Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Rajanylityspaikkojen "Grebņeva", "Terehova", "Pāternieki" modernisointi

Avoin
Määräaika
11 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 27, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Rakentaminen
Viite
167008
Arvo
Ei ilmoitettu
Sijainti
Riga, Latvia
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 01, 2026
CPV-koodi
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 01, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 20, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 27, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 27, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
Ei ilmoitettu
Kesto
24 kuukautta
Sijainti
Riga
Tyyppi
Rakentaminen
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€491,981
Keskim. tarjoukset
3.0
Kilpailu
Matala
PK-yritys voittajat
99%
20,606 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Rajanylityspaikkojen "Grebņeva", "Terehova", "Pāternieki" modernisointi
EU-rahoitteinen

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

65%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender requires significant technical capability in infrastructure modernization, particularly BIM integration. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating superior technical expertise, robust project management, and a clear understanding of FIDIC-based contract execution. While social and green aspects are not explicitly required, proactive inclusion can be a differentiator.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Uncompromising Technical Excellence and BIM Mastery for Seamless Border Infrastructure Modernization.

Proven Project Delivery Excellence Under FIDIC Frameworks for Critical National Infrastructure.

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Demonstrate advanced BIM capabilities beyond minimum requirements.
Leverage FIDIC contract experience to showcase robust project management and risk mitigation.
Proactively address potential ambiguities or complexities in technical specifications.
Keskeiset haasteet
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid scoring.

Focus on exceeding minimum requirements across all critical areas, particularly technical and BIM, and assume a strong emphasis on technical merit and demonstrated capability. Engage with the contracting authority through clarification requests if possible.

High insurance requirements may be a barrier for smaller or less experienced bidders.

Ensure robust financial standing and secure appropriate insurance coverage well in advance. Clearly articulate the bidder's capacity to meet these requirements.

The estimated value is not disclosed, making it harder to gauge the scale and complexity of the competition.

Conduct thorough market research and benchmark against similar public infrastructure projects to estimate likely project costs and competitive pricing strategies.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A construction firm with a proven track record in large-scale public infrastructure projects, specifically border crossing facilities or similar critical infrastructure. The ideal bidder must possess advanced BIM capabilities, a strong understanding of FIDIC contract principles, and robust financial stability to meet insurance and project duration requirements. Experience with Latvian regulations and authorities is a significant advantage.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Technical specifications for design, author supervision, and construction work
Requirements for creating and submitting sample BIM models in original and IFC formats, including specific geometric and data parameters
Insurance requirements (professional civil liability, general civil liability, all-risk construction insurance)
Draft contract based on FIDIC conditions and specific Latvian requirements
Mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Superior BIM model quality and data richness, exceeding specified parameters.
Demonstrated experience in delivering complex infrastructure projects within tight timelines and under FIDIC contracts.
A proactive approach to risk management and quality assurance, clearly articulated in the bid.
Innovative solutions or methodologies proposed for construction or project management that go beyond the basic requirements.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
While not explicitly required, propose a commitment to local employment and skills development during the construction phase, highlighting benefits to the Latvian economy.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Technical Capability (Design, Author Supervision, Construction)

Provide detailed methodologies, CVs of key personnel with relevant experience, and case studies demonstrating successful delivery of similar projects. Highlight expertise in border infrastructure or critical public works.

BIM Model Submission

Develop sample BIM models that not only meet but exceed the specified geometric and data parameters. Showcase advanced use of BIM for clash detection, quantity takeoff, and lifecycle management. Ensure flawless IFC export and data integrity.

FIDIC Contract Compliance and Project Management

Clearly outline the proposed project management structure, risk management plan, and quality assurance procedures, explicitly referencing FIDIC principles and how they will be applied to this project. Demonstrate a deep understanding of the draft contract's clauses.

Financial Stability and Insurance

Present clear evidence of financial capability and secure the required insurance policies with the specified limits and conditions. Provide documentation from reputable insurers.

Suositukset6
Master BIM Requirements
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Develop and submit BIM models that demonstrably exceed the specified geometric and data parameters. Focus on data richness, interoperability, and potential for lifecycle integration. This is a key technical differentiator.

High - Directly addresses a core technical requirement and offers a significant opportunity for differentiation.
Assume High Technical Weighting
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, assume that technical capability, especially BIM, will be heavily weighted. Allocate significant resources to developing a technically superior bid.

High - Maximizes the chances of a favorable evaluation in the absence of explicit weighting.
Showcase FIDIC Expertise
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Thoroughly analyze the draft FIDIC contract and highlight the bidder's extensive experience in managing projects under similar contract conditions. Propose a project management approach that clearly aligns with FIDIC principles.

High - Demonstrates competence in contract management and reduces perceived risk for the contracting authority.
Clarify Technical Specifications
KorkeaMatala vaiva

If permitted, submit clarification requests to the contracting authority regarding any ambiguities in the technical specifications or BIM requirements to ensure a precise and compliant bid.

Medium - Reduces the risk of non-compliance and ensures a more accurate bid.
Secure Insurance Early
KriittinenKeskitason vaiva

Begin the process of securing the required professional civil liability, general civil liability, and all-risk construction insurance well in advance. Obtain quotes and confirm coverage limits and conditions.

Critical - Failure to meet insurance requirements will lead to disqualification.
Propose Local Employment Initiative
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

Include a voluntary commitment to prioritize local labor and training opportunities during the construction phase. This can be framed as a benefit to the Latvian economy and a positive contribution to the project's legacy.

Medium - Can enhance the bid's overall appeal and demonstrate corporate responsibility, even if not explicitly evaluated.
Kilpailuasema
Position the bid as the most technically proficient and risk-averse option, emphasizing advanced BIM capabilities and proven FIDIC contract management. Highlight the ability to deliver high-quality infrastructure on time and within budget, minimizing potential issues for the contracting authority.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

10 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (4)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (1)
Tekninen (2)
Taloudellinen (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--The deadline for submission is April 27, 2026, 10:00.
--The tender procedure regulations are contained in the 'Nolikums' document.
--The draft contract, based on FIDIC conditions and specific Latvian requirements, is provided in the 'Līguma projekts' document.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion conditions are outlined in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Selection criteria are outlined in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Technical specifications for design, author supervision, and construction work are detailed in the 'Tehniskā specifikācija' document.
--Requirements for creating and submitting sample BIM models in original and IFC formats, including specific geometric and data parameters, are detailed in the 'Nolikuma BIM pielikumi' document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--A template for a financial offer is provided in the 'Finanšu piedāvājums (veidne)' document.
--Insurance requirements include professional civil liability, general civil liability, and all-risk construction insurance, with specific coverage limits and conditions, as outlined in the 'Apdrošināšanas prasības' document.

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

7 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167008_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260301163023.pdf -- 112.0 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria for the modernization of infrastructure at border crossing points Grebņeva, Terehova, and Pāternieki.

Apdrošināšanas prasībasDOC
Apdrosinasanas_prasibas AK-24_WEB.docx -- 51.6 KB

This document outlines the insurance requirements for bidders, including professional civil liability, general civil liability, and all-risk construction insurance, with specific coverage limits and conditions.

Nolikuma BIM pielikumiZIP
BIM pielikumi_WEB.zip -- 941.8 KB

This document contains requirements for creating and submitting sample BIM models in original and IFC formats, including specific geometric and data parameters, as well as criteria for evaluating these models.

Finanšu piedāvājums (veidne)DOC
Finanšu piedāvājums_AK-24_WEB.docx -- 47.6 KB

This document is a template for a financial offer detailing the modernization of infrastructure at border crossing points Grebņeva, Terehova, and Pāternieki, including design, supervision, and construction works.

Līguma projektsZIP
Līguma projekts ar pielikumiem_AK-24.zip -- 698.3 KB

This document contains a draft contract for the modernization of border crossing infrastructure, including design, supervision, and construction, based on FIDIC conditions and specific Latvian requirements.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_AK-24_WEB.docx -- 161.3 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure concerning the modernization of infrastructure at border crossing points "Grebņeva", "Terehova", and "Pāternieki".

Tehniskā specifikācijaZIP
Tehniskā specifikācija_AK-24.zip -- 9.5 MB

This document contains the technical specifications for the modernization of infrastructure at the "Grebņeva", "Terehova", and "Pāternieki" border crossing points, including design, author supervision, and construction work.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for border crossing modernization is generally well-structured with comprehensive documentation, though it lacks specific evaluation criteria and clear information on document access. The process leverages e-procurement effectively.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure rules, has a clear CPV code, and no immediate disputes are indicated. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the tender's complexity. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the standard procedure.

Selkeys80/100

Requirements are generally well-documented within provided attachments like technical specifications and contract drafts. The overall description is clear, but specific evaluation criteria are missing, impacting overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including contract duration and a reasonable deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and while documents are listed, explicit information about their accessibility without restriction is lacking.

Estimated value not disclosed
Restricted document access (implied)
Reiluus85/100

The process utilizes e-procurement, and the disclosure of the contract draft promotes transparency. However, the absence of disclosed evaluation criteria raises concerns about objective assessment. The requirements appear standard for this type of works contract and not tailored to specific companies.

Missing evaluation criteria
Käytännöllisyys65/100

E-submission is indicated, and financing information is implied through EU funding. The contract duration is specified. However, details on contract start date and clear URL access for all documents are not explicitly provided, impacting immediate practicality.

No e-submission (explicit mention)
Document URL not specified
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The tender status is active, and no suspension or disputes are reported, indicating good internal consistency.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender is noted as 'EU Funded,' which can imply adherence to certain standards. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation as core requirements, limiting its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Vahvuudet

Comprehensive documentation package
Clear procedure (open tender)
Use of e-procurement
Well-defined technical and contractual frameworks

Huolenaiheet

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Potential restricted document access

Suositukset

1. Clearly define and publish evaluation criteria.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders without undue restrictions.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin