NIPB - 6422931 - Palohälytyspalvelut - PSNI Kiinteistö - C000251BS

This tender for Fire Alarm Services for the PSNI Estate is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear CPV code and a competitive flexible procedure. The mention of the Procurement Act 2023, Schedule 8, indicates awareness of regulatory frameworks for contract modifications. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity implied by 'Tender Stage Documentation'. No disputes are reported.

The description of services, including specific systems (Fire Alarm, Gas Suppression, Sprinkler, Disabled Refuge) and maintenance standards (BS5839-1:2017, BS EN 12845), is detailed and clear. The scope of work, including routine maintenance and occasional supply/installation, is well-defined. The conditions for contract modifications are also outlined.

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and CPV code are present. However, the absence of available document content and specified evaluation criteria means crucial details for bidders are missing, reducing overall completeness.

The tender is a restricted procedure, which inherently limits the number of participants. While the value is disclosed and criteria for modifications are mentioned, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed, potentially impacting fairness. The availability of full documentation is implied but not confirmed by content.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission methods and the absence of document URLs for accessing the 'Tender Stage Documentation' hinder practical application. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (submission deadline and contract start) are identical, which is logically consistent for a tender process. No suspensions or disputes are indicated.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender description. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.