Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

A. Goštauto-kadun osuuden rakentaminen Nerisin vasemmalle rannalle Vihreältä sillalta Valkoiselle sillalle (Avoin kansainvälinen

Avoin
Määräaika
5 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 21, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Open Procedure
Viite
6965578
Arvo
Ei ilmoitettu
Sijainti
Vilnius County, Liettua
Julkaistu
Huhtikuu 08, 2026
CPV-koodi
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 17, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 14, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 21, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 21, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
Ei ilmoitettu
Kesto
39 kuukautta
Sijainti
Vilnius County
Tyyppi
Open Procedure
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€6,132,447
Keskim. tarjoukset
4.1
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
90%
960 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

On tarkoitus rakentaa A. Goštauto-kadun osuus Nerisin vasemmalle rannalle Vihreältä sillalta Valkoiselle sillalle.
Vihreä hankintaEU-rahoitteinen

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

65%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender presents a significant infrastructure project with a long duration. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria and the 'Green Procurement' requirement, a winning strategy will focus on demonstrating robust technical capability, a clear commitment to sustainability, and a highly competitive, value-driven proposal. Proactive engagement and detailed planning will be crucial.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Delivering a sustainable and high-quality urban infrastructure upgrade for Vilnius, enhancing public space and environmental performance.

Leveraging proven expertise and innovative construction methods to ensure timely and cost-effective project delivery.

A committed partner to VILNIAUS MIESTO SAVIVALDYBĖS ADMINISTRACIJA in achieving its urban development and environmental goals.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Lack of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to define value.
Green Procurement requirement allows for differentiation through sustainability initiatives.
Long project duration (39 months) allows for phased delivery and resource planning.
Open international procurement suggests a competitive landscape where strong proposals will stand out.
Keskeiset haasteet
Absence of detailed technical and financial requirements, and unspecified evaluation criteria, creates uncertainty.

Conduct thorough due diligence, analyze similar past tenders from the contracting authority, and make reasonable assumptions based on the project description. Proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority if permitted. Focus on demonstrating best practice in all areas.

Potential for a highly competitive bid due to the nature of the project and open procurement.

Develop a compelling value proposition that goes beyond price, emphasizing quality, sustainability, and risk mitigation. Leverage unique strengths and experience to create a clear differentiator.

Corrupted ESPD request files (README.txt) indicate potential administrative issues or a need for careful document handling.

Ensure meticulous review of all provided tender documents, verify file integrity, and use the most reliable versions. If clarification is needed regarding the ESPD, seek it promptly from the contracting authority.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
An experienced civil engineering and construction firm with a proven track record in large-scale urban infrastructure projects, particularly road construction and waterfront development. The ideal bidder will have demonstrated expertise in sustainable construction practices, a strong financial standing, and the capacity to manage a 39-month project timeline effectively. Experience working with public sector clients in Lithuania or similar EU jurisdictions would be advantageous.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) submission
Compliance with Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Demonstration of Technical Capability
Adherence to Green Procurement principles
Completion within 39 months
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrated commitment to and innovative application of green construction materials and techniques beyond minimum requirements.
A robust project management plan that clearly outlines risk mitigation strategies, quality assurance processes, and stakeholder engagement for a complex urban project.
A highly competitive pricing strategy that balances cost-effectiveness with long-term value and lifecycle considerations.
Evidence of successful delivery of similar large-scale urban infrastructure projects in environmentally sensitive areas.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
Commitment to employing local labor, with a specific target for apprenticeships or training programs for individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds within the Vilnius region.
Prioritization of local sourcing for materials and services where feasible, supporting the local economy and reducing transportation-related emissions.
Implementation of community engagement initiatives during construction to minimize disruption and inform local residents about project progress and benefits.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Technical Capability

Provide detailed evidence of past successful projects of similar scale and complexity, including methodologies, team expertise, and quality control measures. Emphasize experience with waterfront construction and urban regeneration.

Green Procurement

Detail specific sustainable practices, materials, and technologies to be employed. Quantify environmental benefits (e.g., carbon footprint reduction, waste management). Align with EU Green Deal objectives.

Price/Value

Develop a competitive pricing model that reflects efficient resource management and cost control. Highlight the long-term value and lifecycle cost benefits of the proposed solution.

Project Management & Timeline

Present a comprehensive and realistic project execution plan, demonstrating a clear understanding of the 39-month duration and potential challenges. Include detailed scheduling, resource allocation, and risk management.

Suositukset7
Thorough ESPD Completion and Verification
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Given the corrupted ESPD files, meticulously review and complete the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD). Ensure all required information is accurate, consistent, and verifiable. Seek clarification from the contracting authority if any part of the ESPD process is unclear.

Ensures compliance with mandatory submission requirements and avoids immediate disqualification.
Proactive Value Definition and Sustainability Focus
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, proactively define the value proposition. Emphasize the 'Green Procurement' aspect by detailing specific sustainable practices, materials, and environmental benefits. This will likely be a key differentiator for the contracting authority.

Positions the bid as forward-thinking and aligned with public sector sustainability goals, potentially influencing unstated evaluation priorities.
Demonstrate Expertise in Urban Waterfront Construction
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Highlight specific experience and technical expertise in constructing infrastructure along riverbanks or waterfronts, addressing unique challenges such as soil conditions, water management, and environmental protection. Provide case studies.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to handle the specific complexities of the A. Goštauto g. section.
Develop a Detailed Risk Management Plan
KorkeaKorkea vaiva

Given the long duration and urban setting, create a comprehensive risk management plan that identifies potential risks (e.g., environmental, logistical, stakeholder, unforeseen site conditions) and outlines clear mitigation strategies. This demonstrates foresight and robust project planning.

Reduces perceived risk for the contracting authority and showcases professional project management capabilities.
Integrate Local Employment and Sourcing Commitments
KeskitasoKeskitason vaiva

Incorporate specific, measurable commitments for local employment (including potential for apprenticeships) and local sourcing of materials/services into the proposal. This aligns with broader public procurement objectives and enhances social value.

Strengthens the bid's social value proposition and appeals to the contracting authority's potential broader objectives.
Seek Clarification on Unspecified Requirements
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

If permitted by the tender rules, proactively seek clarification from VILNIAUS MIESTO SAVIVALDYBĖS ADMINISTRACIJA regarding the lack of specified technical, financial, and evaluation criteria. This demonstrates engagement and a desire for clarity.

Reduces ambiguity and allows for a more tailored and competitive bid.
Competitive Pricing with Value-Added Justification
KeskitasoKorkea vaiva

While price is often a key factor, ensure it is competitive and supported by a clear justification of value. Highlight cost efficiencies, lifecycle cost considerations, and the long-term benefits of the proposed solution.

Balances cost considerations with overall project value, making the bid more attractive.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most sustainable and environmentally responsible option, leveraging the 'Green Procurement' requirement to its fullest extent.
Emphasize a proactive and transparent approach to project management, highlighting robust risk mitigation and stakeholder engagement strategies.
Differentiate through demonstrated technical excellence in urban waterfront construction and a commitment to high-quality, long-lasting infrastructure.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

Tekoäly poimii ja järjestää kaikki vaatimukset tarjousasiakirjoista – pakolliset pätevyydet, tekniset eritelmät, taloudelliset ehdot ja toimitussäännöt – selkeästi luokiteltuna, jotta tiedät tarkalleen, mitä tarjouksen tekeminen vaatii.

Kirjaudu sisään

Asiakirjat

8 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

Pirkimo bendrosios sąlygosDOC
BS.docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a public procurement process for the construction of a section of A. Goštauto street.

Pasiūlymo formaDOC
Pasiūlymo forma.docx

This document is a tender offer form for the construction of a section of A. Goštauto Street on the left bank of the Neris River, requiring bidders to provide supplier information, offer price, and confirm compliance with tender conditions.

Sutarties bendrosios ir specialiosios sąlygosDOC
SBSS.docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a construction works procurement contract, defining key terms, application of conditions, contract composition, and parties' declarations and warranties.

Pirkimo specialiosios sąlygosDOC
SS.docx

This document outlines the special conditions for a procurement by the Vilnius City Municipality Administration for construction works on a section of A. Goštauto Street, specifying tender object, exclusion grounds, and qualification requirements.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.6 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6965578.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the construction of a section of A. Goštauto street on the left bank of the Neris river in Vilnius, Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a corrupted file, likely an ESPD request in XML or PDF format, related to a construction tender for a section of A. Goštauto street in Vilnius.

Žiniaraščiai 1XLS
Neries_krantines_3_ziniarasciai_SKELBIMUI.xls...

This document contains a bill of quantities for the first stage of construction works, detailing costs for preparing the site, earthworks, and installing pavement structures for pathways and fire access roads.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for construction works on A. Goštauto street is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a standard e-procurement process. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to standard EU procurement procedures (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. The procedure is open and international. There are no immediate red flags regarding regulatory compliance or disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of a 3-month tender validity.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the procurement object is clear. Key documents like special conditions and offer forms are provided. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their offers will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including contract duration and tender validity. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding financing are missing, which affects the completeness of the financial information.

Estimated value not disclosed
Financing information missing
Reiluus85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, ensuring broad access. The use of standard forms and an open procedure promotes fairness. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a high degree of fairness.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the lack of explicit information on e-submission mechanisms and financing details reduces its practicality. The contract start date is also not specified.

No explicit e-submission mechanism detailed
Financing information missing
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically presented within the timeline.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Vahvuudet

Clear description of procurement object
Standard EU procurement procedure (2014/24/ES)
E-procurement utilized
Comprehensive set of required documents provided

Huolenaiheet

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of financing and contract start date details

Suositukset

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Provide details on financing sources and the expected contract start date.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin