Matkaterveysneuvonta- ja rokotuspalvelu

This tender for Travel Health Advice and Vaccinations Service presents a well-defined scope with clear objectives and estimated value. However, it lacks essential details regarding evaluation criteria and e-submission, impacting its practicality and overall clarity for potential bidders.

The tender is in a planning status, which explains the absence of specific exclusion grounds and detailed procedures. The CPV code is appropriate. The estimated value and contract duration are specified. The submission deadline appears reasonable given the planning stage. No disputes are indicated.

The description of the required services is clear and well-articulated, outlining the scope for travel health advice, vaccinations, and malaria prophylaxis. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical requirements leaves room for ambiguity in how bids will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is present. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided. However, crucial tender documents are not available or detailed, and there's a lack of specific information regarding mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria, which are vital for a complete understanding of the tender requirements.

The tender is an 'Open procedure,' suggesting broad accessibility. The estimated value is disclosed. While there are no overtly tailored requirements to specific companies, the lack of detailed evaluation criteria and accessible tender documents could indirectly favour incumbent or better-informed suppliers. The submission deadline is reasonable for an open procedure.

The absence of explicit mention of e-submission and the unavailability of document content significantly hinder practicality for potential bidders. While a contract start date is indicated, the lack of clear submission guidelines and readily available documentation makes the process less streamlined. The provision for multiple languages in submissions is noted but lacks corresponding tender document availability.

Key fields like title, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and contract start date are populated logically. The dates are consistent with a planning phase. There are no indications of suspension or disputes.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on these important sustainability considerations.