Sähköasennusten korjaus- ja huoltosopimukset (EIRM)

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies due to the apparent absence of core tender documents and evaluation criteria, raising serious concerns about legal compliance and fairness. While the project scope is clear, the procurement process lacks fundamental transparency and accessibility.

Legal compliance is severely hampered by the missing reveal date, which prevents assessment of the minimum bidding period. Furthermore, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and the lack of full tender documents (which would contain detailed legal instructions) represent critical gaps in adherence to procurement regulations.

The description of the scope of work is clear and well-defined. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission instructions significantly reduces overall clarity for potential bidders regarding the assessment process and required submission content.

The tender is fundamentally incomplete. While basic information like title, value, and duration are present, the most crucial elements—the actual tender specifications, instructions to bidders, and evaluation criteria—are missing or not accessible. The 'Liable Person' field is also unpopulated.

Fairness is severely compromised by the lack of full document access, as bidders cannot review the complete tender package. The absence of evaluation criteria creates an opaque assessment process, and the lack of e-submission acts as a barrier to equal access and efficient participation.

Practicality is moderate. While contract duration and start date are clear, the absence of e-submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. The lack of explicit document URLs also suggests potential inefficiencies in accessing necessary information.

Data consistency is generally good, with key dates (submission, contract start, duration) being logical and consistent. However, minor fields such as 'Liable Person', 'Type Code', and 'Procedure Code' are unpopulated, and the 'Missing reveal date' is a notable data gap.

The tender shows a complete absence of sustainability considerations. There are no explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, which is a significant missed opportunity for a contract of this scale and duration.