Sir Robert Pattinson Academy ~ Ateriapalveluiden kilpailutus

This tender for catering services at Sir Robert Pattinson Academy is generally well-structured, with clear descriptions and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code, organization, and procedure type. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline's proximity to the contract start date could be a minor concern for some. No disputes are reported. The procedure is 'Competitive flexible procedure,' which implies a structured but potentially adaptable process.

The description of the academy and the scope of services is clear and provides good context. Technical requirements related to pupil numbers and seating capacity are well-defined. The reference to a 'PSQ Document' for further information is noted.

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are present. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of specified evaluation criteria represent significant gaps in completeness.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The criteria for selection are not explicitly stated, which could be a concern for bidders. However, there are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair competitive process.

The tender specifies an e-submission requirement, which is positive. However, the lack of accessible document content and the absence of explicit financing information or details on the e-procurement platform reduce its practicality. The submission deadline is also relatively close to the contract start date.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. The contract start date is well in advance of the submission deadline, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding within the provided tender details. This suggests a lack of focus on these important sustainability considerations.