Tapahtumapalveluiden puitesopimus

This tender for Event Services Framework Agreement is generally well-structured with clear lots and a defined duration. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable omissions.

The tender adheres to open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of services and the breakdown into ten distinct lots are clear. The eligibility and technical capability requirements are also well-defined for each lot. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria impacts overall clarity.

Basic information such as title, organization, and duration is present. The CPV code and lot breakdown are provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of the tender documents is not available for review, hindering a full assessment.

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad participation. The division into multiple lots promotes competition among specialists. Requirements are objective and related to service provision. The lack of disclosed value is a minor concern for fairness.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive for accessibility. The contract duration is clearly stated. However, the lack of a document URL for accessing the full tender documents and the absence of financing information reduce practicality.

Key fields like title, organization, reference, and deadlines are populated. The contract duration is logical. No suspension or disputes are reported, indicating good data integrity.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.