Park View School ~ Siivouskilpailutus

This tender for Park View School cleaning services is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a disclosed estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on the submission process beyond referring to an external document.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and a competitive flexible procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity implied by the PSQ document. No disputes are noted. The procedure is an open tender, which is standard.

The description of services required is detailed, outlining specific expectations for quality, innovation, and environmental considerations. The financial model with monthly reconciliation is clearly explained. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how submissions will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided. However, the lack of accessible content for the 'PSQ Document' and the absence of explicit evaluation criteria mean that crucial details for a complete understanding of the requirements are missing.

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for selection, while not explicitly listed, are implied through the detailed technical requirements. The requirement for London Living Wage and progressive employment terms are positive social aspects. The procedure is competitive.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, it does not explicitly mention e-submission, and the reference to an external 'PSQ Document' without accessible content hinders practical preparation. Financing information is not detailed beyond the estimated value.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The contract duration and start date are logical. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are consistent.

The tender explicitly requests proposals for environmental sensitivity and carbon neutrality, and mentions working towards the school's environmental policies. This indicates a focus on green procurement. However, specific social criteria beyond the London Living Wage are not detailed, and innovation is encouraged but not a primary focus.