Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Lakimiehen, asianajaja Romualdas Dulskisin rakennuskompleksin (rek. nro KVR 48304) rakennus, Kaunasin kaupungin kunta,

Avoin
Määräaika
21 päivää jäljellä
Toukokuu 07, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Open Procedure
Viite
6782107
Arvo
€21,370
Sijainti
Kaunas County, Liettua
Julkaistu
Huhtikuu 08, 2026
CPV-koodi
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 23, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 30, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Toukokuu 07, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Toukokuu 07, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
€21,370
Kesto
10 kuukautta
Sijainti
Kaunas County
Tyyppi
Open Procedure
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€131,412
Keskim. tarjoukset
3.9
Kilpailu
Keskitaso
PK-yritys voittajat
98%
2,076 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Lakimiehen, asianajaja Romualdas Dulskisin rakennuskompleksin (rek. nro KVR 48304) rakennus, Kaunasin kaupungin kunta,

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

65%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender seeks architectural and engineering services for a specific building complex. Given the low estimated value and lack of explicit evaluation criteria, a strategy focused on demonstrating clear technical capability, competitive pricing, and efficient project delivery will be crucial. Proactive engagement and a well-structured, compliant bid are key to success.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Proven expertise in complex building assessments and architectural services for historical or unique structures.

Efficient and cost-effective project delivery within the specified timeframe.

Unwavering commitment to compliance and meticulous bid preparation.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Low estimated value may deter larger competitors, creating a more manageable competitive landscape.
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria suggests that a strong, compliant bid that meets all mandatory requirements will be highly weighted.
The specific nature of the building (lawyer Romualdas Dulskis's complex) may favor bidders with experience in culturally significant or historically relevant properties.
Keskeiset haasteet
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize the bid for scoring.

Focus on exceeding minimum requirements for all stated criteria and present a clear, logical, and comprehensive proposal that demonstrates superior understanding and capability. Assume price and technical capability will be heavily weighted.

Potential for a high number of bids due to the open procurement type, despite the low value.

Ensure absolute bid accuracy and completeness to avoid disqualification. Highlight unique selling points and experience clearly and concisely.

The tender documents are primarily focused on exclusion grounds, implying a strict compliance-driven evaluation.

Meticulously review and address all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements. Ensure all supporting documentation is accurate, up-to-date, and directly addresses the tender's stated needs.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A small to medium-sized architectural or engineering firm with proven experience in heritage building assessments, renovations, or similar complex structures. They should possess a strong understanding of Lithuanian building regulations and a capacity for efficient project management within a defined budget and timeline.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Eligibility Requirements
Technical Capability Requirements
Financial Requirements
Submission Requirements
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrated experience with similar historical or culturally significant building complexes in Lithuania.
A clear and concise project execution plan that highlights efficiency and adherence to the 10-month duration.
Competitive pricing that reflects value for money without compromising quality.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly required, consider a statement on commitment to local employment or sustainable material sourcing if applicable to the project scope, even if it's a minor addition to demonstrate forward-thinking.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Technical Capability

Provide detailed examples of past projects that align with the description of the building complex. Highlight the expertise of the team members who will be assigned to this project, emphasizing relevant qualifications and experience.

Price

Develop a competitive pricing strategy that is realistic for the scope of work but also attractive. Ensure all costs are clearly itemized and justified. Consider offering a slight premium for exceptional quality or a very competitive price if margins allow.

Compliance

Treat all mandatory requirements as critical. Double-check all documentation against the ESPD and any other stated requirements. Ensure the submission is error-free and adheres to all formatting and deadline specifications.

Suositukset6
Thoroughly Address Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Carefully review Document 4 ('Tiekėjų pasalinimo pagrindai') and ensure all conditions for exclusion are understood and demonstrably avoided. Provide all requested supporting documents for eligibility and capability.

Prevents immediate disqualification.
Assume Price and Technical Capability are Key
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, focus on presenting a strong technical proposal that clearly demonstrates capability and a competitive, value-driven price. Structure the bid to highlight these aspects prominently.

Maximizes chances of being selected if these are implicitly weighted heavily.
Highlight Niche Experience
KeskitasoKeskitason vaiva

Emphasize any experience with heritage buildings, legal professional properties, or complex architectural assessments. This specific context can be a strong differentiator.

Sets the bidder apart from general architectural firms.
Meticulous Bid Preparation and Review
KorkeaKorkea vaiva

Given the strictness implied by exclusion grounds, conduct multiple internal reviews of the entire bid package for accuracy, completeness, and compliance before submission. Pay close attention to the ESPD (espd-request.xml and .pdf).

Reduces risk of errors and disqualification.
Clarify Ambiguities
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

If any aspect of the tender requirements is unclear, proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority through the designated channels, well in advance of the submission deadline.

Ensures accurate bid submission and avoids misinterpretations.
Consider Optional Social Value Statement
MatalaMatala vaiva

Although not required, a brief, genuine statement on local engagement or sustainable practices can add a positive touch, especially if it aligns with the bidder's ethos.

Minor positive impression, no significant impact on evaluation.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most compliant and technically sound option, emphasizing a deep understanding of the specific building's context and requirements. Highlight efficiency and cost-effectiveness as key benefits of selecting your firm.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

Tekoäly poimii ja järjestää kaikki vaatimukset tarjousasiakirjoista – pakolliset pätevyydet, tekniset eritelmät, taloudelliset ehdot ja toimitussäännöt – selkeästi luokiteltuna, jotta tiedät tarkalleen, mitä tarjouksen tekeminen vaatii.

Kirjaudu sisään

Asiakirjat

11 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

2 priedas „Pasiūlymo forma“DOC
2 priedas Pasiulymo forma.docx

This document contains the "Offer Form" template, which bidders must fill out and submit as part of their proposal for legal services related to the Romualdas Dulskis building complex.

3.1 priedas sutarties „Bendrosios sąlygos“DOC
3.1. priedas Bendrosios salygos (1).docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a services purchase and sale agreement, outlining definitions, interpretation rules, and document hierarchy.

3.2 priedas sutarties „Specialiosios sąlygos“DOC
3.2. priedas SU Specialiosios salygos (1).doc...

This document contains the special conditions for the service purchase and sale agreement for the legal professional Romualdas Dulskis's building complex.

4 priedas „Tiekėjų pasalinimo pagrindai“DOC
4 priedas Tiekeju pasalinimo pagrindai (1).do...

This document outlines the grounds for excluding bidders from a procurement procedure, specifying that supporting documents are generally requested only from the most economically advantageous bidder.

6 priedas „Tiekėjų kvalifikacijos reikalavimai“DOC
6 priedas Tiekeju kvalifikacijos reikalavimai...

This document outlines the supplier qualification requirements, including technical and professional capacity, documentation, and the use of subcontractors or third parties.

7 priedas „Įvykdytų sutarčių sąrašas“DOC
7 priedas Įvykdytu sutarciu sąrašas.docx

This document is a template for listing completed contracts, required as Annex 7 for the procurement of legal services for the Romualdas Dulskis building complex.

8 priedas „Specialistų sąrašas“DOC
8 priedas Specialistu sąrašas.docx

This document is a mandatory list of specialists responsible for the execution of the procurement contract, as per Appendix 8 of the tender conditions.

Konkurso sąlygos Dulskio namasDOC
Konkurso sąlygos Dulskio namas.docx

This document contains the tender conditions for simplified open procurement of applied research services for the Romualdas Dulskis lawyer's building complex.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.6 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6782107.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for architectural, engineering, and research services for the Romualdas Dulskis lawyer's building complex in Kaunas, Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains an ESPD request in XML and PDF format, likely related to a tender for legal services for the Romualdas Dulskis building complex.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for architectural, engineering, and research services exhibits good overall quality, with strong clarity and fairness. However, it lacks detail on evaluation criteria and has some practical limitations regarding submission.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender follows a standard open procedure (2014/24/ES) and includes required elements like CPV codes. Deadlines appear reasonable for the estimated value, and no disputes are noted. The overall legal framework seems sound.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the service is clear, and various documents outline specific requirements, including qualification, exclusion grounds, and offer forms. The conditions are generally well-documented.

Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. A significant number of documents are attached, covering qualification, contract terms, and offer forms. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a notable omission.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Reiluus85/100

The tender provides full access to documentation and discloses the estimated value. While criteria are not fully detailed (e.g., evaluation), the process aims for objective selection through qualification requirements and exclusion grounds. It utilizes e-procurement.

Käytännöllisyys65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides document URLs indirectly through attachment listings. The contract duration is clear, and financing information is presumed available. However, the specific mechanism for e-submission is not explicitly detailed, and the 'opening date' is close to the submission deadline.

No explicit e-submission mechanism detailed
Opening date is very close to submission deadline
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated correctly. Dates appear logical, and there are no noted suspensions or disputes, indicating good internal consistency.

Kestävyys50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

Lack of explicit green procurement clauses
Absence of social criteria inclusion

Vahvuudet

Clear documentation of requirements and qualification criteria
Good overall clarity and fairness
Use of e-procurement
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration

Huolenaiheet

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of detail on e-submission mechanism
No explicit sustainability considerations

Suositukset

1. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
2. Provide explicit instructions or links for the e-submission process.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability elements into future tenders.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin