Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Alueiden ja kohteiden suojelupalvelut

Avoin
Määräaika
12 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 28, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Restricted Procedure
Viite
7059477
Arvo
Ei ilmoitettu
Sijainti
Kaunas County, Liettua
Julkaistu
Huhtikuu 08, 2026
CPV-koodi
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 23, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 21, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 28, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 28, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
Ei ilmoitettu
Kesto
36 kuukautta
Sijainti
Kaunas County
Tyyppi
Restricted Procedure
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€694,267
Keskim. tarjoukset
2.6
Kilpailu
Matala
PK-yritys voittajat
89%
942 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Tämä hankinta koskee alueiden ja kohteiden suojelupalveluiden hankintaa, joka kuuluu hankintalain artiklojen 2:38 ja 2:39 kevennettyyn sääntelyyn.

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

65%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This restricted tender for territory and object security services by the Lithuanian Army's Dr. Jonas Basanavičius Military Medical Service is primarily evaluated on the lowest price. A winning strategy will focus on delivering a highly competitive price while demonstrating robust reliability and security clearances, leveraging the limited information available to identify and exploit potential gaps in competitor offerings.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Uncompromising Security and Reliability at the Most Competitive Price.

Proven Expertise in Securing Sensitive Military Assets.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
The tender explicitly states evaluation is based on the lowest price, creating a direct opportunity for cost-leadership.
The emphasis on employee reliability and classified information handling suggests a need for bidders with established, rigorous vetting processes.
The restricted nature of the tender may limit the number of direct competitors, potentially increasing the impact of a well-priced and compliant bid.
Keskeiset haasteet
Lack of specified evaluation criteria beyond 'lowest price' makes it difficult to optimize for non-price factors, if any are implicitly considered.

Focus intensely on meeting all explicit requirements and ensuring the lowest possible price. Prepare a strong narrative around reliability and security to address potential implicit concerns.

Absence of information on mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements means potential bidders must assume standard stringent requirements and proactively demonstrate compliance.

Conduct thorough due diligence on typical government/military security contract requirements. Prepare comprehensive documentation covering all potential areas of scrutiny, even if not explicitly requested, to demonstrate preparedness and robustness.

The tender is for 36 months, requiring a sustainable and cost-effective pricing model that doesn't compromise quality or profitability over the long term.

Develop a detailed cost model that accounts for all operational expenses, potential escalations, and a reasonable profit margin over the 36-month period. Explore efficiencies in staffing, technology, and logistics to maintain competitiveness.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A well-established security services provider with a proven track record in government or military contracts, possessing strong security clearance capabilities for personnel and operations, and a highly efficient operational model enabling aggressive pricing. Experience with sensitive locations and classified information handling is a significant advantage.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Confirmation of compliance with qualification requirements (including subcontractors)
Disclosure of information about subcontractors and entities relied upon
Information on the reliability of the supplier (and sub-suppliers), including lists of employees involved with classified information
Pricing information
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrable experience and existing security clearances for personnel handling classified information within a military context.
A highly streamlined operational model that allows for a significantly lower cost base compared to competitors.
Proactive identification and mitigation of potential security risks specific to military medical facilities.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly requested, consider a commitment to employing local personnel, particularly veterans or individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds, to enhance community impact and potentially align with broader government social objectives.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Price100% (implied)

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price while ensuring all mandatory requirements are met and profitability is maintained. Conduct thorough cost analysis and explore all avenues for operational efficiency.

Suositukset6
Aggressively Price for Lowest Cost
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the evaluation is based on the lowest price, dedicate significant resources to cost modeling and optimization. Explore all possible efficiencies in staffing, equipment, and operational processes to submit the most competitive price.

Directly impacts the primary evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Thoroughly Document Reliability and Security Clearances
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Prepare comprehensive documentation detailing the reliability of the company and any sub-suppliers. Proactively provide lists of employees involved with classified information and demonstrate robust vetting processes, even if not explicitly detailed in the tender.

Addresses a key explicit requirement and builds trust with the contracting authority, mitigating potential implicit concerns.
Proactively Address Unspecified Requirements
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Since eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are not detailed, assume standard stringent government/military contract requirements. Prepare all necessary documentation and evidence to demonstrate compliance in these areas to avoid any last-minute issues.

Prevents disqualification and demonstrates a high level of preparedness and professionalism.
Highlight Military/Government Sector Experience
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

Emphasize any prior experience providing security services to military or government entities, particularly those involving sensitive locations or classified information. This builds confidence in the bidder's understanding of the specific needs of the Lithuanian Army.

Builds credibility and trust, potentially influencing implicit evaluation factors.
Scrutinize Subcontractor Information
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Ensure all subcontractor information is accurate, complete, and demonstrates their reliability and compliance. The tender explicitly requires disclosure, so any weakness here could be detrimental.

Prevents disqualification due to non-compliance with subcontractor disclosure requirements.
Develop a Long-Term Cost Sustainability Plan
KeskitasoKeskitason vaiva

For the 36-month duration, ensure the pricing strategy is sustainable. This involves forecasting potential cost increases (e.g., labor, fuel) and building in appropriate contingencies without making the bid uncompetitive.

Ensures profitability and operational viability throughout the contract term.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the critical security and reliability demanded by a military organization. Emphasize a lean, efficient operational model that translates directly into savings for the client.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

5 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (1)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (1)
Tekninen (1)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

10 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

2 priedasDOC
2 priedas. Paraiškos forma.docx

This document contains an application form for territory and object security services, requiring bidders to confirm compliance with qualification requirements and disclose information about subcontractors and entities they rely on.

3 priedasDOC
3 priedas. Pasiūlymo forma.docx

This document is a bid proposal form for territory and object security services, requiring the bidder to confirm compliance with tender conditions, provide pricing, and disclose information about subcontractors and confidential data.

4 priedasDOC
4 priedas. Sąlygos kuriomis draudžiamas ir ri...

This document outlines conditions prohibiting and restricting bidder participation in the procurement, along with qualification requirements, specifying alternative documentation like sworn declarations when official documents are unavailable.

5 priedasDOC
5 priedas. Darbuotoju tiesiogiai vykdysianciu...

This document is Appendix 5, a form for listing employees directly performing security services, to be filled by the bidder.

6 PriedasDOC
6 priedas. Duomenys apie teikėjo patikimumą.d...

This document is a form for bidders to provide information about the reliability of their organization and subcontractors, including lists of employees involved with classified information.

7 priedasDOC
7 priedas.Tiekėjo deklaracija dėl atitikimo n...

This document is a supplier's declaration confirming compliance with national security requirements, including not being linked to sanctioned entities or territories.

8 priedasDOC
8 priedas. Sutarties sąlygos _Apsaugos paslau...

This document contains the draft public procurement contract for territory and object security services, outlining general terms and conditions.

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
PIRKIMO SĄLYGOS (008).docx

This document contains the terms and conditions for a limited tender for territory and object security services, requiring bidders to submit specific forms and documentation.

1 priedas_TSPDF
1 priedas_TS_2026-01-16.pdf

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7059477.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for security services for territories and objects located in Lithuania, with a submission deadline of April 28, 2026.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for territory and object security services is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting overall completeness and practicality.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to a restricted procedure and includes a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for a restricted process, and the presence of a contract draft suggests regulatory awareness. However, the absence of a specified reveal date for bids is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Selkeys80/100

The tender provides a clear description of the service required and lists numerous required documents, including forms and a contract draft. The evaluation criteria, however, are not explicitly stated, which could lead to ambiguity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, duration, and CPV code. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are missing from the AI-extracted sections, despite the presence of numerous attached documents.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing AI-extracted requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Reiluus85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The restricted procedure itself can limit competition. While the value is not disclosed, the objective criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could be a concern. The presence of a declaration confirming compliance with national security requirements, including restrictions related to Russian and Belarusian entities, is a specific requirement that could be seen as tailored, though potentially justified by national security.

Value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Käytännöllisyys65/100

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. The contract duration is specified. However, the lack of disclosed financing information and the absence of explicit e-submission instructions (beyond the general 'E-Procurement' characteristic) reduce its practicality. The deadline, while specified, might be considered short for a restricted procedure with numerous required documents.

Value not disclosed
No e-submission details
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The contract duration is logical. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are consistent.

Kestävyys50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Vahvuudet

Well-defined restricted procedure
Comprehensive set of required documents provided
Clear CPV code and NUTS code
E-procurement enabled

Huolenaiheet

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed AI-extracted requirements (exclusion, eligibility, etc.)
Potential for a short submission deadline

Suositukset

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency.
3. Provide more detailed information on exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements, potentially within the AI-extracted sections or by referencing specific clauses in the documents.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin