CPU 7382 Aitojen ja turvatuotteiden toimitus- ja asennussopimus

This tender establishes a multi-supplier framework for fencing and security products, offering a good level of detail in its scope and technical requirements. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial requirements, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is mentioned as a requirement for works.

The description of the framework's scope, including supply, installation, maintenance, and removal of fencing, is clear. Technical capabilities are well-defined. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria creates ambiguity.

Basic information such as title, organization, estimated value, and duration is present. The scope of work is detailed. However, specific financial requirements and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds are missing, and no document content is available for review.

The open procedure and disclosed estimated value promote fairness. The requirements are generally objective and focused on capability. The lack of detailed evaluation criteria could be a concern, but the absence of company-specific tailoring is positive.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, it lacks information on financing and does not explicitly mention e-submission, which is a common modern procurement practice.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The contract start date is clearly defined.

While environmental compliance is mentioned as a requirement for works, there are no specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria explicitly detailed in the tender's characteristics or description. It is not indicated as EU funded.