys40/100

The tender is highly impractical for bidders. Without any tender documents, potential suppliers cannot understand the full scope, terms, conditions, or submission requirements, rendering it impossible to prepare a meaningful and compliant bid.

Bidders cannot practically prepare a comprehensive and compliant bid without access to tender documents.
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus100/100

The provided information is generally consistent within the extract. However, the 'Innovation Focus' characteristic is not supported by any specific requirements or evaluation criteria in the extracted content.

The 'Innovation Focus' characteristic is not reflected in the extracted requirements or evaluation criteria, indicating a potential inconsistency or missed opportunity.
Kestävyys25/100

No specific green procurement or social criteria are mentioned in the extracted requirements. This represents a missed opportunity for the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust to leverage its procurement for broader sustainability goals.

Absence of specific green procurement criteria.
Absence of specific social criteria.

Vahvuudet

Clear service description and scope of work.
Transparent evaluation weighting (60% quality, 40% price).
Mandatory exclusion grounds are specified, promoting ethical bidding.
Estimated contract value and duration are provided, aiding bidder planning.

Huolenaiheet

Critical absence of any tender documents, making bid preparation impossible.
Missing detailed evaluation criteria for the 60% quality proposal, risking subjective assessment.
Vague technical capability and financial stability requirements, lacking specific metrics.
Incomplete procedural information regarding the stages of the 'Restricted' procurement.
Lack of specific green or social sustainability criteria, despite being a public trust.

Suositukset

1. Immediately publish comprehensive tender documents, including detailed specifications, terms and conditions, and all necessary submission forms.
2. Clearly define specific, measurable, and objective evaluation criteria for the 60% quality proposal, potentially incorporating the 'Innovation Focus'.
3. Provide clear guidance on how bidders should demonstrate technical capability and financial stability, including specific thresholds or required evidence.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin