Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Valtion merkityksellisen alueellisen tien nro 1504 Išorai–Užusaliai–Būdos 3,802 km pituisen sillan rakentaminen Šešuva-joen yli

Avoin
Määräaika
19 päivää jäljellä
Toukokuu 05, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Open Procedure
Viite
7141322
Arvo
Ei ilmoitettu
Sijainti
Vilnius County, Liettua
Julkaistu
Huhtikuu 08, 2026
Organisaatio
CPV-koodi
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 27, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 28, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Toukokuu 05, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Toukokuu 05, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
Ei ilmoitettu
Kesto
62 kuukautta
Sijainti
Vilnius County
Tyyppi
Open Procedure
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€131,412
Keskim. tarjoukset
3.9
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
98%
2,076 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Valtion merkityksellisen alueellisen tien nro 1504 Išorai–Užusaliai–Būdos 3,802 km pituisen sillan rakentaminen Šešuva-joen yli
Vihreä hankinta

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

60%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for engineering design services for a regional road bridge presents a significant opportunity. The lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements necessitates a proactive approach to defining value and demonstrating capability. A winning strategy will focus on robust technical proposals, strong sustainability integration, and clear communication of project benefits.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Delivering Sustainable and Resilient Bridge Infrastructure

Expert Engineering for Critical Regional Connectivity

Proven Expertise in Lithuanian Infrastructure Projects

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for proactive definition of value proposition.
Green Procurement requirement offers a platform for differentiation through sustainable design solutions.
The 62-month duration allows for a well-paced and thoroughly executed design process.
The CPV code (71320000) clearly defines the scope as engineering design services.
Keskeiset haasteet
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult to tailor the bid to specific scoring mechanisms.

Develop a comprehensive bid that addresses all potential evaluation factors, emphasizing technical excellence, sustainability, and value for money. Proactively suggest potential evaluation weighting based on common procurement practices for similar projects.

Limited information on Mandatory Exclusion Grounds, Eligibility, Technical, Financial, and Submission Requirements.

Thoroughly review all provided documents (SPS_priedas_Nr._4_Technine_specifikacija_TU_ir_kt.zip, Specialiosios_pirkimo_sąlygos_(SPS).pdf, Bendrosios_pirkimo_salygos_(BPS)v1.pdf) for any implicit or explicit requirements. If ambiguity persists, consider submitting a clarification request to the contracting authority.

High competition is likely given the nature of the project and the lack of disclosed estimated value.

Focus on demonstrating unique value, superior technical expertise, and a strong commitment to sustainability. Highlight past successes on similar projects and emphasize cost-effectiveness through efficient design.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A highly experienced engineering consultancy with a proven track record in bridge design, road infrastructure projects, and a strong commitment to sustainable engineering practices. The ideal bidder will possess a deep understanding of Lithuanian construction standards and regulations, and the capacity to deliver complex projects within a 62-month timeframe.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Technical design for a regional road bridge over the Šešuva river.
Adherence to Green Procurement principles.
Delivery within a 62-month duration.
Engineering design services (CPV: 71320000).
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrated innovation in sustainable bridge design and materials.
Proactive identification and mitigation of potential environmental impacts during the design phase.
A highly experienced and dedicated project team with specific expertise in Lithuanian infrastructure.
A clear and compelling approach to integrating Green Procurement principles beyond minimum requirements.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
Commitment to using locally sourced materials where feasible to support the regional economy.
Proposing design elements that enhance local biodiversity around the bridge site.
Developing a training and skills development plan for local workforce involvement during the design oversight phase.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Technical Proposal (Design Excellence)

Provide a detailed and innovative design concept that addresses all technical challenges of the bridge and road connection. Emphasize structural integrity, longevity, and constructability. Include preliminary designs, methodology, and risk assessments.

Sustainability and Green Procurement

Integrate a comprehensive sustainability plan that goes beyond basic compliance. Detail strategies for minimizing environmental impact during design and construction, material selection, energy efficiency, and lifecycle considerations. Quantify environmental benefits where possible.

Project Management and Delivery

Present a robust project management plan outlining clear timelines, resource allocation, quality assurance processes, and communication protocols. Demonstrate the ability to manage a project of this scale within the 62-month timeframe.

Value for Money

While price is not explicitly mentioned as an evaluation criterion, demonstrate cost-effectiveness through efficient design, optimized material usage, and consideration of long-term maintenance costs.

Suositukset7
Thoroughly Analyze All Provided Documents
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Despite limited AI extraction, meticulously review 'SPS_priedas_Nr._4_Technine_specifikacija_TU_ir_kt.zip', 'Specialiosios_pirkimo_sąlygos_(SPS).pdf', and 'Bendrosios_pirkimo_salygos_(BPS)v1.pdf' for any implicit or explicit requirements regarding exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission criteria. This is crucial for bid compliance.

Ensures bid compliance and avoids disqualification.
Proactively Define Evaluation Criteria
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, develop a bid that anticipates likely evaluation factors (e.g., technical merit, sustainability, price, experience). Structure the proposal to clearly address these anticipated criteria, demonstrating superior performance in each. Consider proposing a weighting system that reflects the importance of each element.

Maximizes scoring potential and demonstrates a strategic understanding of the procurement.
Emphasize Sustainable Design Innovation
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Leverage the 'Green Procurement' requirement by going beyond minimum standards. Propose innovative sustainable design solutions, material choices, and construction methodologies that offer long-term environmental and economic benefits. Quantify these benefits where possible.

Sets the bid apart from competitors and aligns with public policy objectives.
Conduct Clarification Request (If Necessary)
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

If, after thorough document review, significant ambiguities remain regarding mandatory requirements or evaluation, submit a formal clarification request to AB Via Lietuva well in advance of the deadline. This demonstrates diligence and ensures a compliant bid.

Resolves ambiguities and ensures bid accuracy and compliance.
Integrate Local Economic and Environmental Benefits
KeskitasoKeskitason vaiva

Incorporate specific commitments for local economic development (e.g., local material sourcing, local workforce engagement) and environmental enhancement (e.g., biodiversity considerations) into the proposal. This addresses potential unstated social value expectations.

Enhances the bid's appeal and demonstrates corporate social responsibility.
Develop a Robust Risk Management Plan
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Include a comprehensive risk assessment and mitigation plan covering technical, environmental, logistical, and schedule risks associated with the bridge design and construction oversight. This demonstrates foresight and preparedness.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver the project successfully.
Showcase Relevant Project Experience
KeskitasoKeskitason vaiva

Provide detailed case studies and testimonials of previous bridge and road infrastructure projects, particularly those in Lithuania or similar challenging environments. Highlight successful delivery within budget and schedule, and any innovative solutions implemented.

Builds credibility and demonstrates proven capability.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most technically sound and sustainable solution, emphasizing long-term value and resilience. Highlight a proactive approach to risk management and a deep understanding of Lithuanian regulatory frameworks. Focus on demonstrating a commitment to environmental stewardship that exceeds basic requirements.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

Tekoäly poimii ja järjestää kaikki vaatimukset tarjousasiakirjoista – pakolliset pätevyydet, tekniset eritelmät, taloudelliset ehdot ja toimitussäännöt – selkeästi luokiteltuna, jotta tiedät tarkalleen, mitä tarjouksen tekeminen vaatii.

Kirjaudu sisään

Perusvaatimukset

  • Company registration in EU required
  • Proven track record in similar projects
  • Financial stability documentation

Asiakirjat

12 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

SPS_priedas_Nr._10_Tiekeju_kvalifikacijos_reikalavimai.docxDOC
SPS_priedas_Nr._10_Tiekeju_kvalifikacijos_rei... -- 35.7 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

SPS_priedas_Nr._5_Pasiūlymo_forma.docxDOC
SPS_priedas_Nr._5_Pasiūlymo_forma.docx -- 41.5 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

SPS_priedas_Nr._7_Tiekėjo_deklaracija_dėl_atitikimo_nacionalinio_saugumo_reikala...DOC
SPS_priedas_Nr._7_Tiekėjo_deklaracija_dėl_ati... -- 50.7 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

SPS_priedas_Nr._9_Deklaracijos_dėl_sutikimo_būti_subtiekėju_ūkio_subjektu_pavyzd...DOC
SPS_priedas_Nr._9_Deklaracijos_dėl_sutikimo_b... -- 33.5 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Bendrosios_pirkimo_salygos_(BPS)v1.pdfPDF
Bendrosios_pirkimo_salygos_(BPS)v1.pdf -- 363.3 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

NoticePDF
Notice_7141322.pdf

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Specialiosios_pirkimo_sąlygos_(SPS).pdfPDF
Specialiosios_pirkimo_sąlygos_(SPS).pdf -- 435.2 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

SPS_priedas_Nr._17_Paslaugu_teikimo_(projektavimo)_grafiko_pavyzdys__.xlsxXLS
SPS_priedas_Nr._17_Paslaugu_teikimo_(projekta... -- 27.6 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

SPS_priedai_Nr._11_15.zipZIP
SPS_priedai_Nr._11_15.zip -- 117.0 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

SPS_priedas_Nr._4_Technine_specifikacija_TU_ir_kt.zipZIP
SPS_priedas_Nr._4_Technine_specifikacija_TU_i... -- 3.3 MB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

SPS_priedas_Nr._6_EBVPD.zipZIP
SPS_priedas_Nr._6_EBVPD.zip -- 79.9 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

SPS_priedas_Nr._8_Sutarties_projektas.zipZIP
SPS_priedas_Nr._8_Sutarties_projektas.zip -- 738.4 KB

Tälle asiakirjalle ei ole saatavilla yhteenvetoa.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for engineering design services for a bridge reconstruction is generally well-structured, with most essential information present and a clear CPV code. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria impacts completeness and fairness, while the absence of explicit sustainability considerations limits its score in that category.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (2014/24/ES) and uses a standard open procedure. The CPV code is appropriate for engineering design services. There is no indication of disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period, though the tender validity period is standard.

Selkeys80/100

The title and description clearly identify the subject of the tender. While specific requirements are not detailed in the provided text, the presence of numerous attached documents (13 total) suggests that detailed specifications are available within them. The CPV code is clear.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference, CPV, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While many documents are attached, the AI-extracted requirements sections are largely empty, indicating that detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements might be buried within the documents or not explicitly summarized.

Estimated value not disclosed
Reiluus85/100

The tender is open to all bidders and utilizes e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could be a concern for fairness if not detailed in the attached documents. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Evaluation criteria not specified
Käytännöllisyys65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission is likely. The contract duration is specified. However, information regarding financing and the exact contract start date is not explicitly provided in the basic information. The AI-extracted requirements sections being empty hinders the immediate assessment of practical submission needs.

Financing information not explicitly provided
Contract start date not explicitly provided
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (submission, opening, validity) are logically consistent.

Kestävyys50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

No explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation)

Vahvuudet

Clear title and description
Appropriate CPV code provided
Utilizes e-procurement
Numerous supporting documents available
Standard EU procurement procedure

Huolenaiheet

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
AI-extracted requirements sections are empty

Suositukset

1. Disclose the estimated contract value for better transparency.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria within the tender documents or summary.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into future tenders.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin