Haluatko tehdä tarjouksia julkisista hankinnoista? Tutustu TaaS-tarjousvalmistelupalveluumme
Tarjouskilpailut

Viiden uuden M3-luokan bussin hankinta Jelgavan kunnan toimintojen turvaamiseksi

Avoin
Määräaika
4 päivää jäljellä
Huhtikuu 20, 2026
Sopimuksen tiedot
Kategoria
Tarvikkeet
Viite
168360
Arvo
Ei ilmoitettu
Sijainti
Zemgale, Latvia
Julkaistu
Maaliskuu 19, 2026
CPV-koodi
Projektin aikataulu

Tarjouskilpailu julkaistu

Maaliskuu 19, 2026

Kysymysten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 13, 2026

Tarjousten jättämisen määräaika

Huhtikuu 20, 2026

Tarjousten avaaminen

Huhtikuu 20, 2026

VoittotodennäköisyysPRO
🔒
Päivitä Professional-tasolle
Näe arvioitu voittotodennäköisyytesi historiallisen datan perusteella.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Ostajan tiedusteluPRO
🔒
Avaa ostajan tiedustelu
Näe kulutusmallit, suositellut menettelyt ja paljon muuta.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Toimialan näkemyksetPRO
🔒
Avaa toimialan näkemykset
Näe keskimääräiset voittajahinnat, kilpailutasot ja markkinatrendit.
Päivitä ammattilaiseksi →
Budjetti
Ei ilmoitettu
Kesto
8 kuukautta
Sijainti
Zemgale
Tyyppi
Tarvikkeet
75
Laatupisteet/100
Hyvä
Markkinoiden vertailu
Keskim. voittajahinta
€168,348
Keskim. tarjoukset
1.9
Kilpailu
Matala
PK-yritys voittajat
99%
4,060 analysoitua tarjouskilpailua

Alkuperäinen tarjouskilpailun kuvaus

Viiden uuden M3-luokan bussin hankinta Jelgavan kunnan toimintojen turvaamiseksi

Suorita riskianalyysi

Tunnista mahdolliset riskit, epäjohdonmukaisuudet ja varoitusmerkit kaikista tarjousasiakirjoista. Saat yksityiskohtaisen riskiraportin, jossa on vakavuustasot ja lievennyssuositukset.

Kirjaudu sisään

Voittostrategia

Tekoälypohjainen analyysi tämän tarjouskilpailun vaatimuksista, mahdollisuuksista ja haasteista. Saat strategisia näkemyksiä voittomahdollisuuksiesi maksimoimiseksi.

70%
Arvioitu voittomahdollisuusKohtalainen sopivuus

This tender for five M3 category buses presents a moderate competition opportunity. Success hinges on a technically superior and cost-effective proposal, with a strong emphasis on demonstrating reliability and long-term value. While green and social aspects are not explicitly required, proactive inclusion can serve as a differentiator.

Keskeiset voittoviestit

Reliable and Durable M3 Buses for Jelgava Municipality's Essential Services

Cost-Effective Solution with Superior Lifecycle Value

Trusted Partner for Municipal Transportation Needs

Keskeiset mahdollisuudet
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for strategic emphasis on key strengths.
Opportunity to differentiate through proactive sustainability and social value commitments, despite not being mandatory.
The relatively short duration of 8 months for the contract suggests a need for efficient delivery and minimal disruption.
Keskeiset haasteet
Unspecified evaluation criteria make it difficult to precisely tailor the bid for maximum scoring.

Thoroughly analyze the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības' document for any implicit weighting or emphasis. Focus on demonstrating excellence across all technical and financial aspects, assuming a balanced evaluation. Engage with the contracting authority during clarification periods if possible to gain insights.

Potential for strong competition from established bus manufacturers with existing relationships or market dominance.

Focus on a highly competitive price, superior technical specifications that exceed minimum requirements, and a compelling value proposition emphasizing long-term operational efficiency and reliability. Highlight any unique selling points of your bus models.

Ihanteellinen tarjoajaprofiili
A reputable bus manufacturer or authorized dealer with a proven track record in supplying M3 category vehicles to public sector entities. The ideal bidder possesses strong technical expertise, robust after-sales support capabilities, and a competitive pricing structure. Experience with similar municipal procurements in Latvia or the Baltic region is a significant advantage.
Keskeiset vaatimukset
Technical requirements for M3 category buses
Financial requirements for the procurement
Submission deadlines
Bidder requirements
Evaluation criteria for technical proposals
Evaluation criteria for financial proposals
Keskeiset erottuvuustekijät
Demonstrable superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions (even if not mandated, it shows foresight and cost savings).
Exceptional warranty and after-sales support package, including rapid response times for maintenance.
Customization options that directly address the specific operational needs of Jelgava Municipality (e.g., accessibility features, seating configurations).
Evidence of successful past performance with similar public sector clients, showcasing reliability and client satisfaction.
Sosiaalisen arvon mahdollisuudet
Commitment to providing local employment opportunities during the delivery and initial support phase of the buses.
Offer a training program for the municipality's drivers and maintenance staff on the new M3 buses, enhancing local capacity.
Tarjouksen painopisteet
Technical Proposal

Exceed minimum technical specifications where feasible. Highlight advanced safety features, durability, and ease of maintenance. Provide detailed technical documentation and certifications. Emphasize the suitability of the M3 category buses for the specific functions of Jelgava Municipality.

Financial Proposal

Offer a highly competitive price. Provide a clear breakdown of costs, including any optional extras or service packages. Demonstrate a strong understanding of lifecycle costs, including projected maintenance and fuel expenses, to highlight overall value for money.

Suositukset6
Thoroughly Analyze Technical Specifications
KriittinenKorkea vaiva

Deeply understand and document how your proposed M3 buses meet and exceed all stated technical requirements. Pay close attention to safety, performance, capacity, and durability aspects relevant to municipal functions.

Ensures compliance and forms the foundation of a strong technical score.
Develop a Value-Based Financial Proposal
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

While price is key, frame your financial proposal to highlight long-term value. Include lifecycle cost analysis, warranty details, and potential savings from fuel efficiency or reduced maintenance. This addresses the implicit need for cost-effectiveness beyond the initial purchase price.

Maximizes perceived value and competitiveness, even if price is a significant factor.
Proactively Address Sustainability (Optional)
KeskitasoMatala vaiva

Even though green procurement is not mandated, consider highlighting any eco-friendly features of your buses (e.g., fuel efficiency, emissions standards). This can position your bid as forward-thinking and responsible.

Creates a positive impression and potential differentiator against less environmentally conscious competitors.
Clarify Evaluation Criteria (If Possible)
KriittinenMatala vaiva

If the tender allows for clarification questions, seek to understand the weighting or specific focus areas for technical and financial evaluations. This will allow for precise tailoring of the bid.

Enables targeted bid optimization for higher scores.
Demonstrate Robust After-Sales Support
KorkeaKeskitason vaiva

Detail your service network, spare parts availability, and response times for maintenance and repairs. For a public authority, operational continuity is paramount, and strong support is a key risk mitigator.

Reduces perceived risk for the contracting authority and enhances long-term value proposition.
Propose Local Training Program
KeskitasoKeskitason vaiva

Offer a comprehensive training program for the municipality's staff on operating and maintaining the new buses. This adds value beyond the physical supply and builds local capacity.

Enhances bidder attractiveness and demonstrates commitment to the client's operational success.
Kilpailuasema
Position your bid as the most reliable and cost-effective long-term solution, emphasizing the durability and low operational costs of your M3 buses. Highlight any unique technological advantages or superior build quality that translate into tangible benefits for the municipality.

Kilpailijat

Päivitä nähdäksesi, mitkä yritykset todennäköisesti tekevät tarjouksen tästä hankinnasta, perustuen historialliseen hankintadataan.

Kirjaudu sisään

Vaatimukset ja pätevyydet

10 vaatimusta 5 kategoriassa

Jättäminen (4)
Pakollinen (1)
Vaatimustenmukaisuus (1)
Tekninen (2)
Taloudellinen (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--[Submission deadlines]
--[Bidder requirements]
--[Open tender regulations]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the document summaries]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--[Technical requirements for M3 category buses]
--[Evaluation criteria for technical proposals]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--[Financial requirements for the procurement]
--[Evaluation criteria for financial proposals]

Vaatimusten esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Asiakirjat

2 asiakirjaa saatavilla AI-yhteenvedoilla

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168360_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260319051208.pdf -- 96.1 KB

This document outlines the technical and financial requirements for the procurement of five M3 category buses for the Jelgava municipality, including evaluation criteria for technical and financial proposals.

NolikumsDOC
NOLIKUMS .doc -- 549.5 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender by the Jelgava Municipality for the purchase of five M3 category buses, including submission deadlines, evaluation criteria, and bidder requirements.

Asiakirjojen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi asiakirjojen yhteenvedot ja analyysin

75
Hyvä

Hankinnan laatupisteet

This tender for M3 category buses is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects. The estimated value is undisclosed, which is a minor concern for fairness.

Pisteiden erittely

Lainsäädännön noudattaminen75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure is open, and no disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the available information.

Selkeys80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, and the attached documents (technical specification, regulations) are expected to detail the requirements. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the summary is a point of concern for clarity.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria in summary
Täydellisyys70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and deadlines. The contract duration and tender validity are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Reiluus85/100

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement characteristics, promoting fairness. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag suggests potential limitations in full document access for all potential bidders, which is a significant concern. The lack of disclosed estimated value also slightly impacts fairness.

Restricted document access
Estimated value not disclosed
Käytännöllisyys65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides document URLs. The contract start date is implied by the opening date and duration. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and while e-submission is implied by e-procurement, it's not explicitly confirmed as the sole method.

Financing information not detailed
E-submission method not explicitly confirmed
Tietojen yhdenmukaisuus90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequenced.

Kestävyys50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Vahvuudet

Clear title and reference number
Open tender procedure with e-procurement
Reasonable submission deadline
CPV code provided
Attached tender documents

Huolenaiheet

Restricted document access
Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria in summary
Lack of sustainability criteria

Suositukset

1. Clarify document access for all potential bidders.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
3. Incorporate and clearly state sustainability and innovation criteria.

Tekoälyn pisteytyksen esikatselu

Rekisteröidy nähdäksesi täydelliset vaatimukset ja analyysin

Täydellinen laatupisteanalyysi
Yksityiskohtainen osapisteiden erittely
Vahvuudet ja huolenaiheet -näkemykset
Strategiset suositukset

Luottokorttia ei vaadita • Asennus 2 minuutissa

Lisää prosessiin