Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

KGH – NEC-valvoja Rockingham Wingin laajennusrakennukselle

Avoin
Määräaika
13 päivää jäljellä
Toukokuu 01, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Restricted Procedure
Viite
009302-2026
Arvo
£480,000
Sijainti
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, Iso-Britannia
Julkaistu
Huhtikuu 10, 2026
CPV-koodi
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Helmikuu 03, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 24, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Toukokuu 01, 2026

Sopimuksen alkamispäivä

Toukokuu 31, 2026

Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
£480,000
Kesto
13 kuukautta
Sijainti
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire
Tyyppi
Restricted Procedure
65
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Riippumattomat NEC-valvojan konsultointipalvelut Kettering General Hospitalin Rockingham Wingin laajennusprojektiin, varmistaen vaatimustenmukaisuuden työtietojen, sopimusvaatimusten ja lakisääteisten hyväksyntöjen kanssa.

Riskianalyysi

Riskianalyysi ei ole vielä saatavilla tämän maan tarjouskilpailuille. Tällä hetkellä tuettu: Viro, Latvia, Liettua, Puola, Ranska, Iso-Britannia, Tanska, Alankomaat, Norja ja Suomi.

Voittostrategia

Hanki tekoälyllä luotu voittostrategia, joka on räätälöity tähän tarjouskilpailuun. Sisältää voiton todennäköisyyspisteet, keskeiset mahdollisuudet ja haasteet, suositellut tarjouksen painopistealueet, kilpailuasemanäkemykset ja toimintasuositukset mahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

Kirjaudu sisään

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

60 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (12)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (4)
Tekninen (42)
Taloudellinen (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS12
--A weekly report must be submitted directly to the Client and copied to the Project Manager.
--The weekly report must provide the following information:
--A record of progress on a trade-by-trade basis.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The provided information does not explicitly state any mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bidder must be an independent NEC Supervisor consultant service.
--The bidder must be capable of acting in accordance with NEC4 ECC.
--The bidder must be able to provide MEP (Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing) and Building Structure/Fabric NEC supervisor services.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS42
--Expertise in NEC4 ECC principles and application.
--Capability to provide independent inspection, monitoring, and certification of works.
--Ability to ensure compliance with the Works Information, Contract requirements, Statutory approvals, and Relevant healthcare technical standards (HTMs/HBNs).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No explicit financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, financial guarantees) are stated in the provided information. The estimated contract value is 480,000 EUR, implying the bidder should be capable of undertaking a contract of this value.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

3 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

OCDS RecordDOC
009302-2026_ocds_record.json

Kettering General Hospital seeks an independent NEC Supervisor consultant for the Rockingham Wing Extension, requiring expertise in MEP and building structure/fabric inspection, monitoring, and certification to ensure compliance with NEC4 ECC, healthcare standards, and project specifications throughout all project phases.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
009302-2026_ocds_release.json

Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust is seeking an independent NEC Supervisor consultant to provide inspection, monitoring, and certification services for the Rockingham Wing Extension project, ensuring compliance with NEC4 ECC, works information, and healthcare standards throughout all project phases.

Official PDF VersionPDF
009302-2026_official.pdf

Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust seeks an independent NEC Supervisor consultant to provide inspection, monitoring, and certification services for the Rockingham Wing Extension project, ensuring compliance with NEC4 ECC, works information, and healthcare standards across pre-construction, construction, completion, and defects phases.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

65
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for NEC Supervisor services at Kettering General Hospital provides a highly detailed scope of work and requirements but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and electronic submission, impacting fairness and clarity for potential bidders.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender is in a 'planned' status, which mitigates some immediate concerns. Basic legal elements like CPV code and procedure type are stated, though specific codes are missing. The AI summary notes no explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, which is a compliance concern if not addressed in the full tender documentation. The 'Liable Person' field is empty, and the reveal date is not provided.

Missing procedure codes and 'Type' code
No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds stated (as per AI summary)
Selkeys60/100

The description of the required services, objectives, and scope is exceptionally detailed and unambiguous. The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and clearly articulated. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant flaw, making it unclear how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Täydellisyys65/100

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and location, is present. The requirements are extensively detailed. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria significantly impacts completeness. Additionally, one listed document ('Attachment A-11322') is unavailable ('Page not found'), and all documents are marked as 'Required: No', which is unusual for tender documentation.

No evaluation criteria specified
One tender document is unavailable ('Page not found')
Reiluus50/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements, while specific to the project, do not appear tailored to a single company. However, the lack of evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity in the assessment process. The absence of electronic submission ('No e-submission' flagged) creates potential barriers to equal access, and the broken document link further hinders fair access to information.

No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency and objectivity
No electronic submission supported
Käytännöllisyys60/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. The broken link for one of the tender documents also presents a practical hurdle for interested parties.

No electronic submission supported
Broken link for one tender document
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus85/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, and CPV code are consistently populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and dates are logical. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person', procedure codes, and 'Type' code, as well as the missing reveal date.

Empty 'Liable Person' field
Missing procedure codes and 'Type' code
Kestävyys60/100

The tender explicitly includes 'BREEAM targets' as a compliance requirement, which is a strong positive indicator for environmental sustainability in construction. However, there is no broader focus on other green procurement aspects, social criteria, or innovation.

No explicit social criteria
No explicit innovation focus

Vahvuudet

Highly detailed and clear description of services and scope
Comprehensive AI-extracted requirements
Estimated value, duration, and contract start date clearly specified
Inclusion of BREEAM targets for environmental sustainability
No disputes or suspensions reported

Huolenaiheet

Critical absence of evaluation criteria
Lack of electronic submission support
One tender document is unavailable ('Page not found')
Missing mandatory exclusion grounds (as per AI summary)
Missing key administrative details (e.g., Liable Person, procedure codes)

Suositukset

1. Immediately publish clear and objective evaluation criteria to ensure fairness and transparency.
2. Enable electronic submission to enhance accessibility and streamline the procurement process.
3. Verify and rectify the broken document link and clarify the 'Required: No' status for all documents.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin