Suicide Prevention Pilot Service

This tender for a Suicide Prevention Pilot Service is generally well-structured, with clear eligibility criteria and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific technical and financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are not detailed, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender follows an open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are specified, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the complexity of the service. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of the pilot service and the target audience is clear and detailed. Eligibility criteria are well-defined. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and estimated value is present. The contract duration is specified. However, the lack of detailed technical and financial requirements, and the absence of content in the tender documents, significantly reduces completeness.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The criteria for eligibility are objective. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria could lead to perceived unfairness. The requirement for bids in multiple languages (English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, Lithuanian) is unusual for a UK-based tender and might indicate a lack of fairness or a misunderstanding of typical procurement practices, potentially favouring bidders with multilingual capabilities without a clear justification.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which is contradictory. The contract start date is not specified. Financing information is absent. The duration is provided.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The status is active, and no disputes are reported. Dates are logically presented, with a submission deadline before the contract duration begins. The 'Issues' section flags 'Missing reveal date', which is not directly present in the provided text but could be an internal system flag.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.