Betoni-/asfalttipohjien ja niihin liittyvien töiden rakentaminen

This tender for construction works is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific technical and financial requirements, and the evaluation criteria are not disclosed, impacting its completeness and fairness.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles, including a clear procedure (open competition below threshold) and a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some. No disputes are indicated. The absence of explicit regulatory compliance details prevents a higher score.

The description of works is clear and specific, detailing the required ground works, concrete bases, bin housings, kerbs, and bollards. The requirements for contractors are broadly outlined in terms of capability. However, the lack of detailed technical specifications and evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration. The contract start date is specified. However, crucial details such as specific technical requirements, financial requirements, and detailed tender documents are missing, impacting the completeness of the information provided.

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is standard. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical requirements could lead to subjective assessments, potentially impacting fairness. Access to full documents is implied via the e-sourcing portal.

The tender utilizes an e-sourcing portal for access and response, which is a practical approach. The contract start date and duration are clear. However, the absence of explicit financing information and the lack of detailed technical specifications might pose practical challenges for bidders in preparing their submissions.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are consistent and do not present any immediate logical conflicts.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided tender details. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.